If you are going to be a creationist then please keep up to date with what other creationists are saying:‘
Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed.’
Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs.
Source: Creation Ministries International -
Arguments we think creationists should NOT use.
You can read the same piece on the Answer in Genesis website
here. An argument that does not convince either AiG or CMI is hardly likely to convince anyone else.
rossum
Good morning. Just returned from a pleasant interlude by a lake and noticed right away that you ET’s sure like to have fun with quoting select disagreements amongst those of us who support Genesis 1-11 — like fossil human footprints with dinosaurian ones. This disagreement is due in part to a lack of a statistical amount of footprint data on the part of those pioneering Texans who each time they excavate they have to get permission of the land owner and pay big bucks. The footprint disagreement is a minor one compared to the disagreements between the many differing hypotheses of theistic and atheistic evolutionists — it’s like night and day.
Here is what AIG said in the link you provided. Do not use.
‘Paluxy tracks to prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed.’
and I quote:
“Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs. However there is much evidence that dinosaurs and humans co-existed—see Q&A: Dinosaurs.”
Since you like to quote AIG now read some of AIG’s arguments for the coexistence of dinosaurs with men, flood of Noah and a young earth.
Couple the above many arguments by AIG; the pioneering direct C-14 dating of dinosaur bone organics and bone bioapatite as well as other fossils; and, dinosaur depictions world-wide such as Egypt, Cambodia, Israel, USA, Mexico, Peru etc the only logical conclusion is that the existence of fossil human footprints with dinosaurs is not surpising. Therefore “It’s a young earth after all.”
I again repeat that none of this footprint data, C-14 data and Mosaics in Egypt and Israel can be forged; for example the “human toe tips can not be carved” in hard concrete-type limestone." It is only that when the original 16 inch long “pristine” human footprints next to dinosaur footprints were being observed by the press from Dallas TX in 1982 an evolutionary monitor claimed “I saw him carve the human-like toes on the elongate impressions” when in fact he was "cleaning out the hardpan clay in the ball of the foot and toe area. That “carving LIE” has permeated the discussion and has caused untold hardship for anyone trying to perform research there which is exactly why there is insufficient funds available to finish the research.
Ideally since it has now been confirmed there are fossil human footprints with dinosaur footprints on the “river bottom” [three trails] and “pristine ones” on the second strata on the shelves above the river it’s only logical to see what is on the third, fourth, and fifth strata. The CEM museum
www.creationevidence.org ] can’t get permission to do.so; otherwise there might well be a “statistical” amount of data that would be the final nail in the evolutionary coffin.
LIke Cathllic philosopher, Professor emeritus Dr. Larry Azar’s book, “Evolution and Other Fairy Tales” suggests, evolution theory of whatever stripe is NOT a theory of origins. Furthermore, I would suggest that evolution of life from a common lancestor over billions of years is not even a good hypothesis no matter who claims it has merit.
