H
Hospitaller
Guest
My point is that interpretation, without a central teaching authority, is then left up in the air, and it seems to me that the most “faithful” Muslims are those following the historical precedent of carrying out war against the non-believers.Ofcourse it varies, because people vary. Some people wake up at 3 am and pray for 1 hour. Some people do the basics. Some people are able to understand the Quran at a much deeper level while others skim the surface.
What is your point? In Islam, we are given clear direction on how to behave and how not to behave. On what is pleasing to God and what is not.
Please, elaborate on your statement.
Now, I’m hoping that Joe Monahan doesn’t use that statement as a pretext to make good on his threat to ban me, but looking at historical Islamic teachings, it seems to me that there’s quite a strong precedent set for violence.
For example, according to Abu Dawud, a captured enemy may be chained as a slave, tortured to extract information or killed out of hand, modern examples of which we’ve seen enacted in Iraq.
I’m aware of that, but it doesn’t happen to be *my *country’s foreign policy, although I support it.lol.
Its ok to critizise your countries foreign policy you know.
I thought this seemed appropriate:Agreeing to everythign your country does is un-ameican and un-patriotic…it makes nodding cowards of us all.
“It may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you like a thing that is bad for you.”