‘Fire Tucker Carlson’: Fox News Host Condemned for Comments on Deadly Shooting of Kenosha Protesters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, he is just an overpaid video blogger.

Maybe a pay cut is in order though.
 
But ultimately his status will depend on the Advertisers on his time slot.
 
Tucker Carlson’s show is him sharing his opinion. It’s not supposed to be a news broadcast. Our opinions of his opinion may vary, but as long as he has his platform you can’t blame him for the act of sharing his opinion.

His actual opinion, however, is a fair target.
 
Last edited:
To be fair it’s a lawless wasteland at this point and there’s photographic evidence, now, that one of the dudes walking up to him while he was on the ground was carrying a weapon. He had right to fear for his life. . . .
 
Last edited:
Well, whatever about the specifics, that these demonstrations have a dangerous component where people can be killed is very much part of the equation. Now it has happened.

BLM, it’s a big money making organization and I don’t know if they care who gets hurt, the same thing for Marxists. Some Marxists that is. They see some hurt or death as part of their movement.
 
All Marxists, if they actually follow their ideology involves a violent revolution of the proletariate. Social Democrats are the lefties that want revolution by the ballot not the bullet
 
Baho said:
To be fair it’s a lawless wasteland at this point and there’s photographic evidence, now, that one of the dudes walking up to him while he was on the ground was carrying a weapon.
Click to expand...
This is correct, what a tragedy but Rittenhouse may well have a good case for self-defense, I saw that part of the video.
 
It started years ago when we decided that it was okay to ‘punch a Nazi’. The moment you deem any idea, no matter how repulsive it is, worthy of attacking someone over you make all ideas vulnerable to the same fate, when the mob decides it’s time.
 
That and how long to marxists and anarkiddies expect to ruin communities without encountering resistance? I pray for the souls that died, but they chased a 17- year old. What is a teenager going to do with his rifle when a rioter points a pistol at him?
 
Perhaps part of the problem was that there was a 17 year old with a gun? He was breaking the law by having the gun. Why no outrage at that law being broken?
 
illegal for a 17 year old. And, he didn’t have to go “into a mob of dangerous thugs”, he chos to to that, even crossed states line to do so.

It seems as though his illegal actions are not only acceptable to you but maybe even considered good. He literally killed 2 people.

Yet, others throwing things are worse? I do not understand.

I think the actions of both groups are illegal and bad. Just saying I take the destruction of property over murder any day.
 
Last edited:
Anonkun said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Some people who call for law and order do not have respect for either.
Click to expand...
The point of law and order is to have a peaceful society. A gun held by a responsible young man is more in the spirit of law and order than a bunch of criminals trying to burn down a city.
Click to expand...
Once you allow people to decide for themselves what is in the “spirit of the law”, you have abandoned law and order.
 
It was perfectly legal for him to have a firearm. His grandparents have a business in Kenosha that he felt called to help protect. He wasn’t breaking any law.

It’s notable though you did not ask about what laws the “protestors” were breaking. Why are you not outraged about the laws they were breaking?
 
Rittenhouse He was allowed violence because he was protecting law and order?

Isn’t that essentially what the “thugs” were doing to? The saw an injustice (shooting of Jacob Blake) and used the means they thought necessarry to address it?

The protestors want law and order too.
 
I did say I was against the violence of the protesters.
 
Last edited:
cloistered said:
illegal for a 17 year old. And, he didn’t have to go “into a mob of dangerous thugs”, he chos to to that, even crossed states line to do so.

It seems as though his illegal actions are not only acceptable to you but maybe even considered good. He literally killed 2 people.

Yet, others throwing things are worse? I do not understand.

I think the actions of both groups are illegal and bad. Just saying I take the destruction of property over murder any day.
Click to expand...
He went to try to help his grandparents and protect their business. His actions were not illegal, self defense is not an illegal action. The video clearly shows he was being attacked, one of them pointing a gun right at him while he was on the ground. In your mind it was legal for the “protestor” to have and point a gun at someone but it was illegal for the one on the ground to try to protect himself by shooting first?

There wasn’t a murder, there was self defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top