R
“This ‘project’ is offensive and insensitive to the women who have suffered the heartbreak of miscarriage,” NARAL’s communication director Ted Miller said in a statement.
hmmm… I wonder if there is a source for this besides Miravalle’s book. Its a rather amazing claim and I would think it would have made the news by now.
Well, my answer to your reponse is aimed as though this story is true - thank God it is not. what I said came off wrong - it’s not like I am sitting here praying she gets infertile, but if she has such an attitude towards life - that it was fun to get pregnant and then kill the child for “art”, well then she is abusing what God gives. There are plenty of women out there who cannot have children.BR, it’s a totally unChristian attitude to hope anyone suffers consequences of their sins - after all, where would you or I be if we suffered all the full potential consequences of every one of our past sins?
Pray about what? There is no evidence an abortion occurred. It seems this girl merely got a bunch of attention for menstruating and making it out to be something different. If anything significant came out of this hoax it was that it made people ask this: If it’s not ok to have abortions for the sake of art why isn’t ok for convenience?The only thing I can even think to say about this shocking and stunning episode is pray, pray, pray. Honestly, I am numb.
Prayers and Prayers
Deacon Ed B