S
sosayi1960
Guest
The boys are touching the Priest, it makes my blood run cold.
The Priest is looking away. I think it’s terrible.
The Priest is looking away. I think it’s terrible.
I guess they might be touching him, but I don’t think so.The boys are touching the Priest, it makes my blood run cold.
The Priest is looking away. I think it’s terrible.
I think that they are holding up the back of his garment. Up until the Vatican two the priest faced the altar not the congregation.The boys are touching the Priest, it makes my blood run cold.
The Priest is looking away. I think it’s terrible.
Neurotic or psychotic maybe. I was an altar server for over 5 years in the Old Rite. They’re not touching the priest. Nor is he touching them.The boys are touching the Priest, it makes my blood run cold.
I changed it. It shouldn’t be an issue nowNeurotic or psychotic maybe. They’re not touching the priest. Nor is he touching them.
Except when Christ was on Earth, He was in his human form. In the Church, He is in His Godly form. Were not the men of the OT reverent in their address to God? Did they not fall on their faces? Was not Moses’ appearance changed because He looked upon God?Our parish is like a catacomb before mass. Feels rather empty. The silence is not always golden. I can’t imagine the followers of the Lord never spoke around him. They talked and eat with him even after the Resurrection.
Very much so. In fact, only the high priest was allowed in the Holy of Holies and it was only permitted once a year.Were not the men of the OT reverent in their address to God?
Very true. But my point is that sacred silence is not only important, but it is necessary in the sanctuary.Very much so. In fact, only the high priest was allowed in the Holy of Holies and it was only permitted once a year.
Big contrast between then and now.
Exactly, now that the Church has removed the communion rail and basically made the “Holy of Holies” accessible to all.But my point is that sacred silence is not only important, but it is necessary …
So true.Exactly, now that the Church has removed the communion rail and basically made the “Holy of Holies” accessible to all.
Actually, Vat II did nothing of the sort.Vatican 2 clarified that women have a ministry role in the Mass so there really isn’t an explanation as to why we shouldn’t have girl alter servers other than the preference of the bishop…
Wow! P and L, I think it was beautiful & you shouldn’t changed it!Good heavens, where DID you get that picture. I think it’s Vulgar. Yuck. Not very Christian . It’s awful
Yes, well… I didn’t want to get a message from the mods regarding my picture offending someone, so I just changed it.Wow! P and L, I think it was beautiful & you shouldn’t changed it!
Really, I know alot of people in my class who left Christianity because some parts were such racism. Back in the day, women didn’t have rights. The Bible only focuses on the rights of men, because it was written by men. Men didn’t think women had any place in religion, so that is the real reason behind why all priests are male, no girl alter servers, etc.My pastor is a very traditional sort of priest, and I consider myself a traditional catholic also. He told me that he doesn’t want girl altar servers, and I agree with him. I tried to explain to my sister and she thought I was being sexist. I know that traditionally women shouldn’t be in the sanctuary during the Mass, but I couldn’t explain why. Someone Please Help me in explaining why we shouldn’t have girl altar servers!!!
And taking the spot of a boy who could one day become a priest. The girl can never be a priest.I disagree. If she is serving, she is growing spiritually.
Deb,…thanks…you just lowered my blood pressure. I will read on…in this thread.In other sections of the bible Paul speaks of females who prophesies, so he couldn’t have been against women ever taking part in church. If you look at the culture of the people who he was addressing, you will see that the Corinthians were very controlling of wives. Some women were not allowed to leave their homes. So when they met in groups they tended to be very talkative. It would be very rude for anyone-male or female-to talk during mass.
I don’t know if I’d agree with that. I served as altar boy for over 5 years because I thought that that was my role within the Church. I did nothing to deserve thanks or praise for it; it was my job. I didn’t receive any special blessings from God or had any more assurances from heaven for doing it. What I did outside of the altar service, though, added or subtracted from my spiritual life.She is serving, she is growing spiritually.
taking it a step further, blacktiger…if God the Father had sent a “female”…(back in the day)…would anyone have taken her seriously? Doubtful…she would have been labeled a heretic and more than likely stoned to death with hours of her first time at preaching. He sent his Son, a male. He knew He would be sacrificed and not well received by all people…but because of times…as you stated…a man had a chance…though briefly to organize a band of followers…who would continue the message.Really, I know alot of people in my class who left Christianity because some parts were such racism. Back in the day, women didn’t have rights. The Bible only focuses on the rights of men, because it was written by men. Men didn’t think women had any place in religion, so that is the real reason behind why all priests are male, no girl alter servers, etc.
Good arguments, though women did serve as priestesses in the Old Testament. However, would you accuse Christ of being a “racist” for selecting only men to carry forth the priesthood? It’s part of the New Testament, I thought.Really, I know alot of people in my class who left Christianity because some parts were such racism. Back in the day, women didn’t have rights. The Bible only focuses on the rights of men, because it was written by men. Men didn’t think women had any place in religion, so that is the real reason behind why all priests are male, no girl alter servers, etc.