S
SSPXwannaB
Guest
what do you think of this organization? thank you.
My experiences with Jesuits have always been positive. In my experience, they focus more on intellectual development and philosophy than spirituality but I’ve always been around them in secular settings.what do you think of this organization? thank you.
There are tradition-minded Jesuits, but I don’t know of any that offer the TLM or promote a traditional Catholic sprituality. They are certainly not widespread.I feel similarly. When I read of their history I thought that they were awesome. But when I see what some of them stand for today, and the state of a Jesuit University I attended I am disappointed.
Are there dif’t factions (left and right)?
I must admit that they always seem disciplined and are always smarter than myself (and I am smarter than 90% of Americans academically speaking).
What other orders tend to be leftist? Others that tend to Traditionalism?
I agree. They seem to have lost their orginal focus, and appear to me to be more of the world than apart from it. Of course Fr. Mitch on EWTN is a Jesuit so they aren’t totally a lost cause!I feel similarly. When I read of their history I thought that they were awesome. But when I see what some of them stand for today, and the state of a Jesuit University I attended I am disappointed.
Are there dif’t factions (left and right)?
I must admit that they always seem disciplined and are always smarter than myself (and I am smarter than 90% of Americans academically speaking).
What other orders tend to be leftist? Others that tend to Traditionalism?
Well I’m not WRC, but… the Carmelites? No, they’re too strict to be liberals. The Benedictines? On the whole I really don’t know, but I’ve been to a Benedictine Priory in Vermont that was crazy liberal. Crazy. Liberal. Crazy.WhollyRoamin
can it then be said that Carmelites and Benedictines are generally more conservative?
Me TOO!!!I went to a Jesuit University, and my experiences while there brought me back to the Church.
:tsktsk:However, modern Jesuits are often essentially heretics.
And Fr. Kenneth Baker. And Fr. Joseph Fessio. And Fr. William Stout.I agree. They seem to have lost their orginal focus, and appear to me to be more of the world than apart from it. Of course Fr. Mitch on EWTN is a Jesuit so they aren’t totally a lost cause!
A number of Jesuit universities are not doing a good job of enforcing orthodoxy, I agree. But I’d say that such a situation is not unique to the Jesuits. A good number of diocesean priests have also gone astray. And I know some fully faithful Franciscians and some Franciscians that St. Francis himself would admonish.I have seen some disturbing unorthodox positions taken by the Jesuits, and attended a Jesuit University whish was awash in support fr paganism and I was shocked to find ‘flaming’ homosexual Priests that never wore their Roman collar. But as I stated earlier they are always brilliantly smart, and I used to attend a conservative Catholic Church (an anomaly in urban California) that had a seemingly repectable Jesuit from India.
Qo Jesuits have a formal habit?
A:Jesuits do not have an official habit. In the Constitutions of the Society, it gives these instructions concerning clothing; [BGCOLOR=“Yellow”]"The clothing too should have three characteristics: first, it should be proper; second, conformed to the usage of the country of residence; and third, not contradictory to the poverty we profess…” [/BGCOLOR](Const. 577)
Indeed, if clerical attire would be a big distraction to whatever the work they are doing at the time, they are bound to not wear a roman collar. I’m not saying that’s what happened in your disillusioning contact with a Jesuit, just that they always won’t be dressed to suit your expectations.Historically, a “Jesuit-style cassock” became standard issue: it wrapped around the body and was tied with a cincture, rather than the customary buttoned front, a tuftless biretta (only diocesan clergy wore tufts), and a simple cape. As such, though Jesuit garb appeared distinctive, and became identifiable over time, it was the common priestly dress of Ignatius’ day. During the missionary periods of the Continental Americas, the various American Indian tribes referred to Jesuits as “Blackrobes” because of their black cassocks. Today, most Jesuits wear the Roman collar tab shirts in non-liturgical, ministerial settings.
Thank you, but I know what “conservative” means. I also know how it’s used, how its misued and how its abused. The truth is that it’s not a very useful term here. “Favoring traditional view and values” certainly depends on how far back you’re willing to study tradition (and Tradition). A good number of people who proclaim themselves to be conservative on some subject or another don’t have the foggiest idea of what, exactly, they are conserving. “Tending to oppose change” is inherent to Catholicism except where it’s not. And it is not particular to any Catholic Order, Rule, Abbey or Friary. They all change. They all stay the same. And it’s not a matter of extent, just subject. Even the Carthusians have changed over the years-- and they’re about as isolated from the world as a reclusive order can be!WhollyRoamin, have too respectfully disagree w/ you:
con·ser·va·tive (kn-sûrv-tv)
adj.
- Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.