This is a different claim than what Martha claimed, unless you are also claiming to be an Arab. If you mean the indigenous languages of Australia, there are indeed many (though less and less everyday, unfortunately; Australian languages are among the least documented, too), and it is highly unlikely that the Bible or any other non-indigenous book would be available in every language, to say nothing of the irrelevance of this idea as most of the languages remain unwritten. For many languages, including Australian indigenous languages, portions of the Bible have been translated, even if the whole thing has not. I don’t know a whole lot about Bible translation issues, but out of curiosity I went looking for some information and found
this page that lists Bible translations for the entire world. I would take their information with a grain of salt, however; though it is interesting to look at, I question what they mean by “The Bible” when they say, for instance, that the Bible was first published in Arabic 1671. This is demonstrably false, as that is the first Arabic Bible published in Rome, while the Mt. Sinai Arabic codex (151), the first Arabic New Testament, is dated 867. I personally don’t know of any earlier than this, but that matters little, as most the Christians of the Near East had yet to switch from their native Syriac or other languages to Arabic until well after that (for the Maronites in particular, as late as the 13th to 16th centuries, depending on who you believe), so Arabic Bible translations would not have been as easily available or useful during the earliest days of Islam (remember, for example, the pact of Umar, wherein Christians were not allowed to adopt the Arab ways or convert anyone to Christianity?).