A message from the “resistance” in the WH

[LeafByNiggle]

Can you not hear yourself. YOU offer maybes and innuendo. No proof other than well NYT is a respected news source. That’s it. If this news story was against your narrative there is no way you would arguing that it is believable or credible.

I didn’t say it was against the narrative. I just said I can’t be sure it was a wise thing to do to offer the op ed to the NYT. That alone does not make me question that the person is real and the op ed is from that person.

 

[Imdaman]

It may be just rhetoric, but it has the potential to stir the fringes on each side to actions that would be undesirable to say the least. Where I live, threats have already been made.

The violent left is wanting a banner to rally around and create chaos and violence. It has been happening for several years now and is more pronounced since they did not get their way in the election

 

[Imdaman]

Imdaman:

Can you not hear yourself. YOU offer maybes and innuendo. No proof other than well NYT is a respected news source. That’s it. If this news story was against your narrative there is no way you would arguing that it is believable or credible.

I didn’t say it was against the narrative. I just said I can’t be sure it was a wise thing to do to offer the op ed to the NYT. That alone does not make me question that the person is real and the op ed is from that person.

Well ity should certainly make you question the credibility of this type of “Opinion piece” LIke I said to many things don’t ad up and the lack of any real eveidence to the truth should make one very wary of such a story!

 

[EricF]

Maybe, but here it isn’t the left making the threats. Far from it.

 

[Imdaman]

No? Well they have certainly been the ones rioting in the streets making violence on people and property for the last several years.

 

[Imdaman]

Imdaman:

Can you not hear yourself. YOU offer maybes and innuendo. No proof other than well NYT is a respected news source. That’s it. If this news story was against your narrative there is no way you would arguing that it is believable or credible.

I didn’t say it was against the narrative. I just said I can’t be sure it was a wise thing to do to offer the op ed to the NYT. That alone does not make me question that the person is real and the op ed is from that person.

Well in that case you should also agree that just because some letter shows up on the desk of a anti Trump journalist one should not just beleive it without actual evidence of its credibility. For all we know Yvette Felarca wrote the letter. By any means necessary, right!

 

[Dr_Meinheimer]

The “unnamed source” either doesn’t exist, is some clown with little actual influence who has a big opinion of himself (ergo the complete lack of actual details), or it is Lanny Davis.

 

[OraLabora]

How so? How does this prove their is chaos in the WH

Certainly proves there is chaos in his mind. If there isn’t in the White House, it certainly not due to the President.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

Imdaman:

Can you not hear yourself. YOU offer maybes and innuendo. No proof other than well NYT is a respected news source. That’s it. If this news story was against your narrative there is no way you would arguing that it is believable or credible.

I didn’t say it was against the narrative. I just said I can’t be sure it was a wise thing to do to offer the op ed to the NYT. That alone does not make me question that the person is real and the op ed is from that person.

Well in that case you should also agree that just because some letter shows up on the desk of a anti Trump journalist one should not just beleive it without actual evidence of its credibility. For all we know Yvette Felarca wrote the letter. By any means necessary, right!

I don’t think a letter just “showed up” on a desk claiming to be someone important. I think the person contacted the NYT personally and hand-delivered the op ed. The NYT knows who they are. They have seen him/her. They know the person’s position.

 

[ProVobis]

As long as it’s a mystery the story lives on.

 

[Annie]

And the Democrats are the racists, because their past (well-deserved) reputation.

The reputation of the NYT has gone downhill in recent years, deservedly so.

 

[Annie]

Let’s consider the evidence.

The letter is not all that well-written. It is not something I would expect from anyone with a job at the White House.

Second, there seems to be no purpose in writing it.

Third, there is nothing in there that hasn’t been a Democrat talking point.

There is nothing about the letter which would lead one to think it is real.

 

[Inisfallen]

Let’s consider the evidence.

The letter is not all that well-written. It is not something I would expect from anyone with a job at the White House.

Given that our president is not what you’d call a literary genius, I don’t expect much in the way of literary talent from the White House.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

Let’s consider the evidence.

The letter is not all that well-written. It is not something I would expect from anyone with a job at the White House.

It is better than anything Trump could have written, and he has a job there (supposedly)

There is nothing about the letter which would lead one to think it is real.

Other than the fact that the New York Times says it is real.

 

[ucfengr]

This could get awkward…

“People Are Totally Stunned”: Even Within the Times, the Deep Throat–esque Op-Ed Heard ’Round the World Dropped Jaws

James Bennet, the Times’s Opinion editor, discusses the origin of the Trump administration’s bewitching cry for help.

www.vanityfair.com

From the article:

Indeed, Times reporters who cover the White House now find themselves in the rather unorthodox and surely awkward position of trying to discern the identity of a source whose anonymity is being protected by another department of their own organization. “I’m obviously very concerned about preserving the anonymity of the writer,” Bennet told me, “but I understand reporters are doing their job.”

It would be ironic if the source guaranteed anonymity by the NYT editorial department is exposed by the NYT news department.

 

[EricF]

Even CNN is suggesting this op-ed letter is bovine excreta.

 

[Imdaman]

Even CNN is suggesting this op-ed letter is bovine excreta.

It is! what is the point other than to try and effect the midterms. NYT has a stake in the outcome for sure!

 

[Imdaman]

Imdaman:

How so? How does this prove their is chaos in the WH

Certainly proves there is chaos in his mind. If there isn’t in the White House, it certainly not due to the President.

Nothing you wrote here is true. It proves nothing! You see what you want. They are several explanations for all of it. You like your explanation because you think it makes Trump look inept. It is not necessarily so!

 

[Imdaman]

So all you have is insults and accusations nothing tangible. You should be ashamed of yourself!

 

[Imdaman]

Annie:

Let’s consider the evidence.

The letter is not all that well-written. It is not something I would expect from anyone with a job at the White House.

It is better than anything Trump could have written, and he has a job there (supposedly)

There is nothing about the letter which would lead one to think it is real.

Other than the fact that the New York Times says it is real.

Not really. You choose to believe a known NYT anti-trump journalist that wants to sell his column.