N
nobeerinheaven
Guest
It’s perfectly acceptable that a husband take counsel from his wife about the decisions he makes with respect to the family, but the ultimate authority in the family resides with him (even if the methods of exercising that authority are conciliatory toward those in the family). Women should submit to their husbands as the Church to Christ, after all. The analogy is instructive both because it shows a hierarchical power structure in the family, but also because it bases that hierarchical power structure on the divine model it is derived from. Again, it might be helpful for him not to “Lord it over” you (and in the context of the verse, that’s an illuminating pun you use), but wives have an obligation to submit even if he acts as though he is the Lord and you are his submissive people. After all, that’s St. Paul’s divinely inspired analogy in describing marriage.You know, I am a stay-at-home mom, but that was a decision DH and I made together. He would never “tell” me what I am to do, as if he were a master and I a slave. And neither would I do that to him. He was just saying to me last night, he has had discussions with two different women at work about how their boyfriends won’t “let” them do certain things. He totally does not understand the mindset, either of the men who think they have the right to dictate to their women, or of the women who sit there and allow the men to dictate their lives. He knows that if he ever tried to treat me that way, it would go over like a lead balloon. Being the head of his household does not mean he lords over any of us. And he is very much the head of the family, and I respect and treat him as such.
Of course Catholicism doesn’t necessitate a “full quiver.” I didn’t say that or imply that. However, NFP does make it difficult to hold off child bearing as days of abstinence coincide with a woman’s fertile days (days which are some of the most difficult to abstain on, for various hormonal reasons). Since it makes it more difficult, it makes it easier to have more children as one reconsiders the reasons for abstaining in the first place (many times finding them inadequate, resulting in a decision not to abstain on that day). Since NFP does seem to make having more children easier than having fewer, a good Catholic with respect to contraception will more than likely have more children than those who contracept. It’s no law, since some people have strong will power, but it is a useful prediction. And this more frequent baby-making does make the new-wave female role particularly difficult to maintain; repeated time out of the office makes it both difficult to come back and difficult to progress. That’s good, I think, as that wasn’t an ideal vocation for them in the first place; likewise, childbirth frustrates an unnatural and unhelpful desire.Your last comment about “being a good Catholic with regard to contraception” is offensive for a couple of reasons. Being a good Catholic does not have to mean having as many children as are physically possible. And you are furthering the biased idea that NFP means not controlling one’s fertility. There are people who prevent pregnancy for years at a time with NFP. They are using their God-given brains to limit their fertility in a way that corresponds with Church teaching and leaves the possibilities open to God’s will.