You have added more information that shows they are not equal, violating your original premise.
“Oi,you just don’t get it do you?:dts:” is honestly what I’m thinking in my mind. I mean no disrespect or insult with this truth.Okay,look I’ve one of the reasons for the way I’ve worded my answers is b/c I would not like to give real life examples b/c there’s some pretty strong point in cases and I personally feel like I’m pointing fingers at people.Yet,for the sake of this debate I’ll do it so it will help resolve this and you’ll finally see what I’m getting at.
Let me give you an example:Japan.Historically although it’s been always pride fully independent society even though it clearly has been influenced by other cultures notably the Chinese while never been subjected having to the experience of being colonized. Invaded and/or raided?. Yes. But almost having their culture and/or people totally wiped out? Oh heck no, not with that codified way of life that also made such a loyal military force that it still leaves a mark decades after it was perverted for selfish government reasons in WWII.***What good did those ***xenophobic tendencies and fanatical nationalism that sprouted out of thinking that they were more “Westernized” and therefore superior to other Asian cultures *bring to the world *
?.It made them cocky enough to try to invade East Asia bring which included over three decades of controlling Korea, using the woman there as "comfort woman”, added a particularly hard to beat theatre of war which ended after using one of the deadliest weapons ever invented twice. Even after their defeat it gave rise to the reputations of certain people who are controversially seen as war heroes to them but war criminals to the countries they ventured to. Or for a more recent example
Sudan.One of the reason it split up was b/c the Islamified northern part culturally considered themselves more similar to Arabs in contrast to the southern region which did not and also had a higher population who practised Christianity. After so much relentless persecution by the northern region they finally got fed up enough to split up and become a different county.
I can also make up a hypothetical scenario using high school setting as an analogy. Let’s say that in a calculus class of 30 that I’m in 1/5 of them are super talented and athletic loudmouth braggarts who are more accomplished and proficient then me the subject (I have been
in pretty similar situations at times by the way but not like this one).I will voluntary choose to treat them with the same amount of respect like any other person deserves even though they make harasses me, goad me, prank me and call me names. Now let’s say at some point my mark gets significantly higher then there’s. They find out about this by taking away my progress report. And what word might might that unexpectedly high mark of mine that left them with their jaws wide open? Unprecedence.That’s right despite the way they were acting with that personality of theirs it is
not like they’re going to stay that way forever.Life is change.People can obviously change. To think that they cant is downright ignorance to think that they cant.But after that unexpected change what could happen to the old persecutor?. They could be scared and end up the persecuted one this time. But after reaching such a level the ex-persecuted
shouldn’t feel like doing that. He’s able to meet his own needs now and can keep on happily keeping to himself if they weren’t already.
His conspicuous abilities and accomplishments speak for themselves.He can continue to peacefully view and treat others.
There is no obligation to think otherwise.
There haven’t ever been too many societies outside certain Asian one to be taken seriously by aspiring colonizers like various European groups (ex.Spain) and live to tell about it without having some or most of without most of their own people killed. Similarly there are not many people who consistently treat all people nice (including those who marginalized them at some point) regardless of the different ethnicity, talents, status, abilities, upbringing and they have. All those ethnic groups who ended up marginalized don’t you think they would have
liked to have had a successfully enriching cultural dialogue with the European newcomers that would mean they all just end of getting along and co-existing without one of them sneering with their noses up at the mere thought of the others b/c one group chose to be “mind blind” with preconceptions and biases to further impair them?. How did all that end up? I mean sure the Natives might have had some arguable customs like human sacrifices along with likely practising questionable magic and rituals and in the end ended up changing for the better but the European colonizers were far from perfect themselves when they initially came with unjust socioeconomic policies like feudalism,
their own style of slavery and draining up resources.
Does this help you understand what I’m getting at -_-?.I’m sorry if this posting has sounded ireful by the way.I’m not angry at you.This stuff I just said get me* particulary *impassioned.
?
,but wouldn’t such a community be just as well so long as they get down to the real work of meeting neccesities? (through agriculture and animal husbandry instead of some sort of raiding) while defending themselves when neccesary from enemies BUT not with the thought in mind that there superior then some “barbarians” who are trying to kill them but with the simple thought that there some ppl are in violation of forcefully using what they rightfully earned and need.