Yoga - not just a benign exercise!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grateful_Soul
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh…and if you get a chance…check out WWW.CROSSVEIL.ORG and this gal is Catholic and her website is awesome and gets into this topic. Best site I’ve ever seen for Catholic’s as far as discernment regarding this stuff.
 
Oh…and if you get a chance…check out WWW.CROSSVEIL.ORG and this gal is Catholic and her website is awesome and gets into this topic. Best site I’ve ever seen for Catholic’s as far as discernment regarding this stuff.
Who is the author of that website? I haven’t been able to find that information on the site. There are a great number of accusations made on that website, without reference to where the facts are coming from. There’s also a lot of weirdness there. Since this thread is about Yoga, here’s a quote from the cross and the veil’s article, which is unsigned (no admitted author that I can see), and has zero direct references to either church documents or to reference material on the non-Christian practices the unnamed author demonizes.
We must know how to dissect not only the philosophy of yoga but the flawed logic behind its practices. We must also realize that the greatest lies have the most truth in them. There is much truth in yoga. The Nazi SS were trained to lie as closely to the truth as possible to establish the bond of trust with their victims.
The number one rule of modern debate is this: Once you reference the Nazis, you’ve officially lost the argument, because you’ve essentially resorted to name-calling rather than point-proving. Most (I will not say all) practitioners of Yoga that I have met are good people with good intentions… Not Nazis.

Another quote:
Bhakti Yoga is mixed with other yogic traditions in the case of Amrit Desai, a popular yogi and spiritual leader in America. Recently, numerous female students stepped forward to confirm they had all had sexual relations with him. Westerners, over-impressed with lectures on universal love, are prone to falling into the trap of guru worship, transferring their own dependencies to him. Ministering to someone who has placed all their trust and identity into a person or group is very difficult. The feelings of betrayal and abandonment are overwhelming upon leaving the group or leader, making it very difficult to re-establish trust in God and community again. Psychological boundaries are destroyed or weakened. Deep emotional healing is needed.
Let’s be careful here… Sure, there are sexual abusers in the Yoga movement. I’ve met some of them… However, the news is currently AFLAME with the worldwide priestly sex abuse scandal… Now is NOT the time for Catholics to be painting wide brushes about entire religious movements because of one or a few sexual deviant leaders. Those on the other side of the argument could do the same thing to us, and it would be just as unfair to us as it is to them.
 
Read Marcia’s personal story that I think includes this topic at WWW.CHRISTIANANSWERSFORTHENEWAGE.ORG she is not Catholic but knows her stuff. See what she says.
I was going to say that I liked this lady better than the unknown “cross and the veil” author because she is straightforward about who she is and has lots of hyperlinks to back up her statements… However, she is so Protestant as to use quotation marks when referring to the Desert Fathers as if such a thing couldn’t possibly exist.
Lectio Divina, described by Foster as “spiritual reading” of the Bible, has its own section on Be Still. Lectio Divina, meaning a “sacred reading,” and sometimes called “praying the Scriptures,” is defined and practiced differently by various Christian groups. Although one source claims its origins are unknown (firstplymouth.org/spiritual/prayers/lectio_prayer.html), it allegedly was practiced by the “Desert Fathers” and in monasteries. One definition describes it as “a slow, contemplative praying of the Scriptures which enables the Bible, the Word of God, to become a means of union with God” (thecentering.org/archive.html). A Roman Catholic site states “Lectio divina is a reading, on an individual or communal level, of a more or less lengthy passage of Scripture, received as the word of God and leading, at the prompting of the Spirit, to meditation, prayer and contemplation” (catholic-resources.org/ChurchDocs/PBC_Interp4.htm). The majority of teachings seem to involve choosing a Bible passage and reading it silently and very slowly several times; noticing a portion that speaks to you; repeating that portion aloud over and over but without thinking about it; and then “listening” for what God is saying through the text to you, often ending with a prayer. This can be done alone or with a group.
christiananswersforthenewage.org/Articles_BeStillDVD.html

In this article she references Catholic websites on Lectio, but then argues against the points made in said websites. She clearly thinks that Lectio is not legitimate Christian prayer.
 
www.christiananswersforthenewage.org
www.crossveil.org
These websites are worth checking into regarding the topic of this thread and no one needs to ambush these sites just because they don’t agree. See for yourselves…I was glad I did.
I’m not “ambushing them” because I don’t agree. I’m a theology student, and I have been taught that if one is going to argue Catholic doctrine, one should be able to cite said doctrine.

I also asked the question who is the author of the articles on Cross and Veil… I think that knowing the source of information is a legitimate concern. Especially when said source never quotes a single Church document, yet is being held up here as a bastion of Catholic orthodoxy.
 
I’m not “ambushing them” because I don’t agree. I’m a theology student, and I have been taught that if one is going to argue Catholic doctrine, one should be able to cite said doctrine.

I also asked the question who is the author of the articles on Cross and Veil… I think that knowing the source of information is a legitimate concern. Especially when said source never quotes a single Church document, yet is being held up here as a bastion of Catholic orthodoxy.
You did ambush them. Where are you getting your theology degree ? And please provide Hindu documents to support your point of view about mixing Yoga with Catholicism…after all it is their religion and it is sacred to them…not just an exercise. True Hinduism is quite offended at how America reduces their holy worship postures to mere exercise. It is so much more than that to them.
 
www.christiananswersforthenewage.org
www.crossveil.org
These websites are worth checking into regarding the topic of this thread and no one needs to ambush these sites just because they don’t agree. See for yourselves…I was glad I did.
I’m not even disagreeing with the main point of “C&V’s” article on Yoga, (that it is a Hindu religious practice and therefore incomparable with the Christian Life). I would actually agree with that if the Yoga taught at most fitness centers and YMCAs was anything resembling the Hatha Yoga as taught in India. As one who converted to Christianity from a Hindu cult, I can say with conviction that going to a Yoga class at Gold’s Gym is NOT “practicing yoga”, it is going to an exercise class with takes it’s physical moves and a vague sense of “being mediative” from real Hatha Yoga. This “Yoga” is safe, in my opinion, because it is devoid of the religious aspects of Indian Hatha Yoga. People (including instructors) in this America practice are more interested in getting butts that look good in jeans than in loosing "self"in Shiva (Hindu god of Yoga).

The reason I get upset at sites like C&V isn’t because I disagree with the essence of what they’re saying, but because (as I already said before), ignorant rants about other religions (comparing them to Nazis) does not convert souls to Christ, nor does it glorify Him. It does the exact opposite. Sites like C&V are just “echo chambers” where those who already agree are validated in their beliefs without having to come face to face with the Church’s own documents.

I’m also not one who is unwilling to be convinced of a position outside my current understanding of the faith. Show me the document of the Church that supports your position, explain how it is in support, and if you do a good job, I’ll be more than happy to change my views. I love what the Church loves, and teach what the Church teaches. But I don’t love websites that try to wear Peter’s miter (in terms of teaching authority) without ever actually quoting a single Church document.

I like the stuff on that site about Carmelite spirituality and devotion to the Holy face. The thing is, the other site you referenced contradicts C&V when it comes to Lectio.
 
You did ambush them. Where are you getting your theology degree ? And please provide Hindu documents to support your point of view about mixing Yoga with Catholicism…after all it is their religion and it is sacred to them…not just an exercise. True Hinduism is quite offended at how America reduces their holy worship postures to mere exercise. It is so much more than that to them.
 
You did ambush them. Where are you getting your theology degree ? And please provide Hindu documents to support your point of view about mixing Yoga with Catholicism…after all it is their religion and it is sacred to them…not just an exercise. True Hinduism is quite offended at how America reduces their holy worship postures to mere exercise. It is so much more than that to them.
Well…IF it can be reduced to mere exercises as supposedly then confirmed by Hindus…Or why be offended??? Then there you have it… just an exercise NOT a religion… Once reduced of course.

And see… it’s NOT much more than that (exercise)to US…

I mean seriously, a Hindu could read an entire Mass out of Missle, say all the words and WHAT??? They’d gain nothing from it. They certainly would NOT be successful at converting a wafer and wine into the Body & Blood of Christ… Not even if they wished it were true…
 
You did ambush them. Where are you getting your theology degree ? And please provide Hindu documents to support your point of view about mixing Yoga with Catholicism…after all it is their religion and it is sacred to them…not just an exercise. True Hinduism is quite offended at how America reduces their holy worship postures to mere exercise. It is so much more than that to them.
I agree with you, to a point. I have met many an Indian who are unhappy with the state of Yoga in the USA because it is a secularization of a religious practice… Which is why I believe it to be perfectly safe for Christians… because it is secularized. I’m not encouraging any “mixing”… I’m saying that the practice of Yoga postures in America it totally secularized, which makes them no different from Jazzercize… Which many Indian Yogis would agree with, as you have implied.

In regard to “Hindu documents,” that would be impossible, because:there is no such religion as “Hinduism”. The religious life of India is multifaceted, polytheistic, and decentralized, so there is no internal consensus as to what “Hindu Doctrine” would be,and there is nothing equivalent to the Pope or the Vatican to produce such documents The idea that there is one “Hindu” religion is a Western carry-over from the period of British Imperial occupation of India.

In regard to where I’m getting my theology degree, I decline to answer because in light of direction this is going:
a) I value my anonymity
b) my theological positions are my own, not those of the university I attend.
c) the question is irrelevant because it is an attempt to skirt the question at hand… Where are “C&V’s” theological defenses of its positions,
d) I haven’t stated ANY of my theological positions, so I have no need to defend them. I have simply asked those who have made definitive statements about what is or is not Catholic to defend those positions.
 
I agree with you, to a point. I have met many an Indian who are unhappy with the state of Yoga in the USA because it is a secularization of a religious practice… Which is why I believe it to be perfectly safe for Christians… because it is secularized. I’m not encouraging any “mixing”… I’m saying that the practice of Yoga postures in America it totally secularized, which makes them no different from Jazzercize… Which many Indian Yogis would agree with, as you have implied.

In regard to “Hindu documents,” that would be impossible, because:there is no such religion as “Hinduism”. The religious life of India is multifaceted, polytheistic, and decentralized, so there is no internal consensus as to what “Hindu Doctrine” would be,and there is nothing equivalent to the Pope or the Vatican to produce such documents The idea that there is one “Hindu” religion is a Western carry-over from the period of British Imperial occupation of India.

In regard to where I’m getting my theology degree, I decline to answer because in light of direction this is going:
a) I value my anonymity
b) my theological positions are my own, not those of the university I attend.
c) the question is irrelevant because it is an attempt to skirt the question at hand… Where are “C&V’s” theological defenses of its positions,
d) I haven’t stated ANY of my theological positions, so I have no need to defend them. I have simply asked those who have made definitive statements about what is or is not Catholic to defend those positions.
Wow…a bit shocked since you expected so much documentation from others before on this thread. I just really appreciate the opportunity to share information freely and honestly and for others to do the same for me so I can continue to learn. Another great thing to Google to learn more about this current topic…would be to Google “Kundalini Yoga &Lucifer”. Worth learning…at least for me it was. God bless.
 
That was…to google “Kundalini Yoga&Lucifer”. Where does the Catholic Church stand on this? Will keep reading and praying.
 
.would be to Google “Kundalini Yoga &Lucifer”. Worth learning…at least for me it was. God bless.
And see, this is where I think a good practicing Catholic will automatically not get involved. If you just go to youtube, and search Kundalini, and listen to some of their talk… It’s all about some form of “spirituality”… they are NOT talking exercise.

I had some people recommend it… and within 2 minutes of watching the clips… Ummm… No way buster! That conflicts.

But when you take a typical gym style yoga… there is no “spiritual” teaching of any sort. At least not in MY experience. It’s… feel those abs. Feel those glutes…

And it’s AGAIN… go back to the original VATICAN article… it’s about new age SPIRITUALITY! Not exercise… Hence the warning…

Yoga as a spiritual journey = from a catholic perspective = BAD!

Yoga for exercises… probably fine!

Although, I was just thinking a few minutes ago, after my last post. I do pray that God will guide me to all that is good for my soul… and that I’m able to figure out the directions so to speak…

So, maybe that’s why, I’m super excited about some other forms of exercise right now!! 😉
 
Wow…a bit shocked since you expected so much documentation from others before on this thread. I just really appreciate the opportunity to share information freely and honestly and for others to do the same for me so I can continue to learn. Another great thing to Google to learn more about this current topic…would be to Google “Kundalini Yoga &Lucifer”. Worth learning…at least for me it was. God bless.
My question is still not answered… Do you know who wrote the articles on C&V?

I am legitimately interested in an answer

What exactly do you want me to document, other than my university, which I have said is not up for discussion? One could find any number of quotes from Indian religious leaders to defend one’s positions either way on Yoga postures… This still wouldn’t say anything definitive because, as I said, there is no such thing as definitive “Hinduism”.

Talking about Hinduism as a cohesive religion is like saying there’s a religion called “Americanism”. This would be a pseudo-christian concept, but would equally include American Catholics, all mainline Protestant groups, Mormons, JWs, Neo-Gnostics from California, any New-Ager with a vague love for Jesus… the list goes on and on. That gives you a little taste of what you’re talking about when you use the word “Hinduism”. It’s a word that has no meaning inside India.
 
Thank you so much for giving me " a little taste of what I call Hinduism". I really appreciate it. Hope you take time to google…“Kundalini Yoga & Lucifer”…just for the sake of being able to give anybody and everybody a little taste of the Occult…and we can all stand to learn more as I did from you. God bless you.
 
Thank you so much for giving me " a little taste of what I call Hinduism". I really appreciate it. Hope you take time to google…“Kundalini Yoga & Lucifer”…just for the sake of being able to give anybody and everybody a little taste of the Occult…and we can all stand to learn more as I did from you. God bless you.
Do you think it is possible for something to be un-Christian and not Satanic?

I have no personal experience with Kundalini Yoga, and so I cannot make an educated comment on it. Kundalini Yoga is a specific form of Hatha Yoga whose focus is spiritual or religious in nature, so I"d agree that such a thing may not be comparable with Christian belief…

I did your google search… the 2nd hit takes on right back to this very forum thread, which confirms what I felt beforehand, that such a search quiry is very circular in nature. It is an artificial pariing of two things which probably don’t go together, and only results in web pages which confirm what you already believe.

Indian religion is not devil worship. It is not the teaching of the Church to believe that something is Satanic simply because it is un-Christian. From Nostra Aetate (2):
Religions, however, that are bound up with an advanced culture have struggled to answer the same questions by means of more refined concepts and a more developed language. Thus in Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through an inexhaustible abundance of myths and through searching philosophical inquiry. They seek freedom from the anguish of our human condition either through ascetical practices or profound meditation or a flight to God with love and trust. Again, Buddhism, in its various forms, realizes the radical insufficiency of this changeable world; it teaches a way by which men, in a devout and confident spirit, may be able either to acquire the state of perfect liberation, or attain, by their own efforts or through higher help, supreme illumination. Likewise, other religions found everywhere try to counter the restlessness of the human heart, each in its own manner, by proposing “ways,” comprising teachings, rules of life, and sacred rites. The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. Indeed, she proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.
The Church, therefore, exhorts her sons, that through dialogue and collaboration with the followers of other religions, carried out with prudence and love and in witness to the Christian faith and life, they recognize, preserve and promote the good things, spiritual and moral, as well as the socio-cultural values found among these men.
vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

So. The Bishops tell us that you are right. Kundalini Yoga is likely a non-Christian religious practice which should be avoided by the God-centered Christian. However, they also tell us that it is not Satanic simply because it is not Christianity.

I would also like to point out that I wasn’t particularly fond of Yoga postures back before I was Christian, and I don’t do them now. I’m just trying to present a different perspective in this discussion.
 
Do you think it is possible for something to be un-Christian and not Satanic?
Well, of course. As long as you don’t think of UNChristian as meaning the same thing as ANTIChristian.

Many elements of the Jewish faith, for example, since it predated Christ, are necessarily UNChristian. The dietary laws which Christianity has rejected, for example.

But, Judaism being the elder brother faithwise of Christianity, such things certainly not Satanic, on the contrary.
 
Well, of course. As long as you don’t think of UNChristian as meaning the same thing as ANTIChristian.

Many elements of the Jewish faith, for example, since it predated Christ, are necessarily UNChristian. The dietary laws which Christianity has rejected, for example.

But, Judaism being the elder brother faithwise of Christianity, such things certainly not Satanic, on the contrary.
This is exactly what I’m getting at with my quote from Vatican II. Just because something is UN-Christian doesn’t make it ANTI-Christian. That’s a much simpler way of stating what I was trying to say, thanks LilyM. 👍

Vatican II tells us that it is not only those PRE-Christian forms of religious faith, (which you mention), but also those religious forms unrelated to the Christian faith, which have positive attributes. I’m not saying that Christians should be mixing Buddhist religious beliefs with their Christianity. But I am saying that accusing them of being concealed devil worship or comparing them to Nazis is neither Truth nor helpful in Glorifying God or Church, nor is it an orthodox Catholic position based on the Church’s documents. In Dominus Iesus, 19, we read:
To state the inseparable relationship between Christ and the kingdom is not to overlook the fact that the kingdom of God — even if considered in its historical phase — is not identified with the Church in her visible and social reality. In fact, “the action of Christ and the Spirit outside the Church’s visible boundaries” must not be excluded.
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000806_dominus-iesus_en.html

Also, in paragraph 21, we read:
Certainly, the various religious traditions contain and offer religious elements which come from God, and which are part of what “the Spirit brings about in human hearts and in the history of peoples, in cultures, and religions”. Indeed, some prayers and rituals of the other religions may assume a role of preparation for the Gospel, in that they are occasions or pedagogical helps in which the human heart is prompted to be open to the action of God. One cannot attribute to these, however, a divine origin or an ex opere operato salvific efficacy, which is proper to the Christian sacraments. Furthermore, it cannot be overlooked that other rituals, insofar as they depend on superstitions or other errors (cf. 1 Cor 10:20-21), constitute an obstacle to salvation.
Even if Yoga practices (even the dreaded KUNDALINI Yoga) fall under the category of “other rituals…based on superstition or other errors [which] constitute an obstacle to salvation” (and I am most certainly NOT convinced of this), then it is still NOT satanic, but a misunderstanding of God’s revelation in light of the fact that the Indian tradition which created Hatha Yoga was created before the coming of Jesus Christ into the world and his living explanation of the nature of God. Misunderstanding who God is but still Loving Him is a far cry from worshiping Satan.
 
Thank you so much for giving me " a little taste of what I call Hinduism". I really appreciate it. Hope you take time to google…“Kundalini Yoga & Lucifer”…just for the sake of being able to give anybody and everybody a little taste of the Occult…and we can all stand to learn more as I did from you. God bless you.
You’re welcome.

I know I come off as aggressive or overly intellectual, and demand proofs. I’m sorry if it’s overzealous. I’d just like to see a greater reference to the Church’s documents on these forums, because the more I read them, the more I LOVE Christ’s Church.

I also demand an even-minded view of the “other”, because I have been “the other” before, and my view of the Christian faith (and even of Jesus) was deeply injured. It was by His Grace, and the intercessions of St. Francis that my heart was softened to His ways and I was able to be basked in the Glory of His Sacraments.

Whether or not New Age practices are good (most probably are not), when we discuss them, we are talking about the practices of people who, for the most part, are sincere seekers of God. When we say that practices they love are Satanic, it is a turn-off for them, because a tenant of the New Age is that evil and sin don’t really exist. Therefore, I think that when talking to these folks, and seeking their conversion, God is much better served when we laud those forms of their practice which are of God, which have the potential to draw them to the Gospels. This encouragement and drawing will serve the Church much better than pushing them away by fear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top