A
Achilles6129
Guest
I see. And what is love? How would God define it?Worship and serve only LOVE and you cannot go wrong. The problem is that many people seek, and worship, immediate gratification and falsely worship it.
LOVE!![]()
I see. And what is love? How would God define it?Worship and serve only LOVE and you cannot go wrong. The problem is that many people seek, and worship, immediate gratification and falsely worship it.
LOVE!![]()
On the one hand, God is LOVE and He is well beyond comprehension and definition, but Christ taught us to LOVE our neighbor as ourselves which to me implies caring and treating everyone as we would ourselves.I see. And what is love? How would God define it?
The “by your standards” critera is sketchy and subjective. But in the spirit of the question I’d say: It wouldn’t matter, you’d be pretty much doomed anyway.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
This is the usual argument for atheism. Better to believe in no God than the evil Christian God.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
I see. Do you think that the two witnesses display your definition of loving your neighbor as yourself? What about John the Baptist?:On the one hand, God is LOVE and He is well beyond comprehension and definition, but Christ taught us to LOVE our neighbor as ourselves which to me implies caring and treating everyone as we would ourselves.
LOVE!![]()
Why would God being evil by someone’s standards be an absurdity? God could be good in reality but evil by someone else’s standards - doesn’t Revelation 11 (the passage that I quoted earlier) prove that that’s an actual reality?I would be 100% willing to serve - believe in - an evil God (Designer, Creator, Maintainer of the Universe, Perfect Unity, Perfect Love, Perfect Mind), no less than I would be willing to believe in a square circle, and serve an unservable master. In other words, the question is what philosophers call an “absurdity.” The question posits as potential something that is not potential, that is impossible, and therefore could never be actual.
It’s not much difference from asking,
“Would you serve a perfect God if he were imperfect?”
Why wouldn’t it matter? You could start out serving a God whom you thought was evil but then end up discovering that your own standards of good/evil were completely wrong and that God was actually good.The “by your standards” critera is sketchy and subjective. But in the spirit of the question I’d say: It wouldn’t matter, you’d be pretty much doomed anyway.
What would be the point of serving an evil God? If he is evil, he will do evil to you whether you serve him or not. If you are evil, he will do evil to you whether you serve him or not. If you are good, he will do evil to you whether you serve him or not. It’s a no-win situation.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
If God were evil (forget the bit about “by our standards” since we all have different standards - He’s either evil or He’s not), then everything else would be evil. Existence would be complete and utter chaos.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
What two witnesses are you speaking about? Where does John the Baptist fit into this? Surely he loved God and his neighbor.I see. Do you think that the two witnesses display your definition of loving your neighbor as yourself? What about John the Baptist?:
“7 But when he saw many Pharisees and Sadducees coming for baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruit worthy of repentance. 9 Do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our ancestor’; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. 10 Even now the ax is lying at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” Mt. 3:7-10 (NRSV)
What a strangely narrow definition of a god.It does not work. God is being and evil is non-being. God cannot be evil. Though he can seem that way sometimes, it is because we have an imperfect understanding of him and will have to accept that.
An “evil God” is meaningless.
Admirable.Judaism has a tradition of questioning and even accusing G-d when it is thought that He does not live up to His own moral standards.
…uh oh.I think the number of different answers to this question show that it is a very good one, or at least a very thought provoking one.
Hallowed are the Ori!![]()
Baby don’t hurt me?I see. And what is love? How would God define it?
The ones in Revelation 11.What two witnesses are you speaking about?
My question was if what John the Baptist said to his neighbor fits your definitions of love.Where does John the Baptist fit into this? Surely he loved God and his neighbor.
And what if God actually turned out to be good and your standards of good/evil turned out to be completely warped and distorted?I would do everything in my power to subvert him if not actively resist him.