Wrong emphasis in same-sex marriage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qoeleth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reference to something in the teaching documents of the Church does not make it a ‘doctrine of Faith’, or even a ‘Church teaching’, so it is perfectly acceptable for a Catholic to believe that the ‘homosexual person’ is a myth. The role of the Catechism is not to teach anthropology, and if it makes reference to anthropological beliefs that are generally accepted, it does not make these thing “Church teachings”.

I agree that fixedly homosexual persons must be rare. Granted, in very rare cases a hormonal balance or something might cause it (like people of physiologically ambiguous gender), but in many cases, isn’t it a result of psychological or social factors.

In this sense, it could well be a myth…
Thank you for taking time to respond. I believe the Magisterium has no authority to present what is false
as truth in the name of the Lord’s Church; no matter how you care to characterize it. I believe that Christ
is Truth (Ref: John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way and the truth and the life.”). I believe to deny the
truth and replace it with a lie of Satan such as, the mythical “homosexual person” is real, is to deny Christ.
I believe Satan is a convincing liar.

I believe as members of the Church we have an obligation to the Lord to defend His Church from attacks
external and internal. I will rephrase my question.

Do you have something of substance that causes you to believe that the mythical “homosexual person”
is real? I have never had anyone present something that does.

God bless
 
Wasn’t commenting on the person’s opinion one way or the other. That topic just has lead to threads being re-directed to that discussion multiple times so I was trying to avoid that by offering the other poster a reference to the original argument that was made.

We don’t know the cause of same sex attraction yet you think you can assert that it must be rare for it to be static for some people? I guess the testimonies of celibate Christians who deal with this issue and haven’t had a change in their sexuality are misleading? Define rare: does that mean 1% of population, 1% of cases all gay/ssa people? Because 1% of the population would be 70 million people (so still small considering the world population but not inconsequential).

Minor soapbox distraction from the thread
It is extremely frustrating to read people constantly intellectualize this topic as if they are experts on it when there are celibate Christians, myself included, on this forum and our own testimonies and experiences are basically dismissed. So unless I’m some special unicorn, haven’t had a change in my sexuality and have never experienced opposite sex attraction, it doesn’t really matter if others think I’m a ‘myth.’ It doesn’t deny the reality I experience exclusive same sex attraction which is my call to a celibate life.

I haven’t turned my life over from God, I don’t have an abuse parental relationship, I wasn’t bad at sports, wasn’t sexually abused, wasn’t bullied about being gay as child, didn’t sexually experiment as child, or any of the other social tropes that are thrown out there as causes yet only same sex attracted and no inkling of opposite sex sexual attraction. Instead this cross is a manifestation of the fall that contributes to the cross I carry. Can God change me? Sure just as he could cure a person’s cancer, make a blind man see, a amputee grow their limb back. However, often that isn’t within His Will. Doesn’t mean I’m not able to still live an honorable life that is glorifying to him despite being a ‘mythical homosexual person.’ I guess I’m just the mythical unicorn then I guess: a gay/ssa celibate Catholic.
**Steps off soapbox **
At the risk of being overly simplistic, or optimistic, I actually think it’s a blessing for newcomers to the CA forum to read this thread – with its push for recriminalizing homosexual acts and its claims that “homosexual persons” are a myth, not to mention its proposal to legally ban homosexuals from coming out of the closet – because I know that for myself (and many others I don’t doubt) it took years and years to understand what things are like on this forum.
 
We don’t know the cause of same sex attraction
You may not wish to accept it but St. Paul explained the cause of SSA long ago quite clearly in Rom 1:24-28:
( Ref: usccb.org/bible/romans/1 )

24Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts* for the mutual degradation of their bodies.v 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.w 26Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity.x 28And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper.

God bless
 
You may not wish to accept it but St. Paul explained the cause of SSA long ago quite clearly in Rom 1:24-28:
( Ref: usccb.org/bible/romans/1 )

24Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts* for the mutual degradation of their bodies.v 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.w 26Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity.x 28And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper.

God bless
  1. Not burning with lust (struggle with lust at times but most of the time I can resist temptations
  2. not sexually active
  3. follow the truth of God, attend mass, sacraments as needed, and try and have a good spiritual life.
So not sure how this applies to me.

Now if you are trying to apply because I have same sex attractions I must be against God and have been given up to my passion that isn’t what the Church teaches. But whatever, feel free to condemn me.

So we can be broken in everybway due to the fall and lead to all kinds of temptations just not this one because why? What makes your theological point any stronger?
 
  1. Not burning with lust (struggle with lust at times but most of the time I can resist temptations
  2. not sexually active
  3. follow the truth of God, attend mass, sacraments as needed, and try and have a good spiritual life.
So not sure how this applies to me.

Now if you are trying to apply because I have same sex attractions I must be against God and have been given up to my passion that isn’t what the Church teaches. But whatever, feel free to condemn me.

So we can be broken in everybway due to the fall and lead to all kinds of temptations just not this one because why? What makes your theological point any stronger?
I don’t want to be a back-seat-driver of course (or back-seat-poster), but personally sometimes when I’m on an Internet discussion forum I just say “He/she is clearly trying to get me to respond, but I won’t.”

But, that being said, I think that your posts on this thread are very good. 🙂
 
  1. Not burning with lust (struggle with lust at times but most of the time I can resist temptations
  2. not sexually active
  3. follow the truth of God, attend mass, sacraments as needed, and try and have a good spiritual life.
So not sure how this applies to me.

Now if you are trying to apply because I have same sex attractions I must be against God and have been given up to my passion that isn’t what the Church teaches. But whatever, feel free to condemn me.

So we can be broken in everybway due to the fall and lead to all kinds of temptations just not this one because why? What makes your theological point any stronger?
Jjr9 cannot accept the reality that a person may experience SSA and yet be a good and faithful person enjoying the Lord’s favour. His original thread was referenced in an earlier post. He continues to repeat the same stuff, but I note most posters ignore him now.
 
That poster believes that the Catechism and the Church is in the wrong and in error by saying a person could experience exclusive same sex attraction from my understanding of their perspective.

They seem to believe that is not possible and want some kind of evidence to support it or something. Here is the their forum post (that gives their perspective) to read at your leisure if you want: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=966418.
Thanks for this.

I don’t mind having discussions and debates with people, but it can’t happen if one person isn’t willing to entertain perspectives other than their own. It’s a shame, really.

Lou
 
Thanks for this.

I don’t mind having discussions and debates with people, but it can’t happen if one person isn’t willing to entertain perspectives other than their own.
I think that’s common on Internet discussion forums.
 
  1. Not burning with lust (struggle with lust at times but most of the time I can resist temptations
  2. not sexually active
  3. follow the truth of God, attend mass, sacraments as needed, and try and have a good spiritual life.
I do not know you and leading a chaste life should be the goal for all of us married or unmarried.
I can assure you that SSA is not a part of your nature and does not come from the Lord.
So not sure how this applies to me.
I will not discuss you personally. What St. Paul says applies to us all, every time we act or dwell on a temptation
to sin we are rejecting the Lord who is only good.
Now if you are trying to apply because I have same sex attractions I must be against God and have been given up to my passion that isn’t what the Church teaches.
At times we are all against the Lord and it is up to us to repent and seek Grace from the Lord
to amend our lives but the Lord will not force us.
But whatever, feel free to condemn me.
I have not and do not condemn you I pray for you and hope you will pray for me.
So we can be broken in everybway due to the fall and lead to all kinds of temptations just not this one because why? What makes your theological point any stronger?
I am not clear on what you are saying here. I do not seek to diminish your real struggle at the
same time encouraging you to believe that you are something that doesn’t exist, the mythical
“homosexual person”, I believe to be a false compassion. You said:
We don’t know the cause of same sex attraction
I just pointed out what St Paul said on the subject in Rom 1:25:
( Ref: usccb.org/bible/romans/1 )

“They exchanged the truth of God for a lie”

People can claim that I am not open minded; what they have not, and cannot do, is to show a truly
right and just reason to believe anyone has an exclusive SSA as claimed by the Magisterium and the
Magisterium does not put a time frame on this, implied or otherwise, the claim is clear, unambiguous
and false.

God bless
 
I do not know you and leading a chaste life should be the goal for all of us married or unmarried.
I can assure you that SSA is not a part of your nature and does not come from the Lord.
Yes, chastity is good for all. Yet why in my case is that not good enough. Apparently not only do I have to be chaste but I have to make my same sex attractions completely go away. In effect, my temptations regardless of if I act on them or not makes me worse apparently. That is the perspective you are giving off.
I will not discuss you personally. What St. Paul says applies to us all, every time we act or dwell on a temptation
to sin we are rejecting the Lord who is only good.
Then you aren’t ever going to have real discussion then. This is not an academic debate, a theological discussional exercise. This is about people by simply trying to intellectualize and remove the personal element, you are removing their experiences, their perspectives, and in effect not approaching them where they are. Christ approached people where they were and then changed their hearts and minds. It wasn’t: I’m not goign to talk about you but just speak broadly so I can basically ignore all of your personal perspective, thoughts (which might be relevant since you have to deal with this all your life) because that doesn’t help my argument.
At times we are all against the Lord and it is up to us to repent and seek Grace from the Lord
to amend our lives but the Lord will not force us.
I am not against the Lord when I am tempted by same sex attractions. It is no different than when a straight married man is tempted to lust after a woman other than his wife. The difference is my attractions would be objectively disorders (as in the end result is not morally permissible in any situation) while is is subjectively disordered (as in if he wasn’t already married but rather was married to that women, the attraction would be fine). You seem to think that because I have these attractions I’m already at fault and already sinning. Temptations don’t equal sin. Yet apparently mine do (that is the premise you are pushing if you are not aware of it).
I have not and do not condemn you I pray for you and hope you will pray for me.
When you basically say the only reason a person could have same sex attractions is because of Romans you are saying that person must have turned their back to God. You are in effect saying that they don’t have a real relationship with God. You are in effect condemning them. So, if the attractions are still there, from your perspective, the person has still turned their back to God. Eventually the same sex attracted person is going to give up and actually give in because by and large, they are viewed as basically corrupt anyway.
I am not clear on what you are saying here. I do not seek to diminish your real struggle at the
Yes you are; I just don’t think you realize it because you haven’t really interacted with someone like me. You will not talk about my experiences personally which comes off as diminishing them as non-important and seem to make assumptions about my life. That does diminish my life. Then feel like you feel its okay to basically deny my experiences and call my either delusional or a liar (that is the only two options since I’m a mythical gay person with exclusive same sex attraction my entire life) basically because in your reality gay/ssa people can’t actually exist.

Just a friendly FYI: If you want one way to discourage people like me from trying to follow the Church and live in the light, this would be the way.

There are many people who spent years trying to be straight through therapy in order to be right with God because they believed and were told that having these temptations makes them less of a Christian and shows that their relationship with God is weak. Because if they had good faith, God would make them straight. Which reeks of Gospel of Prosperity heresy because it’s God’s Will and not ours and often He leaves crosses in our lives for reasons we don’t understand completely. Apparently Christians can have plenty of crosses in life to carry up and deny themselves daily… just not same sex attraction that means you have left God and you must replace that with opposite sex temptations because resisting apparently isn’t enough.
I just pointed out what St Paul said on the subject in Rom 1:25:
( Ref: usccb.org/bible/romans/1 )

“They exchanged the truth of God for a lie”

People can claim that I am not open minded; what they have not, and cannot do, is to show a truly
right and just reason to believe anyone has an exclusive SSA as claimed by the Magisterium and the
Magisterium does not put a time frame on this, implied or otherwise, the claim is clear, unambiguous
and false.

God bless
You are not open minded. You do not discuss this topic. You have said the same point time after time and when people challenged it, you didn’t provide a perspective just doubled down.

You are looking for a just reason for something to exist in a fallen world is a rather odd perspective to have. Pre-fall, there wouldn’t be same sex attraction, there wasn’t death, no illness, etc. You cannot apply a pre-fall perspective to our current world. What is just in a baby being born blind, what is just in a person struggling with anger issues, what is just in a married man having strong lustful tendencies. This is a broken world where things have everywhere have been affected by original sin. To act like every single other aspect of our world can be affected by original sin except same sex attraction. That only comes from one turning away from God is rather weak argument.
 
You are not open minded. You do not discuss this topic.
As I said I will not discuss you personally. If you choose to disregard St. Paul’s teaching that is up
to you. As far as discussing exclusive SSA that is pointless if exclusive SSA is a false premise as I
believe it is. Other than to dismiss the idea for the evil that it is.

Do you have something of substance that causes you to believe that the mythical “homosexual person”,
someone with exclusive SSA, is real? I have never had anyone present anything that does. You can believe
that I want to diminish your personal struggle if you wish, you would be wrong.

God bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top