Women.... stupid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cute2904
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Have not Catholic Saints said that woman where evil even worse IMO than being called “stupid”.

***The following are statements of canonized saints of Christianity concerning women: ***
"Woman is the daughter of falsehood, a sentinel of Hell, the enemy of peace; through her Adam lost paradise. (St. John Damascene)".
"Woman is the arm of the Devil, her voice is the hissing of the serpent. (St. Anthony)".

***“Woman has the poison of an asp, the malice of a dragon. (St. Gregory the Great)”. ***
 
I believe we have found one of these topics which take a historical and possibly cultural mentality and attempt to place it in a modern context.

There have been many injustices precipitated on many human beings throughout history, and I cannot think of one group that is innocent of this.

Please feel free to continue the discussion in a charitable and professional manner.
 
40.png
Karin:
Have not Catholic Saints said that woman where evil even worse IMO than being called “stupid”.

***The following are statements of canonized saints of Christianity concerning women: ***
"Woman is the daughter of falsehood, a sentinel of Hell, the enemy of peace; through her Adam lost paradise. (St. John Damascene)".
"Woman is the arm of the Devil, her voice is the hissing of the serpent. (St. Anthony)".

***“Woman has the poison of an asp, the malice of a dragon. (St. Gregory the Great)”. ***
Ouch.
it’s become so common that it’s almost expected… that those who wish to attack islam and try to find fault in it will always quote from the books that contain numerous weak narrations, including israelite traditions, books such as at-tabaree’s taareekh and ibn ishaaq’s seerah.
Of course they do this, because if one actually looks at the Quraan or the authentic sunnah, they will never find the “damaging” information they are looking for. Rather, it was Islaam that gave women many rights they Christian women did not have. Christianity darn near condemns women and blames everything on Eve. Whereas, Islaam teaches that Adam and Eve both sinned, that they both asked for forgiveness, and that they were both forgiven. End of story. The purpose was to show that our Creator is a forgiving and Merciful Lord.

It is amazing how many Christians try, aimlessly, to attack the “status of women” according to the teachings of Islaam, which realistically, there is nothing there to attack. Yet, they do not even look at their own book, or as Karin pointed out, the statements of their “saints”.

“Woman is the daughter of falsehood, a sentinel of Hell, the enemy of peace.”

“Woman is the arm of the devil.”

:eek:
 
the very first narration you quoted from at-tabaree isn’t from islamic doctrine, its source is judeao-christian doctrine. so who’s doctrine is bad?
What seems to be missing is the link from the islamic narration back to the alleged judeo-christian doctrine. In other words, the narrative is given in an islamic source as coming from a judeo-christian source; but what is the actual judeo-christian source material leading to that narration? What I’m looking for is a textual history.
 
Hi Cute2904,
“Most Indonesian (muslims) hate jews. I have no idea why they hate jews. Indo has never been in contact with any jewish group or even have international diplomatical relationship. But they do hate jews simply because all their brothers around the world hate the jews. Saying terrorist are the fanatics one was not totally right. Many independent groups in Indonesia(particularly) do send their youngsters to learn terrorism in the South Philippines, when they finished they are ready to send as jihadis to the conflict areas (poso, ambon, afghanistan etc). These are the people who really follow their faith truely according to their Koran and Hadith.”–Cute 2904

Where there is hate, there is no love. Where there is no love, there is no God.People that choose hate are not following God no matter what religion they ‘claim’ to be following.The ones you refer to are Muslim in name only and not following God.–nicolo
 
Dear Gonzales,
no, this is not what was said. what was said was that what are called “israa’eeliyyaat (israelite traditions)” originate from judeo-christian stories, not from islamic beliefs. you find these narrations in books of tafseer (Quranic commentaries) and taareekh (books on history - particuarly pertaining to history prior to islam). as was quoted earlier, “such material was used very little by the sahaba (the prophet’s companions), but more by the tabi’un (the generation after the companions) and even more by later generations.”
Why was that? Isn’t Quran a complete and clear Book that tells all the stories of the prophets?
hadeeths are important in islam. within its body is contained the second source of islamic legislation. the problem here is that non-muslims who often quote from the books written or compiled by muslim scholars don’t know how to distinuguish between what is a hadeeth and what is not - which has clearly been demonstrated here by some members.
Are Bukhari, Tabari, Musnad Ahmad hadiths? I notice that cute uses Bukhari, and I thought Bukhari is a sahih hadith.
perhaps reading some of the articles found here may aid you in understanding how women are viewed in islam: thetruereligion.org/modules/…php?category=17
I will read it, my friend.
Have not Catholic Saints said that woman where evil even worse IMO than being called “stupid”.
Was it stated by Jesus?
Of course they do this, because if one actually looks at the Quraan or the authentic sunnah, they will never find the “damaging” information they are looking for. Rather, it was Islaam that gave women many rights they Christian women did not have. Christianity darn near condemns women and blames everything on Eve. Whereas, Islaam teaches that Adam and Eve both sinned, that they both asked for forgiveness, and that they were both forgiven. End of story. The purpose was to show that our Creator is a forgiving and Merciful Lord.
Of course, may be Quran gives more rights then to Christian Women.
For example, in Bible, Maria Magdalene, Deborah, don’t have any proper right. But as long as I know, in Bible God punished everyone, and didn’t blame anything on Eve. I might be wrong, so please check it.
Yes, sure, we can see in the Moslem countries, the women have more rights than in the Western countries.
Even in the past, except when the women were the captures from war. If they were so, they could be slaves. And slaves could be harrassed.
Where there is hate, there is no love. Where there is no love, there is no God.People that choose hate are not following God no matter what religion they ‘claim’ to be following.The ones you refer to are Muslim in name only and not following God.–nicolo
You are a very wise person, brother Nico. But if you reject your own religion, Islam, do you think Allah will not treat it as a sin?

Fox
 
Hi DeExupery,
"You are a very wise person, brother Nico. But if you reject your own religion, Islam, do you think Allah will not treat it as a sin?–DeExupery
I thank you kindly for calling me wise, but I am not wise. All wisdom comes from God.
I am not a Muslim and never have been. I don’t reject my religion–I have no denomination or ‘label’. I love God(Allah).–nicolo
 
I think it is important to keep in mind here, that Christianity believes that damnation and salvation BOTH came into the world through woman, not just the former. Both damnation and salvation were, however, primarily wrought by man: Adam and Christ (God-Man). It was because Adam sinned, that the whole fate of humanity was sealed, and his seed polluted with the disobedience of God. It was because Christ atoned for this sin, that the gates of Heaven were re-opened to mankind. Eve ‘gave birth’ to sin by seducing Adam, but Mary ‘gave birth’ to salvation by bearing the Son of God.

I hope this isn’t offensive, but isn’t the Qu’ran a ‘reinterpretation’ of Jewish Scripture in many parts? A retelling of the story?

Karin said:
***The following are statements of canonized saints of Christianity concerning women: ***
"Woman is the daughter of falsehood, a sentinel of Hell, the enemy of peace; through her Adam lost paradise. (St. John Damascene)".
"Woman is the arm of the Devil, her voice is the hissing of the serpent. (St. Anthony)".

***“Woman has the poison of an asp, the malice of a dragon. (St. Gregory the Great)”. ***

As is to be expected, and as r.gonzales mentioned above relating another quote on Islam, these quotes are taken horribly out of context with respect to Christian Tradition. One need only look at the vast multitude of canonized women in the Church, as well as the formidable array of Saints devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God, not to mention the personal example of Jesus recorded in the Gospels, to see how highly praised is the female sex.

Here is another quote from the same St. John Damascene mentioned above (who, by the way, lived under Islamic rule and served as an officer in the court of the Caliph):

In You, O Woman, Full of Grace,
the angelic choirs and the human race -
all creation rejoices! All creation rejoices! (
1)
O Sanctified Temple, Mystical Paradise and
Glory of Virgins, He, Who is our God, from
before all ages, took flesh from You and became
a child! He made Your womb a throne! A throne
greater than the heavens! In You, O Woman,
Full of Grace, In You, O Woman, Full of Grace,
all creation rejoices, all creation rejoices! All
praise be to You! All praise be to You! All
praise be to you!


So here you can see how the first quote, which *specifically *discusses Eve, would be taken horribly out of context relative to the thinking of this great Christian Saint regarding women in general and their crucial role in salvation. The above hymn “is one of the great tributes of the Eastern Church to the Virgin Mary,
Mother of God.”
["]http://www.byzantines.net/epiphany/theotokos.htm#fn_02]]("http://www.byzantines.net/epiphany/theotokos.htm#fn_02)
Similar cases apply to the other two quotes mentioned.

Karin, and everyone,
please specifically cite your sources for quotes
to refrain from misleading people (like poor jcaz, or yourself)!
😉

God Bless!
 
40.png
Karin:
Have not Catholic Saints said that woman where evil even worse IMO than being called “stupid”.
***The following are statements of canonized saints of Christianity concerning women: ***
"Woman is the daughter of falsehood, a sentinel of Hell, the enemy of peace; through her Adam lost paradise. (St. John Damascene)".
"Woman is the arm of the Devil, her voice is the hissing of the serpent. (St. Anthony)".

***“Woman has the poison of an asp, the malice of a dragon. (St. Gregory the Great)”. ***
Despite of you being tu quoque here like the other muslims on every debate. It is wiser if you also could provide the link for us to read completely.
 
40.png
DeExupery:
Why was that? Isn’t Quran a complete and clear Book that tells all the stories of the prophets?
i don’t personally know why the later generations began reporting israelite traditions in their books of history and Quranic commentaries. perhaps it was to give a fuller picture of some of the stories mentioned regarding the prophets and peoples of the past.

as for the Quran being a complete and clear book, Allah says in the Quran that there are clear verses and obscure verses and that those who have deviations in their hearts will rely upon the obscure verses to support their errors (i cannot recall the exact reference at the moment as i’m paraphrasing from memory). Allah also tells us in the Quran that with regards to the prophets and peoples of the past, He has told us about some of them, and has remained silent about others (i.e., has not told us of their stories - i do not recall the exact reference for this verse either as i’m also referring to it from memory).
40.png
DeExupery:
Are Bukhari, Tabari, Musnad Ahmad hadiths? I notice that cute uses Bukhari, and I thought Bukhari is a sahih hadith.
firstly, the term “hadeeth” refers to a report conveying a statement by prophet muhammad, an action he did, a tacit approval of his for a statement or action by someone else, or a description of him.

saheeh al-bukhaaree and musnad al-imam ahmad are compilations of hadeeth, where as the reference to at-tabaree is either a reference to his Quranic commentary entitled, “jaami’ al-bayaan 'an ta’weel aay al-Quran” or his book on history, known as “at-taareekh” - althought both these works by at-tabaree contain many hadeeths, they are not considered hadeeth compilations.

as for saheeh al-bukhaaree in specific, as i mentioned it is a compilation of hadeeths selected by al-imam al-bukhaaree using very strict criteria for authenticity. it is arranged in chapters of islamic jurisprudence and is considered by the muslims (with the exception of the shee’ah and the various sects that branch off from them) to be the most authentic collection of hadeeths available.
 
Well… that article certainly undermines the credibility even further! Unfortunately Karin, above-linked article merely does exactly what you did: quoting completely out of context to manipulate words in proving a point from a straw man. 😦
In any case, the Church Fathers whom you quote specifically refer to Eve and her influence, and not women in general. It is flat-out false to accuse the Judeo-Christian tradition of placing the entire blame for Original Sin on Eve’s shoulders. In fact it is most often referred to as ‘the Sin of Adam.’
One good way to judge a system of beliefs are by the fruits that it produces. How does the Christian world respect women in comparison with the Islamic? How does that reflect on the underlying belief structures of each?

As far as Patriarchal religion… it’s important to realize that if it wasn’t for patriarchy, civilization as we know it simply would not exist. Humanity for hundreds of thousands of years, throughout the Paleolithic Age, was matriarchal–families consisted of one mother with rotating fathers. This sort of society still exists in native cultures of Africa, the Americas and South-east Asia. It was Patriarchal society which pulled mankind out of the stone age. It is not a ‘domination’ of men over women, as some feminists today would like to describe (although unfortunately over time this is what resulted) it is simply the bond of sexual loyalty which a wife would give to her husband, in order to ensure him that his children are legitimate. It is the creation of the two-parent family unit.

A good example in the ancient world of the benefits of Patriarchy vs. Matriarchy could be seen in early Roman society, which consisted of two parallel classes: Plebians (matriarchal) and Patricians (patriarchal). The former grew out of the relatively primitive Matriarchal Etruscan culture. Suffice it to say, the Patricians (families where the father was head of the family) prospered, became wealthy and powerful, eventually becoming the ruling nobility in the Republic and Empire.
[interesting read http://www.mugu.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/Garbage_Generation?embedded=yes&cumulative_category_title=Introduction;Subjects;Humanities;Sociology&cumulative_category_id=Root;Library;Humanities;Sociology”]here]
 
40.png
Neithan:
Well… that article certainly undermines the credibility even further! Unfortunately Karin, above-linked article merely does exactly what you did: quoting completely out of context to manipulate words in proving a point from a straw man. 😦
In any case, Fathers whom you quote specifically refer to Eve and her part influence, and not women in general. It is flat-out false to accuse the Judeo-Christian tradition of placing the entire blame for Original Sin on Eve’s shoulders. In fact it is most often referred to as ‘the Sin of Adam.’
One good way to judge a system of beliefs are by the fruits that it produces. How does the Christian world respect women in comparison with the Islamic? How does that reflect on the underlying belief structures of each?
As to taking a quote out of context…exactly…that was my point. Anything can be taken out of context unless you know the teaching etc. behind something…I see many Catholics doing this to Muslim quotes etc. and vice versa.
 
Dear Gonzales,

I am starting to read the site you mentioned, but one articles really shocked me:

Some of the article made by Mary Ali and Anjum Ali seems a bit strange…Please enlighten me:
Actually, the women’s liberation movement was not begun by women but was revealed by God to a man in the seventh century by the name of Muhammad (Peace be upon him), who is known as the last Prophet of Islam.
With my little knowledge, weren’t women before Mohammed PBUH time free? For example, Khadijah, were a rich and liberated woman. And the Pagans worshipped Gods, if I am not mistaken, one of them is a Godess.
Islam, fourteen centuries ago, made women equally accountable to God in glorifying and worshipping Him – setting no limits on her moral progress.
I don’t know, but aren’t Women unable to be imam? I might be wrong so please enlighten me. Because I have many moslem friends and it seems that the women are much more pious than the men in average.
In Islam, a woman has the basic freedoms of choice and expression based on recognition of her individual personality. First, she is free to choose her religion. The Qur’an states: “There is no compulsion in religion. Right has been made distinct from error.” (2:256)
Gonzales, this is not what happened in moslem countries. I heard that apostasy can get you killed. Not only women, but men too.
A Muslim woman chooses her husband and keeps her name after marriage. A Muslim woman’s testimony is valid in legal disputes. In fact, where women are more familiar, their evidence is conclusive.
Gonzales, I don’t know what the writers are talking about. how could they lie? In the Islamic court, a woman testimony is half the man. And I don’t think it’s moslem woman who chooses her husband. Usually the husband and the parents of the woman. I might be wrong, but please enlighten it. Even in Mohammad PBUH time, when he married Aisyah, He consulted with Abu Bakar, and I never heard a story where Aisyah was asked about this marriage.
I also heard from several source that a moslem man has a right to beat his wife if he suspects of infidelity. Please enlighten me. And men can take up to 4 wives. In my own country this is practised by some people.
The Prophet(S) said, “seeking knowledge is a mandate for every Muslim (male and female)”. This includes knowledge of the Qur’an and the Hadith as well as other knowledge. Men and women both have the capacity for learning and understanding. Since it is also their obligation to promote good behavior and condemn bad behavior in all spheres of life, Muslim women must acquire the appropriate education to perform this duty in accordance with their own natural talents and interests.
This is not what happened in moslem countries. This happens in western countries.
A right given to Muslim women by God 1400 years ago is the right to vote. On any public matter, a woman may voice her opinion and participate in politics. One example, as narrated in the Qur’an (60:12), Muhammad(S) is told that when the believing women come to him and swear their allegiance to Islam, he must accept their oath. This established the right of women to select their leader and publicly declare so. Finally, Islam does not forbid a woman from holding important positions in government. Abdurrahman Ibn Affan consulted many women before he recommended Uthman Ibn Affan to be the Caliph.
In my country, when Megawati was elected as president, many Islamists told that it was against Al Quran that a Woman leads. Please enlighten me, dear Gonzales.
The Qur’an an states: “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend of their wealth (for the support of women).” (4:34)
Is this really true that Quran states men excel women? And I remember I read somewhere that the inheritance for women are smaller.

Dear Gonzales, the article I read is purely nonsense to my believe. Especially when it is said that the women in Islam is treated better than women in the West. What do you think?

Please enlighten me if what I said is wrong. I try to read with my own logic.

Fox
 
40.png
Karin:
As to taking a quote out of context…exactly…that was my point. Anything can be taken out of context unless you know the teaching etc. behind something…I see many Catholics doing this to Muslim quotes etc. and vice versa.
hadith is used to support koran. dont you read my quote regarding the hadith in this thread? :confused:
Hadith “is the commentary on the Qur’an and its explanation”[2] This is why almost all commentaries rely in the first place on the Hadith to explain the Qur’an. The authentic Hadith is believed to be
“nothing short of revelation, [for the Qur’an says of Mohammad] “he does not speak out of low desires. It is not but inspiration which is inspired (Q. 53:3-4).” The only difference between the Qur’an and the Hadith is that whereas the former was revealed directly through Gabriel with the very letters that are embodied from Allah, the latter was revealed without letters and words.”[3] “Thus, next to the Holy Qur’an, the Hadith is the second source of the Islamic Law of social and personal behaviour, because the commandments of the Holy Prophet are as binding on the believers as the commandments of Allah. ‘Whenever Allah and the Apostle have decided a matter, it is not for a faithful man or woman to follow a course of their own choice (Q. 33:36).’”[4]
The Hadith is to be followed exactly “for that which differs from the Hadith to the extent of a hair shall be given up.”[5]
“A Muslim therefore stands in absolute need of a copy of the Qur’an and a copy of the Hadith for the guidance of his life”[6]
 
40.png
DeExupery:
I don’t know, but aren’t Women unable to be imam? I might be wrong so please enlighten me. Because I have many moslem friends and it seems that the women are much more pious than the men in average.
Catholic also ban women to be priest. Any explanation from catholics fellow here would be great.
Even in Mohammad PBUH time, when he married Aisyah, He consulted with Abu Bakar, and I never heard a story where Aisyah was asked about this marriage.
Fox, She couldnt make up her mind. She’s just only six years old. Thats why her father decide for her.
I also heard from several source that a moslem man has a right to beat his wife if he suspects of infidelity. Please enlighten me. And men can take up to 4 wives. In my own country this is practised by some people.
Beat wife is as legal as having 4 wives.
Dear Gonzales, the article I read is purely nonsense to my believe. Especially when it is said that the women in Islam is treated better than women in the West. What do you think?
You mean treat women like a queen? 😛
 
40.png
cute2904:
Catholic also ban women to be priest. Any explanation from catholics fellow here would be great.
I hate to be too anal, but ‘ban’ isn’t the right word. Given the nature of our Sacraments and Sacred Tradition it isn’t possible for a woman to be a priest. Would you like the long explanation or the short one?
Basically, Christ was incarnate as a man. His purpose was to sacrifice His Body. The Priest’s primary function is to ‘re-present’ this sacrifice at the Holy Mass in the Eucharist. Since we place heavy importance on the physical substances of a Sacrament, it is fitting that the priest who is ‘re-presenting’ Christ’s sacrifice has the same physical body.
The importance and reasoning behind this would lead me into the long explanation…

Although women may not be priests, they are not ‘second-class citizens’ in the Kingdom of God. Far from it. They are open to religious consecration (nuns) which is another holy ministry in the Church. Also, the most holy and important purely human being in Catholic theology is a woman: Mary, the Mother of God. She is called the ‘Living Tabernacle,’ the ‘Seat of Wisdom’ and the ‘City of God.’ She is Queen of Heaven, higher than all the Angels and Saints in Glory.

The fact that women give birth to new life more than makes up for their exclusion from the priesthood. Sometimes I think God was compensating a little here. 😉

I highly recommend the Catholic Theology of the Body to shed further enlightenment on this subject.
 
40.png
DeExupery:
With my little knowledge, weren’t women before Mohammed PBUH time free? For example, Khadijah, were a rich and liberated woman. And the Pagans worshipped Gods, if I am not mistaken, one of them is a Godess.
perhaps reading this might give you a glimpse of what pre-islamic arabian society was like: social life of the arabs taken from “the sealed nectar: biography of prophet muhammad”.

also, some specific points:
  • women did not have he right of inheritance.
  • women did not have any rights upon her husband. divorce had no limited number, no limit to the number of wives a man could marry. women were more like possessions than life partners, such that if her husband died, her husband’s oldest son would have more right to her and he would consider her an inheritnce just like the rest of his father’s wealth.
40.png
DeExupery:
but aren’t Women unable to be imam?
if the congregation consists of all women, then a woman can be an imam leading the prayer. in prayers where the congregation consists of both men and women, no. a woman cannot be an imam to lead the prayer. btw, how does the fact that a woman is not allowed to leads the prayer for mixed congregational prayer set limits on her moral progress?
40.png
DeExupery:
Gonzales, this is not what happened in moslem countries. I heard that apostasy can get you killed. Not only women, but men too.
the verse quoted does not apply to those already within the fold of islam. that verse applies to those who the muslims call to islam. muslims are prohibited from forcing non-muslims to accept islam. however, if a muslim apostates from islam, then he is tried and called back to islam. if he refuses, his punishment is death by stoning - and this punishment is to be carried out by the muslim ruler.
40.png
DeExupery:
how could they lie? In the Islamic court, a woman testimony is half the man.
just because you don’t agree with what is written in the article it means they lied? this article is about the issue regarding the testimonies of women in court and why the testimonies of two women equal the testimony of one man:
thetruereligion.org/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=41 .
40.png
DeExupery:
And I don’t think it’s moslem woman who chooses her husband. Usually the husband and the parents of the woman. I might be wrong, but please enlighten it. Even in Mohammad PBUH time, when he married Aisyah, He consulted with Abu Bakar, and I never heard a story where Aisyah was asked about this marriage.
I also heard from several source that a moslem man has a right to beat his wife if he suspects of infidelity. Please enlighten me. And men can take up to 4 wives. In my own country this is practised by some people.
the practice of muslims today and what the religion stipulates are two different things. islamically a woman is allowed to reject a suitor if she is not pleased with him. if a woman has reached the age of maturity, she also has the right to propose to any man of her choosing. a man is limited to four wifes and this is a right bestowed upon them by Allah. as mentioned above, before islam, there was no limit to how many wives a man could marry. there are also conditions for marrying more than one wife, the most important one being just and fair treatment of each wife.

as for a man’s “right to beat his wife”, you’re referring to the verse in the Quran where Allah says, “and those whose hostility you fear, then admonish them, and keep away from them in the beds, and hit them. so if they obey you, then do not seek any means against them.” (4:34) this verse outlines the means a husband should take against his wife who is causing marital discord. first he is to admonish her. if this fails and she persists, then he is to keep away from her bed. if this fails and she persists, then he is given the allowance to hit her. this allowance carries the general restrictions of the forbiddance of striking another human being in the face, of causing bodily harm or injury. and the scholars of islam have explained this hitting as such that it does not cause bruising or breaking of bones. this verse is not an all out allowance for the husband to pummel his wife at the first instance of discord as some people try to make it out to be.
40.png
DeExupery:
This is not what happened in moslem countries. This happens in western countries.
no, this happens in muslim countries as well. in fact, it’s easier for a woman to gain vast amounts of knowledge in muslim countries due to the fact that more muslim scholars live in muslim countries than non-muslim countries. i know of a few women scholars who have excelled in their learning further than a lot of men i know.

as for the rest of your questions, i’ll reply to them when i have more time, if Allah wills.
 
40.png
DeExupery:
…in Bible God punished everyone…
I’ll say …

If a period was Eve’s punishment, who was being punished via PMS? Poor Adam.

hahahahahahaha

😉

no flames from the ladies here, please … i’m only trying to make light here.

cheers!

michel
 
40.png
Neithan:
these quotes are taken horribly out of context
just out of curiousity, what was the context of those statements then?

i mean, even if Allah’s statement, “men are responsible over women because Allah has preferred some of them over others and because they spend from their wealth” contained a hint of degradation towards women, it doesn’t even come close to what one is sure to take from those statements in and of themselves…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top