Would you vote for Hillary Clinton if she ran for president???

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteDove
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
continued…

You would think that the Democratic party would do this without being asked. They cannot, because the billion dollar abortion industry is one of their primary donors, and the latter and CFFC are peas of the same pod.

Even though the Democratic party is in bed with Planned Parenthood, the leading killers of unborn children in the world and NARAL, the leading boosters of these killings, shouldn’t they have some sense of common decency? Silly question – they kill human beings.

These things are so mind boggling that I just cannot find the right words. Catholics have just got to start using their God-given brains. If they really don’t know how to use their brains, they should ask God if they should vote for someone who would sign the death warrants to kill His precious children, or someone who would save their lives.

This is a “no brainer,” so Catholics don’t really have to think.

Is it possible that Catholics do not fear going to hell, because of their condoning and propagating the killing of unborn children? When you say you are pro-choice (to kill unborn children), you are condoning the most serious of sins – the killing of a human being. When you accept evil – you propagate evil.

Is it possible that Catholics are masochists and enjoy being called names by the Democratic party, and enjoy their faith being trashed and unborn children being killed?

This must be it. How else does one explain their voting for the very same people who mock them and their faith and propagate the killing of God’s children?

A normal person of faith, without masochistic tendencies would NEVER, EVER vote for a Democrat.

I am a Catholic, but I am ashamed of 50% of my fellow Catholics and most of the priests and Bishops for their pitiful attempt to end the American holocaust.

You would think that every week from now until the November elections, the oratory emanating from the pulpits every Sunday would have as the number one subject - “Vote for pro-life candidates, so the killing of unborn children ends and if you don’t know who they are - in the back of the church, you will find pamphlets, which will list the pro-life candidates.”

Naturally 90% on that list will be Republicans. Could this be the reason Catholic bishops do not do this?

If the bishops had more “guts” they would tell the pastors to identify pro-life candidates by name, starting NOW. But, they will not, because they are afraid of losing their tax status.

This will NEVER happen, because black churches actually name names, and you know they will never lose their tax status. The Reverends Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson even mention specific names on national television shows, as do most black ministers. This is why the Democrats have the black vote in their hip pocket.

Clinton and Gore actually went to black churches to get their vote and their money.

This is a MORAL ISSUE - not political - and it is the duty of bishops to educate their flocks and forget about money and practice what they preach: “What does it profit a man, if he gains the whole world, but suffers the loss of his soul,” It is obvious, bishops have forgotten this - NO - ignored is more accurate.

Bishops should also remember, the American Holocaust is not about abortions. It is about the KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN.

Dr. Frank Joseph
Anaheim, California
 
40.png
savone:
Yes, I would vote for her. I would vote for her again, and again, and again, and again, and . . . 😃
And I’m sure you think abortion is OK. Abort the child again, and again, and again, and again, and …
 
Hillary is a political opportunist who would sellout for a chance at the Presidency. She will sell to the highest left-wing pro-abortion, anti-Catholic, pro-New World Order-and-the-sooner-the-better bidders, if she’s not already done so, and then would spend her Presidency doing her masters’ bidding.

Besides, as a woman, I know that any woman who changed her hairstyles as often as she did when she was First Spouse, is unstable. :eek:
 
I’d vote for Hillary over any Republican any day for any office, but would vote for a pro-life Democrat over Hillary any day for any office.

That’s my vote. Others can condemn her or praise her and then vote for her or for her opponents as they choose. That’s what’s great about the ballot.
 
40.png
Timidity:
I voted the “lesser of two evils” answer, but in reality it would have to be the lesser of many evils, as I have no problem voting for third party canidates.

Of course, the answer is predicated on the assumption that she won’t have a sudden spiritual awakening and change her stance on many issues.
MOST PEOPLE DID VOTE FOR THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS,WHY DO YOU THINK BUSH IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE ARE STILL PAYING OFF HIS OIL BUDDYS
 
I certainly would. She’s extremely intelligent, has proven herself in the Political arena, fought some good fights in New York, PLUS she has the advantage of having an ex-President as a husband for (name removed by moderator)ut.

So let’s keep praying for her as others have suggested that her heart will be turned around.

Concoleeza Rice is another very intelligent woman, but her credibility has been slashed by continuing to work for this present lying Administration. She should have left like Colin Powell did.
 
Hell would freeze over my dead body before I’d cast my vote for that woman! I thought that this way of saying “no” was a little too mildly worded, but I opted for this one, anyway.
 
No-I never vote for pro abortion canidsates regardless of their political affiliation
 
I am from NY and I assure you that if she ran the country like she “represents” this state we are in deep, deep trouble.
 
Other amusing questions in this category include…

Would I take a sharp needle and poke it in my eye?

Would I download Mariah Carey’s latest CD to my ipod?

Would I go to a British dentist?

Would I purchase a house lot next to a wastewater treatment facility?

😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top