Zen Meditation: Theory and Practice

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntiTheist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AntiTheist

Guest
Part 1 of 2

As you can tell from my screen name, my posts on this site are generally anti-religious, but today I want to post about a spiritual practice – and I’ll call it a “spiritual practice” for lack of a better term – that has proven very useful to me. It’s the Zen practice of meditation, what is sometimes called “Zazen” in that tradition. It is, as you will see, a practice that any person, of any religion (or no religion), can benefit from.

First, a little theory behind the practice. Most people – myself included – spend the vast majority of their time in their heads. Now, when I say that, I don’t just mean that a lot of people tend to be idealistic and have their heads in the clouds and come up with impractical ideas. I mean that we spend most of our time engaging with our thoughts about reality rather than reality itself. In a very literal way, we spend most of our time in our heads.

For example, have you ever driven somewhere while you were thinking about a problem you have, and when you arrived at the destination, you realized that you can hardly remember any details about the ride? Or have you ever had a family member make a decorating change to a room that you frequent, and the change escaped your notice for an embarassingly long time?

It’s a well-known fact that our senses take in more information than our brains can process. What our minds do is to form a mental map of the environment, and it’s this map that we’re usually caught up in evaluating, rather than the world that’s in front of our noses. As a result, we’re liable to miss details in the real world, and, in our rush to filter the world through our mental map, we’re very likely to misperceive.

There are, incidentally, very good evolutionary reasons that our brains developed this way. Having brains that can quickly size up an area and filter out all of the extraneous details is, obviously, very conducive to survival. It also aids survival to have a brain that can use its mental map to do basic tasks – like navigate a path – on “autopilot” so that the rest of the bra(name removed by moderator)ower can be used to reflect on problems not currently present in the environment. It’s those same tendencies, passed down to us, that today let us direct a lot of our attention to our mental patterns instead of reality.

So here we are in the modern world with these brains that are always caught up in spinning stories about reality and constructing relatively accurate but still somewhat faulty mental models. We spend most of our lives daydreaming. We go through our day thinking about pleasant memories of the past, worrying about stuff that just happened to us, hoping that we’re going to get that raise, dreaming of a peaceful, relaxing end to the day, wondering whether so-and-so got our letter, assuming that so-and-so doesn’t like us, criticizing the way so-and-so dresses, thinking that so-and-so is annoying, thinking that the guy who just cut us off is the worst person ever who did something horrible and needs to be taught a lesson and and and (don’t laugh – there are many cases on record of altercations and even deaths that have resulted due to “road rage,” which is a fancy name for the phenomenon of macho dummies mistaking this particularly aggressive mental pattern for reality)…etc.

Whew! It’s exhausting how much mental work we do during the day instead of looking the present moment squarely in the face. And before you know it, the day is over…and we’ve missed a lot of it.

Now, there’s nothing “bad” about any of this (in fact, as I indicated above, it’s the way that nature has made our brains to work), but the drawback is that we end up living in the imaginary worlds we construct. It might be a perfectly beautiful day, but your worry about something that’s going to happen at the end of the week might ruin it for you. There might be song birds building a nest in your backyard, but your wondering about whether so-and-so likes you is going to keep you anxious and prevent you from noticing and enjoying it. There’s a whole world of interesting activity going on around you all the time, but if you’re preoccupied with the world that your mind has constructed, you’re going to dream your entire life away.

Now, obviously, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t worry about things or get angry about things or plan for things or whatever – but there’s a big difference between experiencing an emotion in the moment and spinning a story about it in your head for the next twenty minutes (or more!).

Worse still, the mental worlds we construct can end up vastly different from the real world. Back in the wild, our ancient ancestors developed brains that jumped to conclusions – they heard a twig snap and they perceived DANGER (whether or not there really was danger)…that’s what made them run away and live to pass on those conclusion-jumping tendencies (the ones who didn’t run away would tend to get eaten and not pass on those genes). Nowadays, we see an innocent gesture from someone or hear an innocent remark from someone, and we jump to assumptions as well: “He doesn’t like me!” or “He’s mad at me!” or “I knew I shouldn’t have done X, Y, or Z! Now I’ll never get him to sponser my membership to the National Association of Hat-Wearers,” or whatever.

Pretty soon, we’ll start worrying about what to do about this guy being mad at us, and then we’ll start imagining what he must think of us, and…before you know it, we’re having a daydream about something totally unconnected to reality – we’re not just spending our time worrying pointlessly about something, we’re worrying pointlessly over one of our own fantasies!
 
Part 2 of 2:

So what’s the cure for our tendency to do this? Why, Zen Meditation of course.

Here’s how to do it:
  1. Find a quiet place where you can be alone for five minutes (start with only five minutes of practice…don’t push yourself too hard).
  2. Sit in a comfortable position. Sitting in a chair with your hands on your lap works perfectly fine.
  3. Let go of all of your thoughts and focus all of your attention on the present moment. This is a little harder than it sounds but not really as hard as some books/teachers make it out to be. Most practitioners begin by paying attention to their breath, so that’s a good place to start. You can also try to focus on the vast amounts of data being taken in by all of your senses. Really look at the environment, hear the cars driving by, smell the stale air of your attic, really feel what it’s like to be sitting here and breathing at this particular moment, feel what it’s like to be experiencing all of these senses.
You spend your whole life rushing around, telling yourself stories about everything. These five minutes are for you to finally shut up and enjoy the fact that you exist. Just let go of all of those stories and thoughts…just for five minutes.
  1. During this practice, you will – naturally – start having thoughts. Don’t fight that. When you have a thought, experience the thought and then bring your awareness back to the moment. For example, your first thought will probably be something like, “I’m doing it! I’m shutting off my mind and meditating…oops, I just had a thought.” So you then say to yourself, “Having a thought about meditating…having a feeling that I just messed up.” Really feel what it’s like to think and feel those things, and then bring your awareness back to your breath.
You might see your shirt in the corner of the room and start thinking, “Oh, there’s the shirt my wife bought for me back in the summer of 2005 when we went on that family trip to Florida.” So you watch yourself have that thought and you think, “Having a thought about vacation,” and then you bring yourself right back to the moment, right back to your breath, right back to the experience of your senses taking in the shirt (the sense impression over which your mind places those thoughts and memories).

You might start feeling bored. So you say to yourself, “Having a thought that I’m bored.” And you go right back to the present moment. One of the first things you’ll learn, if you keep this practice up, is that “boredom” is a story that you tell yourself about reality, nothing more. One of the nicest early benefits of the practice is the revelation that boredom doesn’t exist…it’s really quite neat because you will pretty soon never be bored again.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve sat around waiting for something and just decided to focus on all of the minute details in the present moment instead of focusing on the story my mind was telling me (“Arrgh! This is taking so long! Why am I here? I should be doing X, Y, Z…”). You can’t be bored if you’re paying attention to reality because boredom only exists in your head.
  1. The first time you try this, you will probably find it exhausting to keep this up for five minutes. As I noted, our brains weren’t designed to focus on the present moment, so it takes an incredible amount of willpower to keep this up for even a short amount of time. Maybe add a minute or a half a minute every day until you can do it for fifteen minutes straight (it might very well take a long time to get up to fifteen minutes, so don’t be hard on yourself. Take your time with it).
Some meditation texts talk about all kinds of mystical experiences that can result from this practice (you know, the famous “one with everything” feeling, and more). Those things – which I call “mental fireworks” – happen to pretty much everyone who meditates every day. Do yourself a favor and don’t attribtue any supernatural significance to them. They’re weird tricks of the brain, nothing more.

The point of meditation isn’t to achieve mental fireworks, and it isn’t to change anything about your life. It’s hard for people to get that through their heads, especially here in the West. People think that they’re supposed to meditate to get “results,” to become “better” people or to not get so angry or to solve this problem or that problem. But they’re wrong. “Problems” of all sorts are stories that your mind tells you. They’re part of the mental model you construct to guide you through life. Meditation is the act of letting go of all of those stories, just for a little while. That is the result of meditation – sitting quietly and experiencing the moment – and it is a marvelous result.

And ironically, if you keep up a meditation practice, you will start noticing big changes in the ways you conceive of your life and handle your reactions – but you’ll only start making those changes when you stop trying to make those changes. It sounds backwards, but that’s how it is.

For example, you will find that this practice actually sharpens your ability to perceive during your daily life. Before long, you’ll notice yourself “snapping out” of daydreams more quickly and taking your time to savor the little things in daily life. You’ll feel emotions fully but not have to get sucked in by the stories that your mind inevitably tells about them.

And it all starts with this moment right here.

Ok, so I’ve ranted for long enough on this subject. I’ll open the floor to comments and questions. Discuss.
 
You can never be anywhere else than here. You can never be anywhen else than now. If you want to do anything then you have to do it here and now.
Absolutely. But evolution has equipped us all with minds that want to be anywhere but here and now.

That’s conducive to survival, but it’s not always so conducive to human happiness. We evolved to survive, not to be happy.
Thankyou for your posts.
You’re welcome. Thanks for the response.
 
I’m not totally sure what the rules are for “bumping” a thread, but I’m posting a response here to help someone else – whom I directed to this thread – find it. Don’t worry, though: I am not going to keep bumping this until someone responds. If no one is interested, I’m more than happy to allow it to slip away into obscurity.

However, there was a good point brought up by Contrarini in another thread about morality and “transforming narratives” – relevant to my posts above – that I answered really well, only to find that thread vanished when I looked for it the next day. In another day or so, I’ll post the question and my response – to the best of my ability to remember – right here for your reading pleasure.
 
:rolleyes:

And this is why an honest atheist ceases first to be either an atheist or imagine he is non-religious.

Welcome to the first step, AntiTheist.

Pax Christi from a former (and I dare say, much better) anti-Theist.
Tim
 
I agree that we live too much time in the world of our thoughts. I’ve realized over the past few years that most of my unhappiness in life comes from simply worrying about stuff. I spend my time walking between destinations worrying about an assignment I have to finish, what another person thinks about me, how acceptable my appearance is, analyzing social interactions I had earlier, etc. Then sometimes I wake up from that dreamworld and realize that it all that anxiety comes from within me. Nothing real is causing me to suffer that anxiety, it’s just me, and I can choose to ignore it.

I’ve undertaken a renewal of my prayer life recently, taking this idea into account. I’m trying to stop analyzing every situation and issue in my life in terms of what hidden meaning God put into it, that I have to figure out. All of that analyzing caused me to make God more into a projection of myself rather than viewing him as he is.
40.png
AntiTheist:
The point of meditation isn’t to achieve mental fireworks, and it isn’t to change anything about your life. It’s hard for people to get that through their heads, especially here in the West. People think that they’re supposed to meditate to get “results,” to become “better” people or to not get so angry or to solve this problem or that problem. But they’re wrong. “Problems” of all sorts are stories that your mind tells you. They’re part of the mental model you construct to guide you through life. Meditation is the act of letting go of all of those stories, just for a little while. That is the result of meditation – sitting quietly and experiencing the moment – and it is a marvelous result.
Well, you ARE trying to change something about your life. You’re trying to spend less of it in the dreamworld of your mind and more of it in reality.

I agree that meditation shouldn’t be done as a search for a transcendental, supernatural experience. That makes if more likely that any supernatural experience you do have is your own doing.

Jesus taught us to not worry pointlessly, you know:
“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?
“And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you—you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.
I can’t even make my own heart beat. Why should I worry about my control over anything else?
 
And this is why an honest atheist ceases first to be either an atheist or imagine he is non-religious.

Welcome to the first step, AntiTheist.
Well, seeing that I’ve been practicing this particular version of Zen for nearly a decade now – with absolutely no changes to my conclusion that there are no gods – I’m not sure what “first step” you think my post designates.

For what it’s worth, I’ve discovered through meditation that morality and religious narratives – all of them – are pernicious thought patterns that interfere with a person’s ability to see the world clearly. So, in addition to my objections to religions on the grounds that they are forces for negativity in the world (and that the tangible benefits they provide can all be achieved through secular means), I also object to it on these psychological grounds.

I think that looking at the world through the lens of the belief that supernatural big brothers are guarding you is just another form of confusion. I say this not with the intent of offending anyone – I’m trying to explain what I’ve discovered in as plain language as I can.
Pax Christi from a former (and I dare say, much better) anti-Theist.
Tim
I doubt you were better. And again I say this not to be mean, but on the basis of evidence: you evidently weren’t very good at it if you were eventually convinced of Theism by what I can only conclude is a bad argument or a bad reason.
 
Response Part 1 of 2:
I agree that we live too much time in the world of our thoughts. I’ve realized over the past few years that most of my unhappiness in life comes from simply worrying about stuff. I spend my time walking between destinations worrying about an assignment I have to finish, what another person thinks about me, how acceptable my appearance is, analyzing social interactions I had earlier, etc. Then sometimes I wake up from that dreamworld and realize that it all that anxiety comes from within me. Nothing real is causing me to suffer that anxiety, it’s just me, and I can choose to ignore it.
Very well put. Another way to think of it is that “problems” are just our spin on stuff, not the stuff itself.

For example, take worrying about a school assignment. The act of writing an essay for school is – objectively speaking – no different than writing an entry in your journal and then polishing it up a bit so that it sounds good. The “problem” only arises when we start bringing other things to it in our mind, and then suddenly it becomes completely different – but it hasn’t changed…we’ve changed.

The way to correctly view the situation is to see the assignment for what it is, to see the false things we impose on it for what they are, to see the emotions of anxiety or worry rise in us – to watch all of this and to remain in the present moment, where all of this is happening.
I’ve undertaken a renewal of my prayer life recently, taking this idea into account. I’m trying to stop analyzing every situation and issue in my life in terms of what hidden meaning God put into it, that I have to figure out. All of that analyzing caused me to make God more into a projection of myself rather than viewing him as he is.
Yes. This is an excellent observation, one that I alluded to in the “Is religion egocentric?” thread.

The more you try to create a narrative to fit the events of your life (“Everything happens for a reason…so let me invent a reason for everything and tell myself a story about it…”), the more you’re going to get lost in the motion of your mind.

The more often you’re able to bring your mind to the awareness of what is in the Now, the easier it will be to see through stories like that (and ultimately, to address that other poster above, “religion” in its Western forms is one gigantic story of the mind).
Well, you ARE trying to change something about your life. You’re trying to spend less of it in the dreamworld of your mind and more of it in reality.
Yes and no. You can’t practice with the mindest that “This is going to ground me more in reality! I can’t wait to see how better I’ll be!” because that’s just another story. You’re giving yourself another mental image to hold onto instead of looking the present moment in the eye.

The practice has to be done for its own sake, at least while you’re doing it. And that, by the way, is the secret to life: everything you do ultimately has to be done for its own sake because there is nothing else than this moment.

There’s a line in one of the Buddhist sutras whose name is escaping me right now that says, roughly paraphrasing, that we cannot grasp the future, we cannot grasp the past, we cannot grasp the present (i.e. if you try to point to “the present,” it’s already passed by the time you point to it). Ultimately, if you really feel dwell in the present moment, there is no time, there is no story or narrative – there’s only whatever it is that you’re currently doing. So you do it for its own sake.
I agree that meditation shouldn’t be done as a search for a transcendental, supernatural experience. That makes if more likely that any supernatural experience you do have is your own doing.
Yep.
 
Response Part 2 of 2:
Jesus taught us to not worry pointlessly, you know
I do. You will, of course, find similar sentiments in the teachings of almost all religions – which is not terribly surprising because what I describe in my OP is a universal human problem (since evolution built us in a way that creates these problems and unhappiness), so we would expect that every single culture and school of thought would address the underlying problem more or less in similar ways.

The problem, of course, is that most schools of thought encourage students to swap one set of mental patterns for another – for example, like you were saying earlier, “find God’s hidden meaning in your life!” or “discover God’s will and follow it!” or “follow the example of this legendary figure!”

There’s another thread on here where I say explicitly that for most people “God” and “religion” become new objects of desire, fundamentally – that is, in the pattern of behavior it represents – no different than trying to be happy by seeking after material things or abstract ideas like being “cool.”

It’s all based around this flawed idea that something’s broken at the level of the individual and that you have to try to become something different in order to become happy. You don’t: that’s the illusion and that’s the psychological danger of religion in many of its forms – it puts a story between you and the reality of you in the Moment.

Meditation chips away at these tendencies in the human mind, and you will eventually find – if you are honest with yourself – that all of these stories are at best superfluous and at worst misleading traps that you are setting for yourself.
I can’t even make my own heart beat. Why should I worry about my control over anything else?
Of course, this isn’t to say that you have as little control over everything in your life as you do over your heartbeat – you have lots of control over tons of things, thanks in part to the technological advances our species has made. The key, as you say, is not to let your control or lack of control worry you (or, more precisely, to become more aware of how you worry so that the tendency will have less hold over you).

So many people worry about decisions like what they should do with their lives how they should spend their time what kind of person they should act like – those are all things that we have a great deal of control over. But the worry comes entirely from the “shoulds” in that sentence. The question “What should I do with my life?” carries with it the implication that there is something you “should” be doing, some right answer to the question and – thus – a distinct possibility that you’re going to screw it up.

That’s where anxiety comes from. Meditation teachs you to let go of the “shoulds.” How should you spend your time? How do you want to spend your time when you get rid of all those stories in your head that are telling you that you need to do X, Y, or Z to be a “good” person?

Meditation is about you just being you for a little while and, with applied effort, you’ll continue to be you as you go forth into life.

Thanks for your post. It was insightful, interesting, and generated some good thoughts in me. Let’s have more of that around here.
 
The more you try to create a narrative to fit the events of your life (“Everything happens for a reason…so let me invent a reason for everything and tell myself a story about it…”), the more you’re going to get lost in the motion of your mind.
That’s true. I had a bit of a faith crisis recently that involved my inability to tell the difference between my own self-created narrative/thoughts and my experience of God. I felt like my experience of God was just like a person who believes in horoscopes. The person subconsciously analyzes reality in such a way as to make the horoscope true. I was focusing on my own feelings and thoughts whenever I engaged in a spiritual activity, and those essentially became my God.

The other half of the crisis was that everyone else seemed be the same way. People seem to selectively choose an aspect of God to fit whatever situation they’re in, so that God means anything to anyone at anytime, but almost nothing overall. And the fact of the matter is, no one actually knows objectively that God actually did act in that way or that such-and-such happened for so-and-so reason. Catholics believe that public revelation ended with the death of the apostles, and I think that private revelation/interpretation is just too subjective to put a lot of weight on.

I have now resolved to stop trying to figure out everything in terms of a divine plan. Not because I don’t think there is one, but because when I try to figure it out it just becomes my own projection. I am only going to seek the kingdom of God by following his commandments.

Psalm 131
My heart is not proud, LORD,
my eyes are not haughty;
I do not concern myself with great matters
or things too wonderful for me.
But I have calmed and quieted myself,
I am like a weaned child with its mother;
like a weaned child I am content.

Israel, put your hope in the LORD
both now and forevermore.
40.png
AntiTheist:
I do. You will, of course, find similar sentiments in the teachings of almost all religions – which is not terribly surprising because what I describe in my OP is a universal human problem (since evolution built us in a way that creates these problems and unhappiness), so we would expect that every single culture and school of thought would address the underlying problem more or less in similar ways.
I realized after reading through the Old Testament that much of Jesus’ teachings were not new. He was a Jew, and he took most of what he taught from the Hebrew scriptures. Obviously, it’s not as though no one ever thought “Love thy neighbor” was a good maxim before Jesus came along. (What is special about Jesus is who he is.)

You’re explaining these problems using evolution. I agree that a lot of our human problems have a natural basis, and understanding them as such offers much insight. (The “fire alarm” instinct for example. It makes survival sense to react to a threat alarm even if there’s a low chance it’s real, because the personal cost if it is real is very high.)
40.png
AntiTheist:
So many people worry about decisions like what they should do with their lives how they should spend their time what kind of person they should act like – those are all things that we have a great deal of control over. But the worry comes entirely from the “shoulds” in that sentence. The question “What should I do with my life?” carries with it the implication that there is something you “should” be doing, some right answer to the question and – thus – a distinct possibility that you’re going to screw it up.

That’s where anxiety comes from. Meditation teachs you to let go of the “shoulds.” How should you spend your time? How do you want to spend your time when you get rid of all those stories in your head that are telling you that you need to do X, Y, or Z to be a “good” person?
I can understand that the removal of any “shoulds” from your life would feel liberating. But I can’t shirk off my sense of personal responsibility. I believe that I DO have a duty to act a certain way. Do you?
 
People seem to selectively choose an aspect of God to fit whatever situation they’re in, so that God means anything to anyone at anytime, but almost nothing overall.
Well, obviously, I agree with you here. “God” is often a person’s word for their self-image projected onto the cosmos.
I have now resolved to stop trying to figure out everything in terms of a divine plan. Not because I don’t think there is one, but because when I try to figure it out it just becomes my own projection.
This is all well and good, but as a serious question – and I mean no disrespect by this – what exactly is the practical difference between a divine plan that you can’t know and a divine plan that doesn’t exist at all?

You might say that believing in a divine plan makes you feel better, and if you say that, at least you’re being honest, but this is what I’m getting at when I say that all these narratives are at best superfluous and at worst mind traps. More below on the mind trap part.
I am only going to seek the kingdom of God by following his commandments.
In terms of what I’ve been discussing in this thread, I think this is problematic, for reasons I will discuss below.
I can understand that the removal of any “shoulds” from your life would feel liberating. But I can’t shirk off my sense of personal responsibility. I believe that I DO have a duty to act a certain way. Do you?
Depends on what you mean. Obviously, social obligations exist, but they’re not absolute in the sense that I usually take “duty” to mean.

Let me explain. All “should” statements have an unspoken “if” clause associated with them. When I say, “You should not touch a hot stove,” I do so with the unspoken assumption “if you do not want to be burned.” If you don’t care about being burned, you’re free to touch a hot stove all you want. In that particular example, of course, almost all people don’t want to burn themselves.

It gets significantly more complicated when you turn to situations involving less universal desires. For example, it’s one thing to think, “I want to further my career, and I know it would be good for my career to go to the office party, even though I know won’t really totally enjoy it.” It’s another thing entirely to think, “Well, I have to be a good employee, and good employees go to company functions. I have to do my duty!”

In the first frame of reference, you are thinking of yourself as a free individual willingly accepting social obligations as a means towards a goal that you have. You’re looking at reality as it is. In the second frame of reference, you’re casting yourself as a victim to whom the obligations of life are a giant chore. The difference is vast.

There’s nothing “inherently good” about going to a company event, and the idea that “good employees should do it” is one of those mind traps that I spoke of earlier. If you talk yourself into doing something just because you think it’s something you “should” do – without recognizing that there might be very good reasons that you want to do it – you’re going to be miserable. That’s how people talk themselves into living lives that they are unhappy with.

That’s all pretty easy to see when it’s something as silly as a company party, but the same applies just as much to all moral statements. It’s only a small jump to get to “Well, there’s a divine plan, and there’s a god who has such-and-such demands of me, and a good person obeys those demands, so….”

That’s exactly what I mean by “mind trap.” You’re telling yourself a story that you have a “duty” to act in a certain way when, in fact, no such duty exists, except in your mind.
 
Well, obviously, I agree with you here. “God” is often a person’s word for their self-image projected onto the cosmos.
Indeed. One of my favorite books is Spiritual Passages: The Psychology of Spiritual Development by Benedict Groeschel. In one section he talks about the challenge in Christian spirituality presented by our tendency to identify Christ with the divine image we perceive in ourselves. I quote:
We all tend to have our own Christ. A flick of the radio dial on Sunday morning will demonstrate how many “Christs” there are among sincere Christians. As we have seen, the spiritually awakened of all religions are aware in some way of this inner image. No doubt this is a reflection of the universal creative and salvific will of God. But it is too easy to say that this image is Christ. Surely it is related to Christ and to our status as children of God which He came to establish and share. But identifying Christ with our own human experience is an oversimplification that omits essential areas of the spirituality of redemption…
The tendency to identify completely this inner personal image with Christ also militates against the recognition of the need for the Church, which, as the existential Christian community, is the mystical presence of Christ in the world…
In this regard, [we] should ask [ourselves] two questions: How much of my image of Christ is merely a projection of what I would like? Second, is my conception of Christ consistently growing and is it fed by the Scriptures and sacred tradition?..
I got so wrapped up in my own thoughts and feelings about God that they became God for me. The practice of clearing our heads as you described in Zen meditation, helps me to avoid that. I must realize that God isn’t personally revealing stuff to me all the time, and I am not meant to try and interpret and control every little thing that goes on in my life.

And by the way, this is all another reason why Protestantism, or sola scriptura, is logically unsustainable. When each individual interprets the Bible for himself, all you get is thousands of different self-images of God.
40.png
AntiTheist:
This is all well and good, but as a serious question – and I mean no disrespect by this – what exactly is the practical difference between a divine plan that you can’t know and a divine plan that doesn’t exist at all?
I don’t think God’s plan is unknowable. I think that when I approach God’s plan for my life in terms of analyzing everyday events, it’s an expression of my anxiety and my desire to make sure everything that happens in my life is comfortable for me. We can certainly know our vocations, and the basic plan for every person’s life is to know, love, and serve God. But interpreting every event’s specific relation to the divine plan is out of our domain, and easily descends into self-fulfilling superstition.
40.png
AntiTheist:
You’re looking at reality as it is. In the second frame of reference, you’re casting yourself as a victim to whom the obligations of life are a giant chore. The difference is vast.

There’s nothing “inherently good” about going to a company event, and the idea that “good employees should do it” is one of those mind traps that I spoke of earlier. If you talk yourself into doing something just because you think it’s something you “should” do – without recognizing that there might be very good reasons that you want to do it – you’re going to be miserable. That’s how people talk themselves into living lives that they are unhappy with.

That’s all pretty easy to see when it’s something as silly as a company party, but the same applies just as much to all moral statements. It’s only a small jump to get to “Well, there’s a divine plan, and there’s a god who has such-and-such demands of me, and a good person obeys those demands, so….”

That’s exactly what I mean by “mind trap.” You’re telling yourself a story that you have a “duty” to act in a certain way when, in fact, no such duty exists, except in your mind.
I think what you view as “existing only in your mind”, Christianity views as free will. I can ignore any sense of duty because I am free to do so; it’s as if it’s not there (for the most part). I can’t ignore physical reality because I have no free will to disobey gravity or the hardness of a brick wall.
 
I think what you view as “existing only in your mind”, Christianity views as free will. I can ignore any sense of duty because I am free to do so; it’s as if it’s not there (for the most part). I can’t ignore physical reality because I have no free will to disobey gravity or the hardness of a brick wall.
Well, what I’m saying is that “duty” in the sense you mean it here isn’t there. It exists in the same sense as your other mental patterns exist – something you use to help you navigate reality, but not real outside of you.

Now you might have lots of good reasons for wanting to be kind to someone or attend a party or pitch in and help out around the house – even if you know you won’t love every second of it – but there’s a big difference between looking objectively at the situation and understanding why it is that you want to do X and thinking that there’s some magical “duty” compelling you to act.

One approach is realistic and increases your awareness of reality. The other turns you into a passive robot who obeys the “duty” that your mind has cooked up.

It’s all about training your mind to see more and more clearly.

Ranklyfrank:
Kudos, AntiTheist! You are doing exemplary work. Thank you.
Thanks very much. I’m glad everyone is enjoying my post.
 
We can also say that “duty” is one of those wonderful words in English that allows us to express shades of meaning. Usually we do things more out of a sense of commonality with another or others, as we feel that we are like them or they are our “we” that we belong to. “Duty” is a shade of that which involves hierarchy and a bigger picture either through command or moral necessity. But even moral necessity boils down to a sense or feeling (they are different) of commonality.

“Duty” might also have a flavor of unwillingness or sacrifice. But usually, even under what seems extreme altruism to onlookers, we do things because they fit our perception, conscious or not, that that “other” is essentially like, or is, me. Unconditional Love is making no distinction between yourself and another. That means when it is time to act you are not thinking of dogmas or precepts or relative values, you act as if what’s happening to the other is happening to you in another body. That’s because it is. Just most people haven’t got to where they can see that yet. 🙂
 
“Duty” might also have a flavor of unwillingness or sacrifice. But usually, even under what seems extreme altruism to onlookers, we do things because they fit our perception, conscious or not, that that “other” is essentially like, or is, me.
I think that even what seems like altruism to others is essentially an expression of what we want to do. Someone who volunteers in a soup kitchen, for example, generally enjoys the work. Maybe he has this vague sense that he “is” the other person, but I would consider that to be nothing more than another distracting narrative.

What I’m talking about are cases where “duty” interferes with true desire. For example, if you absolutely loathe soup kitchens and yet you decide to work there because you feel that you have some sort of duty or obligation to do so, you’re going to be miserable.
That means when it is time to act you are not thinking of dogmas or precepts or relative values, you act as if what’s happening to the other is happening to you in another body. That’s because it is. Just most people haven’t got to where they can see that yet. 🙂
I disagree with your implication that you “are” other people – this is nothing more than flowery, mystical claptrap that Zen meditation should be cutting through.

What you seem to be talking about is empathy, which is definitely real – scientists have studied, for example, the ways that the parts of the brain that generate the feeling of pain often trigger a little when you see someone undergoing pain. And that might be a reason to help others – you want to end their suffering so that you don’t have to experience a kind of imaginative, sympathetic suffering.

But that’s totally and completely different from a metaphysical claim that you actually are the other person, which you’re not. Remember, we’re trying to see reality clearly here and figure out what’s actually going on. Sitting around and chanting, “All is one” may make you feel good, but it’s not a terribly clear way to see reality.
 
I think that even what seems like altruism to others is essentially an expression of what we want to do. Someone who volunteers in a soup kitchen, for example, generally enjoys the work. Maybe he has this vague sense that he “is” the other person, but I would consider that to be nothing more than another distracting narrative.

What I’m talking about are cases where “duty” interferes with true desire. For example, if you absolutely loathe soup kitchens and yet you decide to work there because you feel that you have some sort of duty or obligation to do so, you’re going to be miserable.

I disagree with your implication that you “are” other people – this is nothing more than flowery, mystical claptrap that Zen meditation should be cutting through.

What you seem to be talking about is empathy, which is definitely real – scientists have studied, for example, the ways that the parts of the brain that generate the feeling of pain often trigger a little when you see someone undergoing pain. And that might be a reason to help others – you want to end their suffering so that you don’t have to experience a kind of imaginative, sympathetic suffering.

But that’s totally and completely different from a metaphysical claim that you actually are the other person, which you’re not. Remember, we’re trying to see reality clearly here and figure out what’s actually going on. Sitting around and chanting, “All is one” may make you feel good, but it’s not a terribly clear way to see reality.
I appreciate your analysis and agree with it. However, I don’t foolishly think that I’m someone else, personally. That, of course, is impossible. I’m referring to the “contents” 😉 of mu. So I might more correctly have stated “… happening to “you” as another body” as we have “nothing” in common. Knowing that, you still drink beer, change the kid’s diapers, and smooch the wife. And maybe work at a soup kitchen for nothing.
 
Nice post AntiTheist. There are so many different meditation techniques. You can spend many years trying them all. In my faith, you spend a lot of time in meditation. Breath centered meditation seems to work well for beginners, but I still use that to start each day. Another good start is alternate nostril breathing, which is a form of pranayama. It helps calm your mind down and raises your energy levels so you can fight off sleep later in your meditation. Sleep is the big enemy of meditation. Time of day is another big consideration. Around 4am is the very best time for most people, or as early as you can after that. Dusk is another good time. If you can’t do those, then whatever time you do, it’s said to be best if you do it about the same time each day. It creates a pattern.

Your friend
Sufjon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top