I agree with the above. I’ve always been chaste, though single, and if I do get married it will be after menopause, and that’s they way it was meant to be, otherwise I’d already be married. There is no one blueprint for life.I actually found it somewhat offensive. He seems to imply that all young people have sex, so it is best to get married young. As a 44 year old who has never married and remained chase, I feel as if he has totally knocked me off the map. I am doing God’s will just the same as he is, so why has my option been made to not exist. If it is God’s will for me to marry after my child bearing years, that is no sin on my part.
I just felt there was an underlying tone that everyone is an animal and that is not true. A lot of people have self control
Not to mention time changes everyone and in 15 years from now, he might still be happy but he will still potential have a different opinion. After all, how many people look back 20 years and still see things the same way?
Angie
I am glad to see someone agrees, I was scared I would get blasted. I also found it a bit sick how he said he could use his sexuality optimally. If two people marry, it is a spiritual union and if they are past their child bearing years, it is not less optimalI agree with the above. I’ve always been chaste, though single, and if I do get married it will be after menopause, and that’s they way it was meant to be, otherwise I’d already be married. There is no one blueprint for life.
- We are getting to enjoy our sexual primes together in a healthy, fulfilling, and constructive way.
Young people have sex drives. This is a great thing! So it’s sad that our culture is basically designed to ensure one’s sexuality is frustrating, empty, and/or destructive.
This strongly reminds me of arguments against celibacy.Education extends far past physical maturity, making it practically difficult for people to make normal use of their sexuality by getting married and having kids. But people still have sex drives, so they fornicate, degrading themselves and using others. Despite people’s best contraceptive efforts, sometimes the procreative act (surprise!) still procreates, and women get stuck raising a child alone or with someone they don’t really love, or lose hope and decide the best course of action is to kill their child.
A lot of people have self control? Truth matters - opinions don’t.I actually found it somewhat offensive. He seems to imply that all young people have sex, so it is best to get married young. As a 44 year old who has never married and remained chase, I feel as if he has totally knocked me off the map. I am doing God’s will just the same as he is, so why has my option been made to not exist. If it is God’s will for me to marry after my child bearing years, that is no sin on my part.
I just felt there was an underlying tone that everyone is an animal and that is not true. A lot of people have self control
Not to mention time changes everyone and in 15 years from now, he might still be happy but he will still potential have a different opinion. After all, how many people look back 20 years and still see things the same way?
Angie
You may well still get blasted. By me…I am glad to see someone agrees, I was scared I would get blasted.
Again, you’re jumping to conclusions that I don’t think are warranted. He said “We are getting to enjoy our sexual primes together in a healthy, fulfilling, and constructive way”. He does not use the term “optimally”, though you may feel it is implied, but again the comparison is agains those who postpone marriage/family and instead engage in fornication and contraception.I also found it a bit sick how he said he could use his sexuality optimally. If two people marry, it is a spiritual union and if they are past their child bearing years, it is not less optimal
Actually average age of marriage was highly variable depending on when, where and if it was arranged by parents (in which case it tended younger) or a love marriage (where it tended old to ensure they had the financial means to support themselves). Additionally birth order mattered especially for men (eldest son was bound to get most or all of the inheritance so they could be more sure about it).I just think he is saying that if you are planning on marriage and kids, doing it when you’re young is great. That’s not such a revolutionary message. That has actually been the most common experience for centuries. Some of us didn’t get married until later, or not at all. That’s all right. But if you plan on marriage and plan on a family, the twenties are a good time to begin.
Indeed. This doesn’t exactly work for those without serious financial and social assistance and that’s hard to find in the modern day. In times past, even if folks didn’t have financial help, they generally had plenty of social and familial help.Maybe I missed it, but I didn’t see anywhere in the article about how they actually did this financially. No mention of student loans- were their parents paying for college? How do you work enough, finish senior year, and have a baby all at once? They must have had an incredible support system, both financially and in terms of childcare.
I’m glad this worked out for them, but I think the subtitle that suggests “why you should consider being a social rebel” by starting a family before graduating college isn’t realistic for a lot of people. I don’t know many 21 year olds entering their senior year of college who are financially self-sufficient enough to start a family.
I think there needs to be some element of security before folks are ready to get married. It takes more than the couple and God to get through, you know? It takes the help of a community or at least family. Or cash, and lots of it.My wife was 21 when we married, but I was 30, so I guess we straddled the gap. But this business of trying to make sure all the finances are in order before marriage is a foreign concept to me, and I imagine to many others of previous generations. If we all had to get our finances in order first, nobody would get married. We were both working, but not making much. Six months into the marriage I lost my job. I got another one, and then a month later she had a serious and sudden medical emergency and was in the hospital for 30 days. We had no medical insurance. But we survived together. The wedding vows promise richer and poorer, sickness and health. We can’t foresee the future, but we can live it together.
I’m not sure how long ago you were married, but today it is very difficult to find a decent paying job without a college education, and rather difficult even when you have one. By decent paying job, I mean one that allows you to afford rent or a mortgage and food, as well as pay the electricity and other bills, I’m not talking about anything extra. Rent alone in my state is at least $1200-1400 per month, and that’s for a small place. And if someone without medical insurance has an emergency these days, they could very quickly become destitute. I don’t think people need to entirely have their finances “in order”, but they do need to make enough to live on.My wife was 21 when we married, but I was 30, so I guess we straddled the gap. But this business of trying to make sure all the finances are in order before marriage is a foreign concept to me, and I imagine to many others of previous generations. If we all had to get our finances in order first, nobody would get married. We were both working, but not making much. Six months into the marriage I lost my job. I got another one, and then a month later she had a serious and sudden medical emergency and was in the hospital for 30 days. We had no medical insurance. But we survived together. The wedding vows promise richer and poorer, sickness and health. We can’t foresee the future, but we can live it together.
I was 20 when I married, husband was 21. I finished my senior year of college with a baby while he worked full time. Yes, we did it on our own, without financial help from either set of parents. I paid for college on my own. We went on to have 8 more children. We owned our first home at 27/28.Maybe I missed it, but I didn’t see anywhere in the article about how they actually did this financially. No mention of student loans- were their parents paying for college? How do you work enough, finish senior year, and have a baby all at once? They must have had an incredible support system, both financially and in terms of childcare.
I’m glad this worked out for them, but I think the subtitle that suggests “why you should consider being a social rebel” by starting a family before graduating college isn’t realistic for a lot of people. I don’t know many 21 year olds entering their senior year of college who are financially self-sufficient enough to start a family.
Your husband was working full time. In this article, both husband and wife were in their senior year of college.I was 20 when I married, husband was 21. I finished my senior year of college with a baby while he worked full time. Yes, we did it on our own, without financial help from either set of parents. I paid for college on my own. We went on to have 8 more children. We owned our first home at 27/28.