P
Potato1
Guest
Ok we need to tone down here, I didnt call you names I called your position ignorant and rediculous and wrong. That is not you, just your position on this subject. I hope you read the CCC with more vigelance than my posts… You are bordering on hysteria with your defense of the “Holy” Catechism. It is a history book. So is the Bible. It enacaptures what we believe like an encyclopedia, so does the Bible. the Bible is the infallible inspired word of God, It does not change it does not error it does not waver. teachings, with a little t DO CHANGE DO WAVER And aren’;t infallible. I believe the CCC even states that.Boy Potato, I’m wondering where in all of Christianity does it say to call people names. I guess it wouldn’t matter if it were in the CCC. But again, you have not answered my question which for the third time, has been, “What in the CCC is non-essential to our faith?” I don’t care if I have hijacked this thread, you owe me an answer. When you call my Catechism a history book or an encyclopedia for crying out loud, you need to answer questions like this. Or would I be ignorant ridiculous and wrong?
Scripture, Tradition, Magesterium
It is not necessary to my faith to believe that the CCC is corect in the matters of what a muslim believes, if unbaptized people are saved, or if masturbation addiction is a mitigating circumstance in the mortality of sin. The CCC is post VII it contains the Truth and infallible Dogma, but not everything in it is infallible. PLease, introspect at your opinion and ask yourself if this is really worth it. If you wish to continue please PM as I feel that this subject is closed on this thread.
PS I Submitted the CCC question to the ask an apologist board so we will see if they will answer.
Again, I do not want you to feel that I am calling you anything other than misled.
God bless.