I
InJesusItrust
Guest
In a story I am writing my characters sometimes use bad words but not to excess. Is it a venial sin to write the story?
If the language is necessary to accurately convey time period, personality, culture, and situation, and you genuinely are not writing the language for the purpose of the swearing, it is not necessarily sinful.In a story I am writing my characters sometimes use bad words but not to excess. Is it a venial sin to write the story?
Words have different effects when spoken and written. Be sure the words work when written. They might work when spoken, but when we speak we have gestures, expressions, posture, tone, volume, etc. Effective use of these words often demands spoken rhythm that can’t be duplicated on the page. These are all lacking in the written word.In a story I am writing my characters sometimes use bad words but not to excess. Is it a venial sin to write the story?
That’s tough to do. It’s hard enough to make it work when the vocabulary actually fits the character. It’s even harder to do it when trying to show something like immaturity.Well, I am trying to convey that my characters are immature. So the dialogue they have is one way I have to characterize them.
Later, at my house, while we were sitting on the sofa and playing Soulcalibur II on my Xbox, John said, “So what was up with you today?”
My fighter mauled his fighter, and the screen lit up: KO. “What do you mean?”
“I mean you played pretty bad today. You kept fumbling the ball.”
“Not in my game today, I guess.”
I kicked his *** some more in Soulcalibur II. “So that new girl…” he said. “What’s her name again?”
“Erika.”
“Yes, Erika. Do you think that she is pretty?”
My face burned, but I continued playing the game. “She’s all right. Why? You like her?”
“No! Of course not!” he said. “I mean—yeah she is pretty… but I don’t like her like that, you know?”
I grinned. “Liar!”
“Ah, shaddup! You know nothing.”
This is the passage in question. I did not really use an excess of profanities, but what I did use expresses a certain immature personality.After I beat his *** some more, we decided to watch TV and eat some nachos. Then he decided that he had to go back home, so I opened the gate and he walked outside it and down the hilly road
It doesn’t convey immaturity. It’s normal usage.This is the passage in question. I did not really use an excess of profanities, but what I did use expresses a certain immature personality.
Well, my character is slightly immature, but he’s not cruel.It doesn’t convey immaturity. It’s normal usage.
Note you are using the exact same phrase twice in first person narration. “his *** some more.”
Show immaturity by behavior or attitudes.
“I could have let him win a few games, but why bother? Real victory is in beating someone when they are already down. You know? Like kicking sand in their face. Let him get ahead, and maybe think he’s going to win, then slam his ***.”
Dialogue is a funny thing. If we write exactly as we speak, it’s a mess. Nobody can read it and understand it. But if we make dialogue conform to all the rules of grammar, it’s stilted and unrealistic. So written dialogue has to balance between the two. It has to conform to grammatical rules to the extent that it can be conveyed in writing, and it also has to break them to be realistic. Making that work with the selection of words we are referring to is really hard to do. That’s why so few do it.If I could write something that anyone would read, I would probably base it on my experience as a correctional officer. The language I would have to use to make it realistic would make a sailor blush. That’s just the nature of the beast.
Sure. He’s your guy. That was just an example of using attitude to convey something else.Well, my character is slightly immature, but he’s not cruel.
Well as someone once told me, my grammar is in the kitchen baking cookies.Dialogue is a funny thing. If we write exactly as we speak, it’s a mess. Nobody can read it and understand it. But if we make dialogue conform to all the rules of grammar, it’s stilted and unrealistic. So written dialogue has to balance between the two. It has to conform to grammatical rules to the extent that it can be conveyed in writing, and it also has to break them to be realistic. Making that work with the selection of words we are referring to is really hard to do. That’s why so few do it.
You make a good point, but I couldn’t write a book about prison without cursing because that’s just the way prison is.The best literature contains no swear words.
Step back from the narrow question of how this scene should play, and first decide whether you want to be a popular writer or a good writer. Why do you even want to write about characters that seem trite and superficial? That is why you need the swear words (in this instance), your characters are shallow.
I’m surprised at the excuse making on here. Swearing is never necessary if you know how to write. You can convey the entire meaning and feeling without the words in question.
I think you have quite a way to go as a writer, and that is the real issue.