No. We are made “worthy” as men, not as spirits, & that “worthiness” is nothing without the grace of Christ. Of themselves, our works are filthy rags, for they come from us who are unclean before God.
It is the spirit within us that is born of God; the flesh is born of flesh. The spirit was often called or compared to a seed in the parables of Christ.
*1 John 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. *
*Ga 5:19-23 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. *
Our spirit comes from God, and even now our spirit is worthy. We in our entirety are not worthy.
It’s “unfair” only in the sense that is not based on justice. It comes from grace instead - & grace is often paradoxical.
God can give eternal life to anyone He wants, whether they deserved it or not. By dieing on the cross, the Lord met His own requirement for the justification for the resurrection of whoever is resurrected to eternal Heaven. The death of Christ shows that God is completely fair and just since He sent His son to die on the cross to meet His own requirement.
Fair is fair. It isn’t right for one person to be punished for the sins of another and no amount of theological rhetoric can change that.
##If Christ is not our Glorious Substitute - who else is going to take our sins & our punishment ? It’s because we deserve to, but cannot, that we have a Redeemer Who can - & has. That may seem unfair, but it is God’s Righteousness in action, condemning our sin yet saving us: not for our sakes, but for the Glory of His Name & His Son. SA may not be the whole truth, but it is certainly part of it: otherwise, why is Christ typified by the substitionary sacrifices of the old dispensation & by the Servant of the LORD? The SotL in Isaiah 53 is in some sense a type of Christ - & he bears sins not his own. So why can his Greater Antitype not do so? Types are pale antuicipations of what they typify - Jesus is far more excellent than the Servant, for He is both Servant & Son
In Isaiah 53 the Messiah is wounded “because of our transgressions”, “because of our iniquities” and “with his stripes we were healed.” This does not say how the wounding of the Messiah causes us to be healed, but only that the wounding of the Messiah causes us to be healed.
No - the whole man sins, so the whole man must be saved; for the whole man is under the righteous judgement of God. If we are saved only in part, we are not saved as men at all, but as spirits. That is not what God created us (Gen. 1.26-28).
As far as God creating us in the flesh, there were only two people created in the flesh by God (Adam and Eve).
*John 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. *
After Adam and Eve, all flesh is born of flesh (except for Christ). It is the spirit within us that is born of God.
##IOW, we have an unBiblical anthropology, going hand-in-hand with an unBiblical doctrine of sin, & an unBiblical Christology as the source of both. We are fallen creatures, fallen in the entirety of our nature - so we are corrupted in our entire nature - so we deserve damnation, spirit as well as flesh. Which is why we desperately need a Saviour, One Who is sufficient to the greatness of our need. And this Saviour God Himself has provided for us (Romans 3.25) To Him be all the Glory !
Not unbiblical, but un-the-way-you-interpret-the-Bible-ical.