R
Rainaldo
Guest
Hate is not welcome here.All Hail Traditional Catholics!!! :bowdown: We are unworthy to be in the presence of your holiness. Please pray for us pagans who dont have latin in any of our masses!!
Hate is not welcome here.All Hail Traditional Catholics!!! :bowdown: We are unworthy to be in the presence of your holiness. Please pray for us pagans who dont have latin in any of our masses!!
That was not hate, it was sarcasm but its offensive to say the youth day mass was irreverent because it wasnt done to the rubrics.Hate is not welcome here.
It’s not offensive. That’s speaking plainly. It is irreverent when it is not done according to the rubrics.That was not hate, it was sarcasm but its offensive to say the youth day mass was irreverent because it wasnt done to the rubrics.
Are you saying that masses celebrated by Blessed JPII in Africa were irreverent too?It’s not offensive. That’s speaking plainly. It is irreverent when it is not done according to the rubrics.
Did you forget to take your meds today? Let’s stay calm…All Hail Traditional Catholics!!! :bowdown: We are unworthy to be in the presence of your holiness. Please pray for us pagans who dont have latin in any of our masses!!
Please look up sarcasm in a dictionaryDid you forget to take your meds today?
The rubrics are there for a reason. If you have an issue with a specific rubric that’s one thing, but you’re basically just trying to tell me that the rubrics hold no weight and can just be ignored. Are you sure that you want to defend that argument?Are you saying that masses celebrated by Blessed JPII in Africa were irreverent too?
Im not saying that at all because we do need the rubrics. Its not like we are changing words of consecration here. Like JPII did in his masses was to allow the local culture take part. For special occasions, I see nothing wrong here.The rubrics are there for a reason. If you have an issue with a specific rubric that’s one thing, but you’re basically just trying to tell me that the rubrics hold no weight and can just be ignored. Are you sure that you want to defend that argument?
Then for the sake of simplicity let’s just discuss the liturgical dancing aspect. The Vatican has stated vehemently that dance is not allowed during the liturgy, at least in the United States (some exceptions were granted for Africa and Asia, but even that is very subdued and highly reverent based on the culture). With this in mind, are you okay with liturgical dance being formed at the Youth Day Liturgy?Im not saying that at all because we do need the rubrics. Its not like we are changing words of consecration here. Like JPII did in his masses was to allow the local culture take part. For special occasions, I see nothing wrong here.
Here’s a sample of the reverence I see: youtube.com/watch?v=Vpt9XXYHd18&t=78m58sAre you saying that masses celebrated by Blessed JPII in Africa were irreverent too?
What exactly is the local culture of Los Angeles? “Allowing the local culture” doesn’t mean the newest fads.Im not saying that at all because we do need the rubrics. Its not like we are changing words of consecration here. Like JPII did in his masses was to allow the local culture take part. For special occasions, I see nothing wrong here.
And sometimes the “local culture” is a culture that shouldn’t be celebrated… I think the culture of LA might fit into that category.What exactly is the local culture of Los Angeles? “Allowing the local culture” doesn’t mean the newest fads.