P
PaulinVA
Guest
It’s NPR, so hopefully people won’t get all upset about the source.
Who Is Most Vulnerable To COVID-19? And Other Questions Answered
…the overwhelming majority of people who are sick enough to be hospitalized in the U.S. have at least one underlying condition or disease. The top chronic conditions - high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes.
www.npr.org/2020/04/13/833010438/who-is-most-vulnerable-to-covid-19-and-other-questions-answered
I guess it depends what you think the conversation is.Articles with titles like this are very destructive and contribute zero to the conversation.
what is faked?fake
NPR was just talking about that earlier tonight, but they were blaming it on systemic racism rather than being a fat adult with diabetes, they insisted you shouldn’t blame the victimWho Is Most Vulnerable To COVID-19? And Other Questions Answered
Headlines from end of January to mid-February, largely in reaction to Trump closing air traffic from China.
Don’t confuse “conversation” with “narrative.”Donkey:![]()
I guess it depends what you think the conversation is.Articles with titles like this are very destructive and contribute zero to the conversation.
They destroy (or at least erode) any connection ‘the people’ might still have with reality and truth.If articles like this are “destructive”, what do they destroy? I think articles like this are very useful.
The estimated death count has continually been revised downwards due to a changing situation. Whatever is being done, it appears to be working.Just one example.
I thought New York ended up having MORE ventilators than they needed?? (And they ended up getting many to them too. Or at least made available.)
I could just as easily say that the situation has appeared to be getting because, with the increased data collection, the models are trained better and are producing more realistic results.The estimated death count has continually been revised downwards due to a changing situation. Whatever is being done, it appears to be working.
See above.The main promise was to tackle this health crisis in an effective manner and to minimize death. You can’t argue with the numbers.
I’m amazed how people of different political views look at statements such as this by the President.We were specifically told 15 cases. Soon to be zero.
Actually, the original estimates presumed social distancing, so the error didn’t come from not accounting for that. The error was that the models vastly overstated the number of deaths and hospitalizations.Cathoholic:![]()
The estimated death count has continually been revised downwards due to a changing situation. Whatever is being done, it appears to be working.Just one example.
I thought New York ended up having MORE ventilators than they needed?? (And they ended up getting many to them too. Or at least made available.)
The main promise was to tackle this health crisis in an effective manner and to minimize death. You can’t argue with the numbers.