U
upant
Guest
It was an appropriate response to the OP and in fact trueWhy have you introduced a political party into the discussion? Why not just address the points made by the OP?
It was an appropriate response to the OP and in fact trueWhy have you introduced a political party into the discussion? Why not just address the points made by the OP?
Yes indeed. Socialists hold a monopoly in virtue, didnt you know that?Are you really so arrogant that you think that people who disagree with you on how to best serve the poor must have cold hearts and evil intentions?
Have you ever had to rely solely on the personal charity of others for your basic human needs? If so, how was that for you? Did you have to do it long term, due to being disabled?Instead of relying on the government to help the poor while also using our money to kill people, whats wrong with personal charity-ACTUAL charity from the heart instead of through government force?
The post’s substance could have been addressed rather than drawing inferences. One you label positions or issues with a political party, the debate degenerates.The poster you cite appears to be addressing the fact that the OP is clearly attacking Republicans, so it is in fact the OP who brought up a political party even if not mentioning the name. Why should the response not be allowed to mention one?
So it would seem both posters earn my disapproval for politicizing.They went on a huuuuge political rant, explicitly talking about Republicans and Biden.
Actually, in other countries, systems that ensure no person cannot access healthcare due to lack of financial resources are widely embraced as a good thing.Since universal healthcare is to force workers to care for others,
A first step might be to acknowledge that an abortion may be a medical procedure, but it’s not healthcare.by ridding of the option to abort children.
You’d need to question many more things than that to understand the death rate trend. Age of drivers, skill of drivers, condition of the roads, level of policing, social attitudes to drink/drug driving, condition of public transport alternatives, etc etc.If death in car accident were on the rise, I would question how effect seat belt are working.
It’s a wonderful idea, but it tends not to deliver (sufficiently).Instead of relying on the government to help the poor while also using our money to kill people, whats wrong with personal charity-ACTUAL charity from the heart instead of through government force?
Yet here you come using Christianity to justify you reasons that we need an all powerful central government.Raised Catholic. Devout.
But I am always amazed at how people(republican’s) tie religion into politics and use the former to justify the latter. It’s so sad. Some politician(republicans) waves a Bible, says public prayer, and they declare him a “Man of God.” But I say he/she is a Pharisee.
They(republicans) say clothe the naked, feed the poor, take care of the sick, yet they(republicans) scream “COMMUNISM!” or “SOCIALISM!” when people try to introduce univ. healthcare and other social assistance programs. The(republicans) motto seems to be, “Help others, but not at my expense.”
They(republicans) don’t have the sense of doing the right things at the right times. Now is the time to care for one another, obey the government, and wear masks. If you point to a biblical passage about obeying the law of the land, these pharisees(republicans) immediately try to find a counter-passage to oppose you. They(republicans) are Christians to the extent that they are not inconvenienced.
CHRISTIANITY/CATHOLICISM WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE EASY. They(republicans) need to get out of their comfort zone.
They(republicans) scream Pro-Life! Which I mostly do agree with by the way, yet oppose universal healthcare, directly contradicting their(republicans) cause. . . .
I am convinced that if it suits their(republicans) purposes, people will believe in the most outrageous things, as well as pervert biblical passages to justify themselves. And this forum serves as an enabler, enabling the wrong people. I am convinced that this post, although laden with common sense and observations without hurting people, will be swiftly taken down. . .
I am sorry to hear that. I thought that the US was an honest democracy?You will never see an honest national election again for the house, senate, or Presidency.
I imagine a “universal healthcare” schemes aims to ensure that everyone can access quality medical care regardless of their capacity to pay for it. Do your current programs ensure that?I’m not suggesting charity alone but why do we need universal healthcare as opposed to the programs we have now for the elderly and infirm?
I tend to believe the US people are smart enough to organize a voting system that delivers “true” results (though the vagaries of non-compulsory voting remain).We have been headed in this direction for decades You will never see an honest national election again for the house, senate, or Presidency. After the next four years there will be a reason created for mail in ballots.
I have read most of Bastiat writings several times.“Idealism is the noble toga that political gentlemen drape over their will to power.”
~ Aldous Huxley
“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.”
~ Albert Camus
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all.”
― Frederic Bastiat
“The State, both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social… The superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism, Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and publicists; the serious student sees in them only one root-idea of a complete conversion of social power into State power.”
― Albert Jay Nock
Too many of my posts were flagged and deleted for (IMHO) no good reason.even asking the question provokes flagging.
And many of the ad hominem attacks were left standing.The moderation has been very poor on this site