Would liberals agree to ban access to abortions if conservatives agree to ban guns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter livingwordunity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

livingwordunity

Guest
Just a thought, but I think the answer liberals will give is “hell no!”. I think conservatives should offer this challenge publicly to the liberals to see what’s more important to liberals - gun control or their abortions.
 
Of course that would be their answer! Liberalism is always at its best whenever accompanied by soaring heights of hypocrisy. You know the type. Save the whales but kill the babies.
 
Abortion is a sacrament to the liberal left, so the answer is “No.” They want both - unlimited ability to kill their own children, and no power for us to stop the governmental tyranny and protect our families.
 
Abortion is a sacrament to the liberal left, so the answer is “No.” They want both - unlimited ability to kill their own children, and no power for us to stop the governmental tyranny and protect our families.
What’s hypocritical is they want to ban guns because they say it’s to prevent children from getting massacred in a classroom, but they have no problem with the mass killing of innocents as long as it’s while the child is in the womb and as long as it’s what the mother wanted. What makes abortion worse than what happened at Sandy Hook elementary is that mothers give their consent to the cold killing of their baby while the government tells them that it’s their right. It would be like if the mothers at an elementary school knew that a spree killer was coming to the school and they got in line to offer up their children to him.
 
What’s hypocritical is they want to ban guns because they say it’s to prevent children from getting massacred in a classroom, but they have no problem with the mass killing of innocents as long as it’s while the child is in the womb and as long as it’s what the mother wanted. What makes abortion worse than what happened at Sandy Hook elementary is that mothers give their consent to the cold killing of their baby while the government tells them that it’s their right. It would be like if the mothers at an elementary school knew that a spree killer was coming to the school and they got in line to offer up their children to him.
Outstanding Post!! 👍
 
What’s hypocritical is they want to ban guns because they say it’s to prevent children from getting massacred in a classroom, but they have no problem with the mass killing of innocents as long as it’s while the child is in the womb and as long as it’s what the mother wanted. What makes abortion worse than what happened at Sandy Hook elementary is that mothers give their consent to the cold killing of their baby while the government tells them that it’s their right. It would be like if the mothers at an elementary school knew that a spree killer was coming to the school and they got in line to offer up their children to him.
4000 are killed every day by abortion and tragic shooting in Newtown shows a disrespect for life from Adam Lanza as abortion shows the unborn child

There is a hypocrisy that is shown by some people are towards children killed by abortion and the children killed by Adam Lanza
 
Just a thought, but I think the answer liberals will give is “hell no!”. I think conservatives should offer this challenge publicly to the liberals to see what’s more important to liberals - gun control or their abortions.
Both abortion and gun control are fatally flawed in their DNA. They seek physical solutions to spiritual problems. The only thing that needed controlling in Sandy Hook was a single, gravely troubled man. The State of Connecticut chose not to control him and paid a horrible price.

When I was young, WWII surplus rifles were stacked in a barrel in front of the counter at a surplus store, while the dangerous mentally challenged were confined within controlled environments. Today, we seek to confine the weapons while we allow the mentally challenged to roam free. Where is the justice in that?

31 years in law enforcement taught me very clearly that incarceration saves lives. Had a single troubled man been in a controlled environment, not only would he still be alive, but also 27 others.
 
Who would have the authority to make such a deal? And do you think the members of the NRA would give up their guns if abortion were made illegal in exchange?
 
Just a thought, but I think the answer liberals will give is “hell no!”. I think conservatives should offer this challenge publicly to the liberals to see what’s more important to liberals - gun control or their abortions.
They’d say, “Give us your guns first, then we’ll give up abortions.” Once the guns are given up, they’ll make sure there is more abortion access than ever.
 
Just a thought, but I think the answer liberals will give is “hell no!”. I think conservatives should offer this challenge publicly to the liberals to see what’s more important to liberals - gun control or their abortions.
As a liberal, I would say yes, with the exceptions of the mother’s life, rape, incest, and certain extreme congenital diseases. The family, with the guidance of their pastor and doctor, should make the decision in these cases. This would be in accord with Jewish Law for the most part. But I wouldn’t want to ban all guns owned by all civilians, such as those used by hunters, collectors, or those who wish to protect their home and business; only military-assault weapons. And also to make sure the gun loopholes at gun shows are closed and that the current laws for access are strictly enforced. A national database including criminals and those mentally ill people who are dangerous would also be desirable, if it is not already in existence.
 
“Liberals” don’t want gun control for any evil reason. They want it because they think it is the most straightforward way of limiting deaths due to firearms.

Besides, gun control is not as important an issue for liberals as abortion is for conservatives. So even if it were possible to make a deal like the one suggested, a lot more would have to be offered in exchange. People who really think abortion is murder should be ready to compromise on everything else.

I’m just tossing ideas around, by the way. I don’t consider myself either liberal or conservative.
 
Besides, gun control is not as important an issue for liberals as abortion is for conservatives.
That is simply not true. Did you see any of the 2012 presidential election campaign? All the Democrats talked about was a so-called “war on women” and how they were afraid that Romney would be a threat to Roe VS Wade. But Republicans wanted to talk about the economy.
 
How’s this: We ban abortions, but not guns. Good luck trying to repeal the Second amendment. There’s nothing in the Constitution about abortion, but there IS language about guns. It ain’t easy amending the Constitution. I don’t like the idea of altering the BILL OF RIGHTS at all. If we change the Second, and how long before someone wants/tries to change the First? Gun ownership in and of itself is NOT immoral.

The right of private ownership is needed for three VERY good reasons…:
  1. To defend our homes and persons who have guns.
  2. In the event of an invasion from a foreign power.
  3. To keep our own govenment honest.
If I may expand on # 1… When every second counts, the police are only minutes away…
 
How’s this: We ban abortions, but not guns. Good luck trying to repeal the Second amendment. There’s nothing in the Constitution about abortion, but there IS language about guns. It ain’t easy amending the Constitution. I don’t like the idea of altering the BILL OF RIGHTS at all. If we change the Second, and how long before someone wants/tries to change the First? Gun ownership in and of itself is NOT immoral.

The right of private ownership is needed for three VERY good reasons…:
  1. To defend our homes and persons who have guns.
  2. In the event of an invasion from a foreign power.
  3. To keep our own govenment honest.
If I may expand on # 1… When every second counts, the police are only minutes away…
👍 Great post!
 
I’m a liberal and I would take to the streets if either was banned.

Most liberals don’t want to ban guns, and many liberals even own them. What we would like is greater accountability and more oversight.
 
Most liberals don’t want to ban guns, and many liberals even own them. What we would like is greater accountability and more oversight.
Then why are some liberals calling for the murder of NRA members?
 
I’m a liberal and I would take to the streets if either was banned.

Most liberals don’t want to ban guns, and many liberals even own them. What we would like is greater accountability and more oversight.
How tight do controls have to be? The laws get stricter every year, yet the murders keep happening. The problem isn’t guns, it’s bad parenting and a total lack of respect for our fellow man. We humans have devolved to a point where there’s no respect, manners, or sense of personal responsibility.

How about we start acting like humans again? Things like this never happened in the wild west where there was NO ‘gun control’.
 
That is simply not true. Did you see any of the 2012 presidential election campaign? All the Democrats talked about was a so-called “war on women” and how they were afraid that Romney would be a threat to Roe VS Wade. But Republicans wanted to talk about the economy.
I wrote that gun control is not as important for liberals as abortion for conservatives (or for liberals). Not that abortion isn’t an important issue for liberals.
 
How tight do controls have to be? The laws get stricter every year, yet the murders keep happening. The problem isn’t guns, it’s bad parenting and a total lack of respect for our fellow man. We humans have devolved to a point where there’s no respect, manners, or sense of personal responsibility.

How about we start acting like humans again? Things like this never happened in the wild west where there was NO ‘gun control’.
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top