F
Flopfoot
Guest
If you take away child support payments there’ll be more abortions because men will pressure women into having sex more since there’s no downside for them
Not necessarily. If the welfare payments being ponied up by the taxpayers for children born out of wedlock are sufficiently high, it would encourage more sexual relations but also a lot more childbirth too. Particularly among gals with no other marketable “skills.”If you take away child support payments there’ll be more abortions because men will pressure women into having sex more since there’s no downside for them
Is this comment acceptable?Not necessarily. If the welfare payments being ponied up by the taxpayers for children born out of wedlock are sufficiently high, it would encourage more sexual relations but also a lot more childbirth too. Particularly among gals with no other marketable “skills.”
I was just giving my analysis based upon many years of observation. I’ve seen enough young ladies in high school in poverty areas rush out to get pregnant so they can get their own check and their own apartment in the projects.Is this comment acceptable?
You may believe that is what you were doing. I read you as making a generalisation that is hurtful and insulting to mothers.I was just giving my analysis based upon many years of observation. I’ve seen enough young ladies in high school in poverty areas rush out to get pregnant so they can get their own check and their own apartment in the projects.
Either way it points out a truth…having a baby with daddy government is easier than parenting with a man. No need to rely on a man? Seems like a perk.Augustinian:![]()
You may believe that is what you were doing. I read you as making a generalisation that is hurtful and insulting to mothers.I was just giving my analysis based upon many years of observation. I’ve seen enough young ladies in high school in poverty areas rush out to get pregnant so they can get their own check and their own apartment in the projects.
You have done it too. You are smearing the reputation of mothers.Either way it points out a truth…having a baby with daddy government is easier than parenting with a man. No need to rely on a man? Seems like a perk.
I’m speaking as a parent.Xanthippe_Voorhees:![]()
You have done it too. You are smearing the reputation of mothers.Either way it points out a truth…having a baby with daddy government is easier than parenting with a man. No need to rely on a man? Seems like a perk.
Please give us an example of how an unborn child could be saved by money (whatever the amount is).So in the context of the Irish referendum I have been wondering about the commitment of individual Catholics to individual human life as they see it. If, by giving much of your net worth, you could save the life of an unborn child, would you? And if yes, why have you not done so before now, as many such opportunities must have presented themselves?