B
bhall0689
Guest
Would this be permissible in the Catholic Church?
this is not any area where the Church has any teaching other than the general idea of exercising the virtue of prudence. personally I would not want to marry a man who has to wait for me to propose. However, be honest, in how many couples was the man the first one who had the idea at all?Would this be permissible in the Catholic Church?
Well… one that I know of…this is not any area where the Church has any teaching other than the general idea of exercising the virtue of prudence. personally I would not want to marry a man who has to wait for me to propose. However, be honest, in how many couples was the man the first one who had the idea at all?
Right on! A woman wants a man who is confident and in charge. Just look at the success of the romance book industry. The man always ends up winning the heart of the female who “refused to let a man make decisions for her”. There is a reason these love stories sell. It takes the right man to woo a female heart.As many people that are on these boards and in real life that complain about not being able to find anyone to marry… I would think this would be welcome. However, men should be men… but hey, If my wife had beat me to it I would definately still married her. Though my proposal was way cooler than anything she would have come up with.
Though it is good if a man can establish his leadership abilities and protector role right off the bat.
Don’t do it.Would this be permissible in the Catholic Church?
It’s a woman’s world, entirely. A man hasn’t got a chance.Women get tall the wedding stuff, the dress and everything.
Men only have this one thing.
What I mean is: When women were young they thought about all the aspects of their perfect wedding but men think how they will propose.
Don’t take that away from him.
I love my wife but if she had of proposed to me, well, I only have one go and that would be it. I wouldn’t love her any less and our marriage would be the same but it would be like a bride standing at the altar while the groom walks down the aisle.
He has the bride. If that isn’t enough, he should probably say no. Just sayin…Don’t do it.
Women get tall the wedding stuff, the dress and everything.
Men only have this one thing.
What I mean is: When women were young they thought about all the aspects of their perfect wedding but men think how they will propose.
Don’t take that away from him.
I love my wife but if she had of proposed to me, well, I only have one go and that would be it. I wouldn’t love her any less and our marriage would be the same but it would be like a bride standing at the altar while the groom walks down the aisle.
Never in my life have I seen a “say yes to the woman in the dress” show on TLC. Nor Have I ever seen a guy blow 100 dollars in bride dress magazines, nor have I ever seen a guy hang out with 6 of his best freinds trying to decide what dress a bride should have… Just sayin. Any good red blooded american male is NOT thinking “nice dress, if only I could see her in that for the whole honeymoon.” Just sayin.He has the bride. If that isn’t enough, he should probably say no. Just sayin…
Slightly more seriously, I have no idea what you are talking about. The wedding is not “for the bride.” We get a dress, but that is really for both of us. It is nice to look pretty, but it is even nicer to see the face of my love when I dress up. Men and women are different, but couples are different too. It seems clear to me- whether a man or woman, you should know your significant other well enough to have reason to believe that your proposal will be well received.
Romance is great, but it is not everything. When I got engaged, the truth is that there never was a proposal. We discussed getting married and decided we wanted should. That was it. He got his mother’s ring for me a week later. I am not saying that people should not propose in grand ways- some people really want that. I am just saying people are different and what is more important than how you get engaged is knowing your beloved well enough to know what they want, and to love them enough that you want what they want more than what you want.
Weddings are not for women- unless of course you are talking about gay marriage between two women, in which case we ought to be having a different discussion entirely. This modern obsession with the “perfect wedding” or the “bride’s day” is ugly and damaging. Weddings are for the couple, primarily, and the community as well.Never in my life have I seen a “say yes to the woman in the dress” show on TLC. Nor Have I ever seen a guy blow 100 dollars in bride dress magazines, nor have I ever seen a guy hang out with 6 of his best freinds trying to decide what dress a bride should have… Just sayin. Any good red blooded american male is NOT thinking “nice dress, if only I could see her in that for the whole honeymoon.” Just sayin.
Guys do not spend their childhood playing wedding, guys dont plan it out, guys just are praying she shows up.
Weddings are for women, marriage is for both. Never heard of a groomzilla.
Weddings are not for women- unless of course you are talking about gay marriage between two women, in which case we ought to be having a different discussion entirely. This modern obsession with the “perfect wedding” or the “bride’s day” is ugly and damaging. Weddings are for the couple, primarily, and the community as well.
As to the dress, I don’t know any married men who do not get emotional when they discuss the first moment they saw ‘her’ in ‘that dress.’ It is a detail. A small detail that does not matter at all, but both the bride and groom are likely to remember it well.
I have never seen any of the TV shows, so I won’t address that. I will only say that if a bride thinks the wedding is “her day” she misses the point of a wedding. If a groom encourages that perspective, he does himself and his bride a disservice.
There are a lot of details that go into planning a wedding. (Any formal party, really.) In general, those are the details that the bride cares about and the groom does not. Not always. (My future sister-in-law hopes that I will plan her wedding, since neither she nor my brother care much about the details. They just want to be married.) As with anything, if one cares and the other does not, than it is easy to see who will make decisions. At whatever point the wedding becomes those details- whether in the eyes of the bride or the groom- the meaning is lost entirely.
A man who is not interested in the details is understandable. A man who is not interested in the wedding should not be getting married. The wedding is when the sacrament is conferred. To talk about the marriage without talking about the wedding is false. If his thoughts on the subject do not include opinions about colors, styles, dishes, flowers etc., that is fine. If he has no opinions at all about the reception, that is fine. If his thoughts are that this is just something he is doing for her, he is not ready to be married. He does not understand the sacrament.
I am sorry for the detour, but it is a pet peeve of mine. I believe that this selfish attitude about weddings damages marriages in the same way that a fairy tale happily-ever-after notion of love does.
My post initially was just meant to respond to the man who did not want the proposal “taken away.” I think that the idea of divvying up what belongs to who in a wedding is devastating. Some men dream about proposing, some do not. Some women have been planing their weddings all their lives, some have not. The wedding should be a coming together. An offering, not a taking. Staking out what is mine and what is his is silly, but also sad.
What is essential about the wedding is necessarily shared. Everything else, the flowers, the reception, the candles, the proposal- they are all just details, to be shared as delights the couple.
I agree, good post.Weddings are not for women- unless of course you are talking about gay marriage between two women, in which case we ought to be having a different discussion entirely. This modern obsession with the “perfect wedding” or the “bride’s day” is ugly and damaging. Weddings are for the couple, primarily, and the community as well.
As to the dress, I don’t know any married men who do not get emotional when they discuss the first moment they saw ‘her’ in ‘that dress.’ It is a detail. A small detail that does not matter at all, but both the bride and groom are likely to remember it well.
I have never seen any of the TV shows, so I won’t address that. I will only say that if a bride thinks the wedding is “her day” she misses the point of a wedding. If a groom encourages that perspective, he does himself and his bride a disservice.
There are a lot of details that go into planning a wedding. (Any formal party, really.) In general, those are the details that the bride cares about and the groom does not. Not always. (My future sister-in-law hopes that I will plan her wedding, since neither she nor my brother care much about the details. They just want to be married.) As with anything, if one cares and the other does not, than it is easy to see who will make decisions. At whatever point the wedding becomes those details- whether in the eyes of the bride or the groom- the meaning is lost entirely.
A man who is not interested in the details is understandable. A man who is not interested in the wedding should not be getting married. The wedding is when the sacrament is conferred. To talk about the marriage without talking about the wedding is false. If his thoughts on the subject do not include opinions about colors, styles, dishes, flowers etc., that is fine. If he has no opinions at all about the reception, that is fine. If his thoughts are that this is just something he is doing for her, he is not ready to be married. He does not understand the sacrament.
I am sorry for the detour, but it is a pet peeve of mine. I believe that this selfish attitude about weddings damages marriages in the same way that a fairy tale happily-ever-after notion of love does.
My post initially was just meant to respond to the man who did not want the proposal “taken away.” I think that the idea of divvying up what belongs to who in a wedding is devastating. Some men dream about proposing, some do not. Some women have been planing their weddings all their lives, some have not. The wedding should be a coming together. An offering, not a taking. Staking out what is mine and what is his is silly, but also sad.
What is essential about the wedding is necessarily shared. Everything else, the flowers, the reception, the candles, the proposal- they are all just details, to be shared as delights the couple.
Lol! IMO, it depends on the man. Some here have expressed that they would have been disappointed. I know men who say they’d have been relieved. I doubt my own husband would have cared. It depends. You should know him well enough to have some sense of whether it would be welcome or not.
I m wondering, since I never dreamed of weddings as a little girl, does that mean its ok for me to propose to a guy?
Proposals which are a complete surprise are downright idiocy.
Or unmarried? I know some men who got up, against their will, with their brides.I agree, good post.
The modern idea of a wedding is silly. That is sad. That being said… What do you think the ratio of women to men who watched the royal wedding? I’m betting not one strait guy in the US got up that early.![]()
I was watching… (the insides of my eyelids…) http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/ponyguy/sleeping.gifThat being said… What do you think the ratio of women to men who watched the royal wedding? I’m betting not one strait guy in the US got up that early.![]()