Worship Music (as well as other styles of music) in Evangelical and Catholic Settings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sarabande
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I must add this.

I had a smile on my heart and face the whole Mass and even as I walked to my car after Mass… ❤️
In fact, I carried that smile home with me and I still have it.
 
Beautiful,
That is wonderful! It sounds like you have a parish where they are bringing in the feeling of Lent into their music, by not having instruments during Lent. I believe this is the ideal, and maybe even specified in GIRM, but I think it is vaguely mentioned (instruments can only “support the singing”).

It’s awesome when the priest leads, and the parish chants / sings in response. I wish we could all be so lucky!!
 
All that popcorn is going to make us thirsty. I’ll bring some beer. And to keep it in the spirit of praise and worship, I’ll make sure it’s Belgian Trappist beer 😛
I thought they became Trappists so they wouldn’t have to sing. 🙂
 
I sang at Mass!
I sang at Mass!
I sang at Mass!
I sang at Mass and felt long forgotten joy in my heart.
It has been so long since I actually sang …it all. 🙂
I sang it all!
I can’t remember exactly when I stopped singing so long ago but I can tell you why I did sing this weekend.

There was no choir, cantor or musical instrumentalist. Everyone took the lead of the priest and I heard more people sing at that parish than ever before.

It was amazing!
It was beautiful!
Let the priest lead!
Let the people follow and sing!
Wow!!! I thought this thread was dead. That is so wonderful to hear, Beautiful!!! Sometimes that can work really well, like in your experience. Sometimes it doesn’t. When I’ve been in congregations where there were no instruments or singers and the priest couldn’t sing and no one was really going at it, I’d just sing full-voiced from the pews and then others will join. Then, other times, I’d end up being a “soloist” as a congregant in the pew singing with the priest because no one will sing. I’ve found that it really depends on the congregation and the priest. God bless you. I’m happy you had that experience.
 
Beautiful,
That is wonderful! It sounds like you have a parish where they are bringing in the feeling of Lent into their music, by not having instruments during Lent. I believe this is the ideal, and maybe even specified in GIRM, but I think it is vaguely mentioned (instruments can only “support the singing”).

It’s awesome when the priest leads, and the parish chants / sings in response. I wish we could all be so lucky!!
You are a musician?

Explain what you mean, or rather, what the GIRM means, by “instruments can only support the singing.”

Does this mean “play softly at all times?” Does this mean “no improvisation?” Does this mean, “Play only in lower keys?” Does this mean “only play the melody with no accompaniment?” Does this mean no rhythmic accompaniment, or just the opposite–that beating out the time is vital to “supporting the singing?” Does this mean that the organ should use different registrations to provide appropriate color to the different verses of the hymns? Or does it mean just the opposite–that the organ should never attempt to interpret the hymns, but only play a background (soft?) accompaniment while the singers (congregation) interpret the hymn?

What DOES it mean? When you play an instrument to “support the singing,” what exactly do you do? (If you don’t mind, specify what instrument you play.)

I’m especially interested in what this means for guitarists. Guitars are used around the world to accompany singing. What does the GIRM mean when it comes to guitars “supporting the singing?” Is it best for them to strum chords, or to pick melodies and counterpoint? Or is it better to have at least two guitars–one to strum the chords and one to pick the melody?

Thanks. I think it’s important that the phrase “instruments can only support the singing” be made crystal clear to musicians.
 
You are a musician?

Explain what you mean, or rather, what the GIRM means, by “instruments can only support the singing.”
What it means is that the instrument can be used to help the singers stay on note. Although chant, for example, is meant to be sung a cappella, that sometimes is a bit tough for newbies so the organ is played softly to keep the musicians on note. The tendency for newbies, in chant, is to let their voices drift downwards in pitch. The organist gives the musicians the pitch.

I personally don’t like it. Our schola improved 110% when our organist quit and we decided not to replace him. The organ made us lazy and often drowned us out somewhat.

Therefore the organist is not playing a specific piece, merely following the notes of the hymn or chant being sung.
 
What it means is that the instrument can be used to help the singers stay on note. Although chant, for example, is meant to be sung a cappella, that sometimes is a bit tough for newbies so the organ is played softly to keep the musicians on note. The tendency for newbies, in chant, is to let their voices drift downwards in pitch. The organist gives the musicians the pitch.

I personally don’t like it. Our schola improved 110% when our organist quit and we decided not to replace him. The organ made us lazy and often drowned us out somewhat.

Therefore the organist is not playing a specific piece, merely following the notes of the hymn or chant being sung.
Yes, the organ can be helpful with chant, but I’ve seen the organ make it very dreadful. Some organists play every… single… note and it keeps the chant from flowing and makes it sound as if each note was this plodding through mud. Then I’ve heard other organists do it so well where they might play a very simple chord or even just a single note at the beginning of the chant and then plays other chords or single notes at certain parts of the chant to be sure everyone is still in the same key. It helps the congregation AND the priest be able to get in a flow when chanting rather than plod along.
 
You are a musician?

Explain what you mean, or rather, what the GIRM means, by “instruments can only support the singing.”

What DOES it mean? When you play an instrument to “support the singing,” what exactly do you do? (If you don’t mind, specify what instrument you play.)

I’m especially interested in what this means for guitarists. Guitars are used around the world to accompany singing. What does the GIRM mean when it comes to guitars “supporting the singing?” Is it best for them to strum chords, or to pick melodies and counterpoint? Or is it better to have at least two guitars–one to strum the chords and one to pick the melody?

Thanks. I think it’s important that the phrase “instruments can only support the singing” be made crystal clear to musicians.
Yes, it’s pretty unclear, isn’t it? I play violin at my parish many weeks of the year (except during Lent and Advent). Luckily, I am not the one who has to try to interpret that instruction from GIRM. From what I read at CMAA forum, most of those music directors interpret it to mean, subdued organ only (no guitar, no other instruments), no prelude music, no postlude music. Focus on vocal music as much as possible. The parish might just respond with the joy that “Beautiful” did! 🙂
 
Wow!!! I thought this thread was dead. That is so wonderful to hear, Beautiful!!! Sometimes that can work really well, like in your experience. Sometimes it doesn’t. When I’ve been in congregations where there were no instruments or singers and the priest couldn’t sing and no one was really going at it, I’d just sing full-voiced from the pews and then others will join. Then, other times, I’d end up being a “soloist” as a congregant in the pew singing with the priest because no one will sing. I’ve found that it really depends on the congregation and the priest. God bless you. I’m happy you had that experience.
My memory recall of music during Mass is characterized by voices of various individuals, instrumentation of individuals and even distortions of certain songs by entire choirs.

Parishioner memory recall should not be of individual voices or instrumentalist. Memory recall should be free of this.

Equal participation of parishioners with no one voice or instrument exceeding the whole is ideal.

This is possible in all parishes if the priest takes the lead and slowly introduces music in a way that all can easily and simply participate in. Music in some parishes might not ever go beyond the simplest forms. That is better than partial participation or no participation.

Even the most tone deaf priest can still have a fair shake at leading his people. That is something parishioners must accept about him and correct/deal with as they go along. Autocorrect 😃 or assign one individual/instrumentalist to start song in the most simple way and not a dominating way.

Music should be in unity rather than domination of individuals.
 
I’m not so sure that this is a major problem in Catholic Litrugies now of days. At-least not compared to what happened in the late middle ages and the 18th 19th and 20th centuries. Currently I feel like the music of the Mass rather than being performance based (while there are some of those Churches out there) mostly air to the side of all inclusiveness. Churches use hymns because everyone can sing them and many sound nice. People are hesitant to bring chant into the Mass because they fear only a few can do that and they couldn’t do it that well.

A wrong understanding of active participation is feeding this all inclusive idea of singing at the Mass. People think if I’m not singing I’m not actively participating. While it is possible that someone who doesn’t sing anything during the Mass is more actively participating in the Mass than someone who is singing as loud as he can.
In my experience, Catholic congregations RARELY sing when contemporary music is used. I see the congregation standing still staring at the front as the choir sings. Not saying this is universally true, but it has been my experience in a number of different parishes. On the other hand, I’ve been to parishes with much more traditional music where the congregation does join in.
In regards to chant, I don’t know why we as Latin Catholics think it is so hard to implement and learn. Every single Eastern Catholic / Orthodox parish, down to the smallest mission of a handful of people, chants the ENTIRE liturgy every single Sunday and their congregations have no problem joining in…
 
In my experience, Catholic congregations RARELY sing when contemporary music is used. I see the congregation standing still staring at the front as the choir sings. Not saying this is universally true, but it has been my experience in a number of different parishes. On the other hand, I’ve been to parishes with much more traditional music where the congregation does join in.
In regards to chant, I don’t know why we as Latin Catholics think it is so hard to implement and learn. Every single Eastern Catholic / Orthodox parish, down to the smallest mission of a handful of people, chants the ENTIRE liturgy every single Sunday and their congregations have no problem joining in…
I hate to say but I think these reasons are true.

Why you ask?

Laziness
It is easy just to pay certain people to perform on demand. Any kind of music is guaranteed even though it has unsatisfactory participation from those in the pew.

Pride and Greed

Once an individual or individuals are hired a certain degree of ownership and dominance sets in.

The ‘club’ mentality

Some people join church choirs to ‘belong’ or ‘shine’ in a spotlight. Once the ‘club’ is formed, a sense of inclusion/ ownership results and a laziness/exclusion presides among those in the pew outside the choir.

People don’t go to Mass to be entertained by individual musicians or impressive choirs. People want to sing prayer but can’t really get with the flow of today’s Catholic music ministry.
Yes, I take a look around and most parishioners are straight faced and closed mouth when it comes to music.
 
Yes, it’s pretty unclear, isn’t it? I play violin at my parish many weeks of the year (except during Lent and Advent). Luckily, I am not the one who has to try to interpret that instruction from GIRM. From what I read at CMAA forum, most of those music directors interpret it to mean, subdued organ only (no guitar, no other instruments), no prelude music, no postlude music. Focus on vocal music as much as possible. The parish might just respond with the joy that “Beautiful” did! 🙂
Do you know anything about the history and tradition of organ use in the Catholic Mass throughout the centuries?

I am learning all this from my organ teacher, who is a FAGO with American Guild of Organists.

What you are saying about use of organ in the Catholic Mass goes against all history and tradition.
 
Do you know anything about the history and tradition of organ use in the Catholic Mass throughout the centuries?

I am learning all this from my organ teacher, who is a FAGO with American Guild of Organists.

What you are saying about use of organ in the Catholic Mass goes against all history and tradition.
I understand the long history of organ music at Catholic Mass. Some organs are quite impressive in sound and appearance. Organ music goes quite beautifully at particular times. Generally, simplified music for average singers is more spiritually beneficial for all. I like to sing the Holy, Holy, Holy and hear myself and others around me instead of a big booming organ and/or choir.

If you are an organist at church, have you ever had the delight of hearing a young child near you try to sing the Our Father with everyone? Probably not. Probably not many have that pleasure these days because of the domination of instrument, choir or individuals.

Given a chance, children will sing/pray too! Their voice is most precious of all! Little ones generally are not singing to the beat of a church choir and organ. Take a look. 😦 These are the ones we need to encourage to join us in song. We should sing at a level even a child feels welcome. Music should be encompassing at all levels.
 
Do you know anything about the history and tradition of organ use in the Catholic Mass throughout the centuries?

I am learning all this from my organ teacher, who is a FAGO with American Guild of Organists.

What you are saying about use of organ in the Catholic Mass goes against all history and tradition.
Really - - it goes against all history and tradition? To use the organ sparingly** during Lent**? That may be - - what I read in general is along these lines: (from CanticaNova Publications)

The Roman Missal presents in very clear format the effects that the seasons have on the liturgy, e.g. no “Alleluia” during Lent, subdued organ music during Advent. About organ music during Lent the document says,

During Lent, it is not permitted to decorate the altar with flowers, and the use of musical instruments is allowed only so as to support the singing. Nevertheless, Laetare Sunday (the Fourth Sunday of Lent), Solemnities and Feasts are exceptions to this rule. [Lent, rubric #4]

What this means is, there should be no solo organ music (prelude, offertory, recessional, postlude, etc.) during Lent. Musical instruments (including the organ) may be used only for accompaniment … for hymns, responses, choral or vocal accompaniment. As noted, this rule does not come into play on Laetare Sunday or on Solemnities (like Saint Joseph, Annunciation) or Feasts (like the Chair of Saint Peter).

canticanova.com/articles/feedback/arte81.htm

Your organ teacher may be very knowledgeable about the historical use of organ during Lent. Probably way more so than I am! 🙂 All I know is how music directors are trying to interpret GIRM today.
 
I realize I was remarkably unclear in my earlier post. Organ to be used sparingly during Lent, no throughout the liturgical year. Lent only.
Sorry!
 
Really - - it goes against all history and tradition? To use the organ sparingly** during Lent**? That may be - - what I read in general is along these lines: (from CanticaNova Publications)
Yes, of course there are different guidelines for Lent when it comes to the Mass music, and I know what they are and follow them.

But this thread isn’t about Lent, unless I’m missing something in the title.

LATER–sorry, didn’t see your post.
 
I understand the long history of organ music at Catholic Mass. Some organs are quite impressive in sound and appearance. Organ music goes quite beautifully at particular times. Generally, simplified music for average singers is more spiritually beneficial for all. I like to sing the Holy, Holy, Holy and hear myself and others around me instead of a big booming organ and/or choir.

If you are an organist at church, have you ever had the delight of hearing a young child near you try to sing the Our Father with everyone? Probably not. Probably not many have that pleasure these days because of the domination of instrument, choir or individuals.

Given a chance, children will sing/pray too! Their voice is most precious of all! Little ones generally are not singing to the beat of a church choir and organ. Take a look. 😦 These are the ones we need to encourage to join us in song. We should sing at a level even a child feels welcome. Music should be encompassing at all levels.
In our city, it’s not likely. A deseg lawsuit in the 1980s all but destroyed the arts in the public schools. The children in public schools in our city have a half-hour of chorus per week.

The private schools, including the the Catholic schools, aren’t much better. There is one full-time music teacher for all of the Catholic parish schools in our city. The other schools have a part-time music teacher.

What this means is that for the last 20 years, children in our city have not been taught to sing. So they don’t.

I’ve accompanied children’s choirs, both secular and church, under excellent directors for over 50 years. What I have seen is that children sing best when the accompaniment is done correctly, and when they are taught to sing correctly by a good director.

Why give them junk? Why allow them to sing badly, and excuse it by saying, “How sweet the little children sound as they meander around the melody and the time signature.” Nonsense.

If a child can read print, they can learn to read music. I’ve seen children as young as 4 and 5 who can read music. So a school-aged child should be reading the notes in the hymnal and singing along with the correct melody in the correct time signature, and following the rhythm as much as possible (sometimes rhythms can be tricky to sight-read.)

When an accompanist holds back and plays softly, the little children hold back and sing softly because they aren’t being “supported” by the accompaniment. (Grown-ups do the same thing, or they don’t sing at all.)

I frankly would like to hear, in the Catholic churches, little children with eyes wide with excitement upon hearing a “full organ” on the hymns that call for a full organ (e.g., Joyful Joyful, We Adore Thee), and singing with all their hearts and with full voices! I would like to hear little children sighing with delight when the registration in each hymns verse changes in order to “interpret” the verse and helps the congregation to more fully understand and appreciate the hymns.

That’s how I play the organ. If it’s wrong, well…no one has stopped me yet.
 
I prefer the tracitional catholic worship
So you like it when the organ accompanies the entire Mass? When the priest and the congregation wait for the organ to finish the multi-page introduction to each prayer and response?

I’ve been practicing one of those Masses (by Couperin). The organ traditionally plays several pages immediately after Holy Communion so that the people can meditate upon the Lord Jesus. (I’m pretty bad at playing it so far.)

I think that sounds like a rather nice way to do Mass. So you like this, too?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top