Z
Zatzat
Guest
May I ask why the creator of the universe would consider it a mortal sin worthy of eternal damnation, if one of his children ate a pulled pork sandwich on a Friday?
Please help me understand. Why would God approve of one his children eating a rich slice of cheese cake on a Friday, but not a slice of ham?Zatzat, the sin is not in the act itself but in the disobedience to God’s will. It is no different from eating the apple…
Thanks, that makes a lot more sense.Zat,
Two points.
The answer is partly in my post just above namely not putting things in between us and God.
The meat thing is I think more connected to the History of our Church. We’re in part connecting with, and following our brothers and sisters across time, when we abstain from meat, like they did.
You have a solid point too…replacing meat with cheese cake is not living in the spirit of detachment connected with fasting and abstaining. Abstain from both and smiling more that day might be a good approach.
Why would God approve of one of his children eating a rich slice of cheese cake and not the apple from the Tree of Knowledge?Please help me understand. Why would God approve of one his children eating a rich slice of cheese cake on a Friday, but not a slice of ham?
I really understand your approach…it was mine.Regardless of what some canonm lawyers and theologians may have said and as MR Jimmy Atkin has said ( if you read the entire articule) it is not you saying that US catholics are obligated it is the Church that says we are.
You have not given one Bishop saying otherwise. There is not confusion in the cannon law about this it is quite clear. Catholic are to abstain form meat on all fridays except solemnities. the Bishop may offer antlernate. what is confusing about that?![]()
The other answer was much better imo.Why would God approve of one of his children eating a rich slice of cheese cake and not the apple from the Tree of Knowledge?
The things of this world are not evil in themselves if used properly. One can eat a cheesecake and not be attached to the things of this world, and one can eat scrapes from the trash can and be attached to the things of this earth. The former is spiritually poor, the latter, being actually poor, is spiritually gluttonous. There is nothing wrong with cheesecake or meat or anything else. God through his Church has determined that no one will eat meat on Friday in order to show their obedience to him and also so that they can mortify themselves in some way from the things of this earth. You may say that not everyone likes meat. It is impossible to choose any particular food that everyone likes without choosing something that would be detrimental to health, and even then I don’t know if you could find one. In any case, meat has historical reasons, and besides it is much easier, in fact, to give up sweets than it is meat, which gives more sustenance to the body. This may not be true in 2010 or for modern man addicted to candy and sugar, but as I said, there are historical reasons.
AmenSo in any case I think *let us do penance on Friday’s *for all the good reason that it is a day of penance and for all the reasons the Bishops note in their document
With joy![]()
There a lot of us in the area and the more we talk about the more bcome aware that it is still the way it is suppose to be.I’ll wait till he’s recovered more. I don’t want to bother him just yet.
Funny, around these parts you’re the only other Catholic I know that doesn’t eat meat on Fridays when it’s not Lent.
Bookcat,My other change was “too late”…
So here is the post in full:
I really understand your approach…it was mine.
But it seems from Jimmy Akin’s and the Theologian I mentioned and the example from the Canon Lawyer…that there is not “obligation” but then again…perhaps one could still argue as you are doing that there is…but then again there can be said it seems that there is a “doubt” here…(the way Canon Law means doubt) and thus Canon 14 kicks in…as I noted…
So in any case I think *let us do penance on Friday’s *for all the good reason that it is a day of penance and for all the reasons the Bishops note in their document
With joy![]()
The Bishops were trying I think very much in 1966 to emphasize that the moral obligation to abstain from meat on Fridays outside of Lent and Holy Week was no longer there and to get this across so people would not scruple about it…Bookcat,
One canon lawyer or Jimmy Akin or a few people saying something does not constitute legitimate doubt of the law. You can find a handful of probablist moral theologians who will say just about anything. That doesn’t mean we can follow their opinion. If someone has a definitive document to bring forth, that would be great.
God bless.
Is there a document that has the exact language about this? That would make it very important in understanding its role in the current discussion. If it did not establish particular law (which I assume it didn’t), then the 1983 code trumps it.The Bishops were trying I think very much in 1966 to emphasize that the moral obligation to abstain from meat on Fridays outside of Lent and Holy Week was no longer there and to get this across so people would not scruple about it…
If you look back to post 17 you can see the link to the document in question. As the Church sometimes tends to do, they make it so that it can be interpretted a variety of different ways. I am going to contact the USCCB today if I am able to get a legit answer on this.Is there a document that has the exact language about this? That would make it very important in understanding its role in the current discussion. If it did not establish particular law (which I assume it didn’t), then the 1983 code trumps it.
I think that the proper information is not even clear and available to priests. Yesterday, I talked to my confessor and he stated that we do not have to abstain from meat anymore (during regular Fridays) but we must perform acts of corporal mercy if we do not abstain from meat. This does not appear to be fully consistent with either the explicit paragraphs of Canon Law (mandatory abstinence) or the pastoral letter of 1966 where we have only an exhortation to perform another sacrifice. I am really tempted to write to my Bishop and ask for clarification once and forever. As a catechist I do not want to present to the students something that is subjective (personal devotion) as objective (mandated by the CCL or by the Bishop). I know where I stand but I do not want to give misleading information either way.This has been a great deal of help & I thank you all for your (name removed by moderator)ut. I have decided not to talk to the Bishop re this priest. It may have been misunderstanding on my part though I do believe he did say that is doesnt matter anymore. However, he hasnt ever preached any message other than Church teaching in his homilies. That is why I will leave it lay. I will not have the children go to him for confession, just to be sure.
I dont think he was using it as a point to teach me not to be scrupulous. I have made all sorts of stretches of rules & rationality, in the past, to justify all sorts of bad behavior by me. That is why I do get a bit concerned when I catch myself giving in to temptations. I have 2 great sins, gluttony has been one I have struggled with, not only gluttony of food but other things. I also have a strong desire for my children to not see their mother as a hypocrite. When I make a vow, I try very hard to stick to it, not only for myself & my holiness but to be a good example to them. I had 2 do as I say, not as I do parents lol.
Again, thank you all very much. I enjoy the forums very much and have learned quite a bit lurking.
The document is the one from 1966 as noted. It was later confirmed again by Rome after the 1983 Code… See Jimmy AkinIs there a document that has the exact language about this? That would make it very important in understanding its role in the current discussion. If it did not establish particular law (which I assume it didn’t), then the 1983 code trumps it.