A brief summary: The ceremonial laws were NOT written on stone by God Himself, but rather written by Moses.
It is true… that their mode of delivery was different, however, God inspired Moses to write these laws. Neh 8 calls them the law of God. The source of the 10 Commandments and the rest of the law is the same. GOD!
A. God created the tablets and they were delivered to the Israelites by Moses.
B. God created the rest of the law and it was delivered to the Israelites by Moses.
The medium it was delivered on was different… but the source is the same. God’s law is God’s law no matter how it is written or delivered. Would you dare tell God that you can ignore HIS law just because it was not written in stone?
They were NOT put in the ark of the covenant, but outside the ark.
Actually…the entire law was placed in the ARk of the Covenant. The tablets inside the large compartment because of their size and need for protection. The book, was also placed in a pocket on the Ark… because they are all part of the SAME LAW!
They were NOT eternally binding, but POINTED FORWARD TO CHRIST, THE LAMB OF GOD, TO BE SLAIN FOR OUR SINS.
Some say the Sabbath is still in effect because Ex. 31:16,17 says it was to be kept “forever,” “everlasting,” “perpetual.” But this passage also says the Sabbath was a sign only between God and Israel, so why bind it today on other people? Why take only parts of this passage and ignore the parts that specifically state that this was only between God and the Sons of Israel? And this “everlasting” law required people to be killed for violating it. If the law is still in effect today, the punishment must also be in effect. To fail to keep any part of the law is to
admit the law is not binding.
The Hebrew terms “forever,” “everlasting,” etc., do not necessarily mean a thing has no end. This is proved by many other practices which God said were “forever,” but which definitely have ceased.
Examples are:
- The Passover (Ex. 12:14)
- Incense (Ex. 30:8)
- Feast days (Lev. 23:14,21,31,41)
- Animal sacrifices (Lev. 16:29-34; 6:19-23; 2 Chron. 2:4)
- Levitical priesthood (Ex. 40:15; 29:9,26-28; 28:40-43; Num. 25:13; Deut. 18:5)
- Tabernacle worship (Ex. 27:21; 30:8,17-21; Lev. 24:5-9)
- Circumcision (Gen. 17:9-14)
- All God’s commands (Psa. 111:7; 119:151,152,160).
If these practices could cease though scripture says that they were to last “forever,” why cannot the Sabbath have ceased?
The Moral Law or 10 Commandments, were written on stone, by God Himself, they were put in the ark of the covenant, binding forever, because IF THE COMMANDMENTS COULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED, THEN CHRIST NEED NOT HAVE DIED FOR OUR SINS – HE COULD JUST HAVE CHANGED THE LAW TO NEGATE OR SINS! Read Mat 5:17-19 where Jesus clearly states: ``Think not that I have come to change the law…’’
Friedrich,
This is not accurate… First… Just because they were written on stone, does not make them any more binding or perpetual than the rest of his laws. The authority and everlasting quality has its root in God, not stone. Therefore, whether they were written on stone or not… makes no difference. This is why you cannot provide a verse that says that because they were written on stone, they will last forever. That is a man made assumption.
However: "What Scriptural proof is there that these distinctions in the laws are valid? How do we know that what was done away includes only the “law of Moses” or ceremonial law, but not the “law of God”, etc.? How do we know what laws are included in the law of God (moral law) and what laws are not? (Note that the terms “moral law” and “ceremonial law” are nowhere mentioned in the Bible.) You say the Sabbath must continue today because it was one of the Ten Commands, the “moral” “Law of God.” But the Sabbath is also repeated in parts of the Old Testament other than the Ten Commands (Ex. 31:13), and it is listed with laws and feast days that have been done away with (see Lev. 23:1-44; 19:3&30). Why doesn’t this prove the Sabbath was done away as part of the “ceremonial” “Law of Moses”?
How is the Sabbath any less “ceremonial” than these other feasts and Sabbath rests?
Second… your idea that if the law could be changed Christ would not have had to die is a logical fallacy called a false Dichotomy. You have presented the issue as being either the Law or Christ. In reality, Christ died for US… not the law! If man had not sinned, THEN Christ would not have had to die! The real dichotomy is between Man and God, not the Law.
Further, the Jewish Law was not needed to know sin.
We are told that there was sin BEFORE the law!
Romans 5:12-14: “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death
spread to all men, because all sinned --** for until the Law sin was in the world;** but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of Adam’s offense, who is a type of Him who was to come.”
I hope you are not saying that Jesus’ death made it OK for us to murder, steal, covet, dishonour our parents etc! Those moral laws are part of Jesus’ very character, and though we are saved by grace, the obedience to those laws does not save us, but makes us FIT FOR HEAVEN!
Happy day
Friedrich
Friedrich,
This is another example of the logical error of a false dichotomy. The dichotomy that you have presented is that we either keep the Jewish law, or we must not believe in any law at all.
In reality, the dichotomy is between the Old Covenant law and the New Covenant law. Just because we are not longer under the Jewish Law, does not mean that we are no longer under any law at all.
Just as if I left the United States and visited South Africa. Just because I would no longer be under US law, does not mean that I am under no law at all and free to do whatever I want. The laws change between the US and South Africa, some are the same, some are different, but I am still subject to law.
This is the same with the Old and New Covenant. Just because we are no longer under the Old Covenant does not mean that we are no longer under any covenant. The laws have changed, some are the same, some are different, but we are definitely under law.
In the New Testament, New Covenant we are commanded to:
1). To worship the Lord God only (1st commandment): no less than 50 times
Note: the prohibition against making a likeness of that in heaven or on earth is not, however,
repeated in the NT.
2). Idolatry (2nd commandment): condemned 12 times
3). Profanity (3rd commandment): condemned 4 times
4). Honoring parents (5th commandment) is taught 6 times
5). Murder (6th commandment) condemned 6 times
6). Adultery (7th commandment) condemned 12 times
7). Theft (8th commandment) condemned 4 times
8). False Witness (9th commandment) condemned 4 times
9). Covetousness (10th commandment) condemned 9 times
The Command to Keep the Seventh-Day Sabbath Holy is not mentioned once! In addition, there are literally HUNDREDS of other Old Covenant laws that are no longer listed.
But we are under a law, and we are under an authority.
Hebrews 13:17: Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you.
Do you obey this text… do you obey the leaders of God’s one and only Church that was founded nearly 2000 years ago? Or do you continue to try to follow your own truth, using your own intellect… rather than uniting with the Body of Christ?