World War III is Prophesized

  • Thread starter Thread starter Righteousone
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Righteousone

Guest
We know from the third secret of Fatima, we know from the many apparitions of Our Lady, it is revealed that there will be a Third World War. It will be a war that will break out from East to West, all of a sudden.
There will be a massive invasion of Europe by Muslim, and there will be massive acts of terrorism by Muslim in Europe and in North America, and in Asia,wherever Muslim are found. It will be coordinated worldwide, Jihad. And they all, with boldness, will attack what they call the mushriks, to kill as many of them as they can.
The Muslims have not understood the promise of Mohammed is bogus. The penny has not dropped for them yet; the connection has not been made in their minds.
The Saracens were kicked out of Europe. The Moors were kicked out of the Iberian Peninsula. the Turks attacked Malta at the beginning of their war of conquest to make Europe a Mohammedan continent. Ninety warships full of Turkish warriors were defeated by the army of 1,500 fighting monks of the order of St. John, with the help of their Maltese natives.
And then the turks were going to attack again. The Turkish leader, Suleiman the Magnificant, had misgivings, in spite of the vast military superiority of his forces. He said:
“I fear more the prayers of pope Pius V, than all the warships of Venice”. And he had good reason to fear the prayers of pope Pius V, because pope Pius V proclaimed a crusade. It is for Mohammedans the dirtiest word in human language: CRUSADE.
 
Heck, even governmental (secular) intelligence services are saying this. In a secular context and politically correct manner.

Personally, I make it no later than 2020 (12 years), but possibly earlier.
 
We are not immune to World War III.

But I don’t think you’ll find a responsible Catholic who believes that the third secret is about World War III. If I’m not mistaken, the third secret has already been revealed; It was about the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, which - incidently - took place on the anniversary of the first Fatima appartition, May 13th 1981, by Mehmet Ali Hagca.
 
Righteousone said:
We know from the third secret of Fatima, we know from the many apparitions of Our Lady, it is revealed that there will be a Third World War.
Click to expand...
I’ve had great interest in the events of Fatima and a Third World War was not one of the things warned of. (WWII was) Even with the approved apparition of Our Lady of Akita, which has some grave warnings, a Third World War is not among them.

Fatima (and Akita for that matter) spoke of conversion, prayer and the Holy Eucharist as “solutions” to peace. Calling the faithful to be faithful to avoid self-destruction. Fatima also indicated a religious persecution that the world appears to have been spared. Akita also warned of religious persecution and great division in the Church, as well as the symbol of fire, which may indicate God’s justice on the world.

Yet, as with all these events, they are a call to conversion. A sign of hope.
 
Listen to this one…the Muslim still did not learn their lesson, and they beseiged Vienna with a vast force. They so incredibly outnumbered the Christian forces that there was no possibility, humanly speaking, of defeating them. The Muslims were routed and they fled. They didn’t even have time to pick up their coffee and take it with them. The Europeans enjoyed the spoils of war, and that is how coffee became popular in Europe. the Turks were defeated again.
Somehow, the five thousand angels promised by Mohammed never showed up on their side. On whose side did they show up to defend? Well, pope St. Leo pointed to heaven and that army of angels became visible. Likewise with the reconquest of Spain, when the Moors were driven out at the place called Covadunga.
A shrine has been built their in memory of that great battle that began that reconquest, kicking the Muslims out, sending them back to Arab lands in which they came from. An angel was seen coming down from heaven riding a horse, and he had a great saber in his hand.
The angels do come down from heaven, but to give victory to the Christians, not to the Muslim.
The day will come and it was foretold by Our Lady herself to sister Eleen Aiello, that the Arabs will convert to the Catholic faith. Russia will convert to the Catholic faith, we know b/c our Lady of Fatima verified her promise with the miracle of the sun. A miracle that could only be worked by God.
This is why we need not fear…the angels of heaven will come again and they will destroy the Godless. They will destroy all that is unholy. It is not for the Christian to wage Jihad, but rather to respond to the unholy Jihad, with the Holy Crusade.
And the assistance of the angels, and the armies and legions of angels, is with the disciples and followers of Christ. And it must be so, because Our Lord’s promise does not have an expiration date. “Behold, I am with you ALL days, even until the consummation of the world”.
 
Charlie_Zeaiter said:
We are not immune to World War III.

But I don’t think you’ll find a responsible Catholic who believes that the third secret is about World War III. If I’m not mistaken, the third secret has already been revealed; It was about the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, which - incidently - took place on the anniversary of the first Fatima appartition, May 13th 1981, by Mehmet Ali Hagca.
Click to expand...
I get a lot of my information from “The Fatima Crusader”, I think they know what they are talking about. They talk about the third secret which only half was revealed which was about the assasination of the pope, but that wasn’t all to this secret. There was more and it was about the third world war.
 
CathFaith1 said:
Unfortunately the Fatima Crusader is well known to lack authenticity. One of the clergy members who started that campaign is in need of prayers.
Click to expand...
The Law of God and Canon Law itself clearly states (see Canon 221, 1321, and 1323) that no priest in the Catholic church can be suspended or divinis, or penalized with any other ecclestastical penalty if that priest has not committed a crime or transgression of church law or precept.
Since no crime or transgression has ever been committed by or attributed to Father Gruner, it is absolutely clear and certain that he is not suspended from the priesthood.
Any one of any rank whatsoever, who says he is suspended is either ignorant of the facts, misled, or outright malicious.
Thus Father Gruner remains a priest in good standing under the law of the church.
 
Righteousone said:
Listen to this one…the Muslim still did not learn their lesson, and they beseiged Vienna with a vast force. They so incredibly outnumbered the Christian forces that there was no possibility, humanly speaking, of defeating them.
Click to expand...
No offence, but there are plenty of historical precedents of very small and weak forces defeating larger ones.

In the ancient world there were the Greeks who fought the Persians and won, and Julius Caesar defeated a Gaulish force A QUARTER OF A MILLION strong in total.

In the Middle ages there was the Battle of Agincourt where the English defeated a much larger and more heavily armed French force. A generation later the now larger and better-equipped English forces were driven out of France by (among others) St Joan of Arc.

There’s no such thing as a ‘humanly impossible’ victory in battle - if the conditions are right any army can beat any other.
 
Righteousone said:
The Law of God and Canon Law itself clearly states (see Canon 221, 1321, and 1323) that no priest in the Catholic church can be suspended or divinis, or penalized with any other ecclestastical penalty if that priest has not committed a crime or transgression of church law or precept.
Since no crime or transgression has ever been committed by or attributed to Father Gruner, it is absolutely clear and certain that he is not suspended from the priesthood.
Any one of any rank whatsoever, who says he is suspended is either ignorant of the facts, misled, or outright malicious.
Thus Father Gruner remains a priest in good standing under the law of the church.
Click to expand...
How do you know that no crime or transgression has ever been committed by Fr Gruner or attributed to him? Are you privy to all the details of his life and all the details of the case against him?

I’m pretty certain disobedience to one’s superiors, especially when one is a priest vowed to obedience, would in and of itself constitute such a crime and/or transgression. And just as certain that it was probably some instance of such disobedience that led to his suspension.
 
Righteousone said:
The Law of God and Canon Law itself clearly states (see Canon 221, 1321, and 1323) that no priest in the Catholic church can be suspended or divinis, or penalized with any other ecclestastical penalty if that priest has not committed a crime or transgression of church law or precept.
Since no crime or transgression has ever been committed by or attributed to Father Gruner, it is absolutely clear and certain that he is not suspended from the priesthood.
** Any one of any rank whatsoever, who says he is suspended is either ignorant of the facts, misled, or outright malicious.**
Thus Father Gruner remains a priest in good standing under the law of the church.
Click to expand...
Referring to the text in bold, another possibility is that they are better informed. Many people proclaim their innocence. That does not mean they are. Since the Holy See has spoken, to ignore it or claim it does not have jurisdiction or cannot rule is a common tactic of schismatics. We see similar arguments regarding the excommunication of Archbishop Lefevre.

Again referring to the comments in bold, are you saying that Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos was acting maliciously? He certainly was not ignorant of the facts nor was he misled.
 
LilyM said:
No offence, but there are plenty of historical precedents of very small and weak forces defeating larger ones.

In the ancient world there were the Greeks who fought the Persians and won, and Julius Caesar defeated a Gaulish force A QUARTER OF A MILLION strong in total.

In the Middle ages there was the Battle of Agincourt where the English defeated a much larger and more heavily armed French force. A generation later the now larger and better-equipped English forces were driven out of France by (among others) St Joan of Arc.

There’s no such thing as a ‘humanly impossible’ victory in battle - if the conditions are right any army can beat any other.
Click to expand...
Echoing this, Alexander the Great, with only about 30,000 troops defeated Darius III in 331 BC who had about 100,000 troops in the field. The Battle of Gaugumela (sp?) is one of the most famous and important in history.

However, this does not take anything away from the FACT that God helped to protect Europe from being overrun by Moslem invaders. That God worked through men to do this does not in any way detract from His grace.
 
I seem to remember the prohecy that if the consecration of Russia was properly done there would be a certain era of peace. And Sister Lucia before her death confirmed that it was carried out in accordance with Our Lady’s wishes. So WHAT is everyone worried about?
 
goofyjim said:
I seem to remember the prohecy that if the consecration of Russia was properly done there would be a certain era of peace. And Sister Lucia before her death confirmed that it was carried out in accordance with Our Lady’s wishes. So WHAT is everyone worried about?
Click to expand...
Father Gruner of the “Fatima Crusade” claims that Russia was not properly consecrated. He is not alone in this. This is a common assertion by many “ultra-traditionalists” as well as others who seem to have limited trust in the Holy See.
 
rpp said:
Echoing this, Alexander the Great, with only about 30,000 troops defeated Darius III in 331 BC who had about 100,000 troops in the field. The Battle of Gaugumela (sp?) is one of the most famous and important in history.

However, this does not take anything away from the FACT that God helped to protect Europe from being overrun by Moslem invaders. That God worked through men to do this does not in any way detract from His grace.
Click to expand...
Just like God worked through the godless communists of Vietnam to help rid their country of not one but two superior forces - first the French and then the Americans?

No offence, but the same God who rains on both the just and unjust also occasionally gives victory in battle to the undeserving, y’know, so I wouldn’t go presuming that it was anything other than the chance and ordinary circumstance of that particular conflict that led to the victory.
 
LilyM said:
Just like God worked through the godless communists of Vietnam to help rid their country of not one but two superior forces - first the French and then the Americans?

No offence, but the same God who rains on both the just and unjust also occasionally gives victory in battle to the undeserving, y’know.
Click to expand...
Quite correct. I cannot disagree with this at all. In fact I whole-heartedly agree. I am sorry if I appeared to imply that the victors always just. The fact the Muslims control much of what was once predominantly Christian is evidence of this.

But God has a much different frame of reference. One which my exceptionally little brain cannot even begin to figure out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top