A
Ad_Pondus_Omniu
Guest
To be one of those I understand that one has to already be a numerary.Yes, you’re right. I was focusing on the numerary priests.
To be one of those I understand that one has to already be a numerary.Yes, you’re right. I was focusing on the numerary priests.
That’s correct. That’s the example I gave in the earlier post. A numerary man can be approached and invited to become a priest, and he is free to accept or decline.To be one of those I understand that one has to already be a numerary.
That’s what I believed, although I wasn’t sure. It all depends what kind of life appeals to the person the most, there are many different kinds (solitary, monastic, contemplative, mendicant, missionary, priestly, etc). All are noble and are beautiful, bur aren’t for everyone. Do a lot of research.That’s correct. That’s the example I gave in the earlier post. A numerary man can be approached and invited to become a priest, and he is free to accept or decline.
Oops! Sorry, I made my comment about no one mentioning Miles Christi without reading the whole thread and missed yours.Miles Christi priests are awesome! Their charism is to preach the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius and they offer weekend retreats all over the country. I have just signed up for my fourth annual retreat with them.
I believe their formation period is a bit longer than some. The seminary is in Argentina and all of the priests I have met are fluent in Spanish.
I heard they were very liberal, could be mistaken though, I don’t know.The Society of the Divine Word.
Where did you hear that from? The Society of the Divine Word is as Catholic as they come and is in very good standing with the Church. The Society is a missionary order and her members hail from numerous countries across the world. Most communities are multicultural in composition, but this hardly makes them liberal or conservative. No, I would say the Society of the Divine Word is extremely faithful to the Church and the Gospel of the Lord.I heard they were very liberal, could be mistaken though, I don’t know.
I think (I could be wrong) that Ad Pondus Omniu meant that liturgically, they may be liberal.Where did you hear that from? The Society of the Divine Word is as Catholic as they come and is in very good standing with the Church. The Society is a missionary order and her members hail from numerous countries across the world. Most communities are multicultural in composition, but this hardly makes them liberal or conservative. No, I would say the Society of the Divine Word is extremely faithful to the Church and the Gospel of the Lord.
I would say that they use the same liturgy the rest of the Church uses. They are merely a religious order and follow the liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church. They have not created their own liturgy. I’m not sure what you mean by liberal.I think (I could be wrong) that Ad Pondus Omniu meant that liturgically, they may be liberal.
For instance, the Jesuits are (generally speaking) a good order. However, if you attend their masses, most of the time, the church doesn’t have kneelers, the priests wear the stole on the outside of the chasuble, and a lot of the times, the color of their vestments could be mistaken for a rainbow blanket. That, I consider to be liberal.I would say that they use the same liturgy the rest of the Church uses. They are merely a religious order and follow the liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church. They have not created their own liturgy. I’m not sure what you mean by liberal.
Really? I don’t. Besides, the SVD is a missionary order which means that not all their churches have kneelers. Sometimes they don’t even have roofs. Sometimes it is hard for a missionary to carry a complete set of liturgical vestments and equipment on the back of his motorcycle as he attempts to navigate a jungle trail in the highlands of New Guinea. Besides that, the two day trips to cover 60 miles kind of wear you out. It is true that as missionaries, the SVD are interested in enculturation in order to make the Gospel of the Lord accessible to those who have yet to hear it, but this is hardly “liberal.” The Jesuits did the exact same thing in India, Japan, China, South America, and elsewhere, as did other religious orders, and indeed, as did St. Paul, so I don’t think this constitutes a liberal approach to either theology or liturgy. Other than this, every Church I’ve been in that is served by the SVD in Europe and America does indeed have kneelers and the proper liturgical vestements are worn.For instance, the Jesuits are (generally speaking) a good order. However, if you attend their masses, most of the time, the church doesn’t have kneelers, the priests wear the stole on the outside of the chasuble, and a lot of the times, the color of their vestments could be mistaken for a rainbow blanket. That, I consider to be liberal.
I must add that not all Jesuits are liberal and some are very orthodox.![]()
Well, we will have to agree to disagree.Really? I don’t. Besides, the SVD is a missionary order which means that not all their churches have kneelers. Sometimes they don’t even have roofs. Sometimes it is hard for a missionary to carry a complete set of liturgical vestments and equipment on the back of his motorcycle as he attempts to navigate a jungle trail in the highlands of New Guinea. Besides that, the two day trips to cover 60 miles kind of wear you out. It is true that as missionaries, the SVD are interested in enculturation in order to make the Gospel of the Lord accessible to those who have yet to hear it, but this is hardly “liberal.” The Jesuits did the exact same thing in India, Japan, China, South America, and elsewhere, as did other religious orders, and indeed, as did St. Paul, so I don’t think this constitutes a liberal approach to either theology or liturgy. Other than this, every Church I’ve been in that is served by the SVD in Europe and America does indeed have kneelers and the proper liturgical vestements are worn.