Women Scorn Veiled Women. Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cargopilot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
paramedicgirl:
But wearing a veil is not a fashion statement. And I do believe the desire for humility comes from the soul. The veil is an outward sign of that interior humility.
Do you wear your scapular on the outside of your clothing?
If you are covering your head to show the world an outward sign of interior humility, why would a chapel cap not be enough?
 
40.png
YinYangMom:
Quite interesting.
So what is the deal with wanting to cover your head though? I still don’t get it. God gave you the head you have, why cover it at all?
I can think of several other parts of my body that God gave me that I prefer to keep covered.
 
Not being female I can’t say with any certainty, but I would imagine many women would see the wearing of a mantilla or a veil as indicating submissiveness of some sort and thus not in line with current feminist thinking.
 
40.png
Forest-Pine:
I can think of several other parts of my body that God gave me that I prefer to keep covered.
Well heck, that’s just out of plain modesty…we cover those everywhere we go…but our heads? Why in church but not anywhere else then…what is on your head that requires covering for what reason…I just don’t get it.
 
40.png
YinYangMom:
Well heck, that’s just out of plain modesty…we cover those everywhere we go…but our heads? Why in church but not anywhere else then…what is on your head that requires covering for what reason…I just don’t get it.
Did you read post 64?
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Did you read post 64?
Yes. It’s a quote from 1 Corinthians pertaining to a practice which has evolved since then.

The Catholic church continues to teach on the revelations of God’s Word and we trust them in that. Over time, they gain a deeper understanding of the meaning of certain letters, stories and they reflect the deeper understanding by changing the norms by which we worship.

When they removed the requirement to cover our heads it was because they came to a new understanding of a past practice. To continue the practice, for me, would be to reject the Church’s teaching and deeper understanding of the faith.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Why yes, I do.
My chapel cap is next to my Rosary and Bible.
And you carry these both with you 24/7? You see where I’m going with this? I’m pretty sure there many occasions where people spontaneously pray without there chapel caps on. How about Grace? Even the SSPXers I know don’t throw it on when they say Grace or ask God to grant them more patience. If we actually had to where a head covering everytime we prayed, a whole lot less praying would be done. I can think of a few times this week where I wouldn’t have been able to throw on a chapel cap to pray. Do you suggest that we just forget it in these circumstances.

BTW, did the Church used to quote Corinthians when the head covering rule was in effect? I’m still curious to know about why Corinthians goes on to say:
11:15. But if a woman nourish her hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her for a covering.
Anyways, it would seem that those who think that we MUST wear head coverings because of the Corinthians verse should think that we should be wearing them 24/7 in case the need to pray arose unexpectedly. Our Church definitely doesn’t bind us to do this.
 
40.png
palmas85:
Not being female I can’t say with any certainty, but I would imagine many women would see the wearing of a mantilla or a veil as indicating submissiveness of some sort and thus not in line with current feminist thinking.
I’m sure that there are some women who would but that’s certainly not the reason I don’t wear one. My explanation is way to long waaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy to long to give again but the short version is that it would be a distraction for me. I am submissive and definitely not a feminist.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Do you wear your scapular on the outside of your clothing?
No, I wear my scapular under my shirt. But it shows through my white uniform issued shirt. I wear it anyway, and if anyone were to ask me what it is, I would tell them it is a sacramental of the Catholic Church, and a sign of devotion to the Holy Mother of God.
netmil(name removed by moderator):
If you are covering your head to show the world an outward sign of interior humility, why would a chapel cap not be enough?
Of course it would be enough, and I commend you for wearing one. I simply meant that it is not neccessary to coordinate the chapel cap to match one’s dress. And the outward sign of interior humility I mentioned is to show it to God, not to the the world
 
40.png
YinYangMom:
Yes. It’s a quote from 1 Corinthians pertaining to a practice which has evolved since then.

The Catholic church continues to teach on the revelations of God’s Word and we trust them in that. Over time, they gain a deeper understanding of the meaning of certain letters, stories and they reflect the deeper understanding by changing the norms by which we worship.

When they removed the requirement to cover our heads it was because they came to a new understanding of a past practice. To continue the practice, for me, would be to reject the Church’s teaching and deeper understanding of the faith.
Where exactly is the Cannon Law that removed the requirement to cover our head? You’ve got me curious on this.
 
40.png
bear06:
And you carry these both with you 24/7? You see where I’m going with this? I’m pretty sure there many occasions where people spontaneously pray without there chapel caps on. How about Grace? Even the SSPXers I know don’t throw it on when they say Grace or ask God to grant them more patience. If we actually had to where a head covering everytime we prayed, a whole lot less praying would be done. I can think of a few times this week where I wouldn’t have been able to throw on a chapel cap to pray. Do you suggest that we just forget it in these circumstances.

BTW, did the Church used to quote Corinthians when the head covering rule was in effect? I’m still curious to know about why Corinthians goes on to say:

Anyways, it would seem that those who think that we MUST wear head coverings because of the Corinthians verse should think that we should be wearing them 24/7 in case the need to pray arose unexpectedly. Our Church definitely doesn’t bind us to do this.
This is the specific quotes about a veil…
But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled brings shame upon her head, for it is one and the same thing as if she had had her head shaved.
For if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well have her hair cut off. But if it is shameful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should wear a veil.

Note how it says that if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well cut her hair off?
Her hair, according to this USCCB site, showed that she was not a lesbian nor prostitute, in that day.
However by stating that if she does not have her head veiled she may as well cut her hair, shows how important it is.

usccb.org/nab/bible/1corinthians/1corinthians11.htm
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
No, I wear my scapular under my shirt. But it shows through my white uniform issued shirt. I wear it anyway, and if anyone were to ask me what it is, I would tell them it is a sacramental of the Catholic Church, and a sign of devotion to the Holy Mother of God.
Me too!
Of course it would be enough, and I commend you for wearing one. I simply meant that it is not neccessary to coordinate the chapel cap to match one’s dress. And the outward sign of interior humility I mentioned is to show it to God, not to the the world
Oh I didn’t mean it was neccessary either.
I was just looking for a way for the ladies who would like to cover their heads to think outside the box.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Where exactly is the Cannon Law that removed the requirement to cover our head? You’ve got me curious on this.
Can. 6 §1 When this Code comes into force, the following are abrogated:
1° the Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1917
;

Now I’m sure you’ll go on to argue further. Let me know if Jimmy Aking missed one of your arguments in this article: jimmyakin.org/2004/07/head_coverings_.html
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
This is the specific quotes about a veil…
But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled brings shame upon her head, for it is one and the same thing as if she had had her head shaved.
For if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well have her hair cut off. But if it is shameful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should wear a veil.

Note how it says that if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well cut her hair off?
Her hair, according to this USCCB site, showed that she was not a lesbian nor prostitute, in that day.
However by stating that if she does not have her head veiled she may as well cut her hair, shows how important it is.

usccb.org/nab/bible/1corinthians/1corinthians11.htm
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
This is the specific quotes about a veil…
But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled brings shame upon her head, for it is one and the same thing as if she had had her head shaved.
For if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well have her hair cut off. But if it is shameful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should wear a veil.

Note how it says that if a woman does not have her head veiled, she may as well cut her hair off?
Her hair, according to this USCCB site, showed that she was not a lesbian nor prostitute, in that day.
However by stating that if she does not have her head veiled she may as well cut her hair, shows how important it is.

usccb.org/nab/bible/1corinthians/1corinthians11.htm
I don’t know if anyone is quibbling over hat vs. veils but my Pope Leo XIII age Bible says “not covered” not “unveiled”. Found that interesting.

Now on to the serious stuff…netmil(name removed by moderator), you failed to address this part of my post:
And you carry these both with you 24/7? You see where I’m going with this? I’m pretty sure there many occasions where people spontaneously pray without there chapel caps on. How about Grace? Even the SSPXers I know don’t throw it on when they say Grace or when they ask God to grant them more patience. If we actually had to where a head covering everytime we prayed, a whole lot less praying would be done. I can think of a few times this week where I wouldn’t have been able to throw on a chapel cap to pray. Do you suggest that we just forget it in these circumstances.
Anyways, it would seem that those who think that we MUST wear head coverings because of the Corinthians verse should think that we should be wearing them 24/7 in case the need to pray arose unexpectedly. Our Church definitely doesn’t bind us to do this.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
Where exactly is the Cannon Law that removed the requirement to cover our head? You’ve got me curious on this.
Men wearing Hats in Church thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddimitro
Yes, the requirement for a lady to be veiled in a church or before the Blessed Sacrament (e.g. during a sick call) is still Canon Law.

Although not specifically mentioned in the revisions of 1983, I can support my claim with the following: (from 1983)

Canon 20 A later law abrogates or derogates from an earlier law, if
it expressly so states, or if it is directly contrary to that law, or if it integrally reorders the whole subject matter of the earlier law. A universal law, however, does not derogate from a particular or from a special law, unless the law expressly provides otherwise. [emphasis mine]

Canon 21 In doubt, the revocation of a previous law is *not *presumed; rather, later laws are to be related to earlier ones and, as far as possible, harmonized with them. [emphasis mine]

So, since it was specifically mentioned in the Canon Law of 1917, Canon 1262 (quoted below) and not again mentioned in the revision, it holds:

“…mulieres autem, capite cooperto et modeste vestitae, maxime cum ad mensam Dominicam accedunt.” (the non-literal translation is that ladies should be dressed modestly with head covered, especially when approaching the Holy Table.)

Whether or not it’s enforced is not the issue. The issue is that it is still Canon Law.
DD

1917 Canon Law (Latin): mercaba.org/Codigo/1917_1161-1289.htm
1983 Canon Law: ourladyswarriors.org/canon/c0007-0022.htm

I am not an expert in Canon Law, but I do not think the above is correct. This writer cites Canon 20 of the 1983 Code:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddimitro
…Canon 20 A later law abrogates or derogates from an earlier law, if it expressly so states, or if it is directly contrary to that law, or if it integrally reorders the whole subject matter of the earlier law. A universal law, however, does not derogate from a particular or from a special law, unless the law expressly provides otherwise…

Now please note that Canon 6 of the 1983 Code abrogates the entire 1917 Code of Canon Law, including Canon 1262 of that Code:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1983 Code of Canon Law
…Can. 6 §1. When this Code takes force, the following are abrogated:
1/ the Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1917
;…

Reference: vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2.HTM

Unless there is a Canon in the 1983 Code addressing this subject, or unless there is some binding law concerning this subject in some other source not abrogated by Canon 6, it would seem that this particular requirement is indeed no longer binding under Law.

As I have said, though, I am not an expert in Canon Law, and I will readily stand corrected if someone more knowledgeable will clarify this.
 
40.png
bear06:
Now on to the serious stuff…netmil(name removed by moderator), you failed to address this part of my post:
Actually, I have chosen to wear a scarf most times.
For formal prayer I put a chapel cap on top.
 
I always wore a hat to Church. My mother had matching hat’s to our good coats and it just stuck. I starting picking out hats myself at 10 and I have them for all my coats. I even wear them without a coat (skin cancer).
I go to the TLM. It is not demanded but they do prefer women to cover their head’s. Most do, a few don’t, only if the viel nazi is there is it a problem (she get’s told to leave quite a bit for harassing women). I wear a hat with my coat but switch to a veil as I get hot. My veil covers all my hair to my shoulders, just my bangs peak out. I keep my veil in my purse with my rosary beads and have a spare in the car just in case (sometimes my mother comes with me). Most of the family’s are huge in my Church and they tend to keep the veils in the car so they don’t forget. Since most of us have backup they always have someone to borrow from.
Since our admin won’t let us have adoration a group of us go to another Church (NO) that is centrally located and we wear our veils. During the most recent 40 hours of adoration by the second night the veiled population increased quite a bit. I guess all the other women were just waiting to feel confortable about bringing them out.
I say if it feels right to wear one then do it. Anyone who criticizes you it is really their problem and not your’s. I have to say the only people who ever question my veil or modest dress are women and not men. We really are our own worst enemies.
My best friend is muslem(not practicing) and she loves to send her family pix of me with the veil. Her mother has sent me some lovely head scarves that I wear to Church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top