Y
YKohen
Guest
I apologize. Quoting the Bible is SO not PC. 
You were complaining about calling it land.I have no idea what the intent of that comment was.
One of the realities in the West Bank and seemingly in the Arab world as a whole is the presence and power of āgangsā. Some are radical Islamists. Some are jockeying for political power. Some are carrying out tribal vendettas. Some are just criminals.I can only wonder what the reaction of the towns people was like. They must have felt outraged and saddened by the loss, but at the same time probably too afraid to speak out against the assassination for fear that a terrorist might find out.
What a shame.
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan had to crush the Palestinians in 1970 because they had taken over half the country in a regime of armed gangs. The country was becoming paralyzed by lawlessness and corruption and the Palestinians were likely gearing up for a Marxist revolution to topple the whole kingdom.One of the realities in the West Bank and seemingly in the Arab world as a whole is the presence and power of āgangsā. Some are radical Islamists. Some are jockeying for political power. Some are carrying out tribal vendettas. Some are just criminals.
LOLI apologize. Quoting the Bible is SO not PC.![]()
That still leaves me missing the point. But then again I am sometimes slow.You were complaining about calling it land.
So the Holocaust was his will too?In other words, you think that the Jews are more powerful than G-d Himself. because as the G-d of history, either it is or it isnāt His will. If it is, then all of the promises throughout the Bible are taking place as they were plainly written, and if it isnāt, then the only explanation is that the Jews are more powerful than He is.
And yet their numbers grow smaller and smaller by the year. Even they are recognizing Ezekiel 36-37 as now.
Nations are created for/by a people, a people are not created by a nation (except Italians).I wish someone would answer when through history there was a nation called Palestine. Not a piece of landā¦but a nation.![]()
Well, the Palestinians referred to themselves as Palestinian, later when the British came they referred to them as Palestinians.The irony is that it was ONLY the Jews who were refered to as āPalestiniansā 100 years ago.
The Arabs here refered to themselves as āArabsā or āsouthern Syriansā.
What good deed?The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan had to crush the Palestinians in 1970 because they had taken over half the country in a regime of armed gangs. The country was becoming paralyzed by lawlessness and corruption and the Palestinians were likely gearing up for a Marxist revolution to topple the whole kingdom.
No good deed goes unpunished I guess!
Now you are just being facetious. Not all Israelis/Jews/non-Jewish Israelis are zionists.Nice link![]()
All either misleading or irrelevant.So the Holocaust was his will too?
Nations are created for/by a people, a people are not created by a nation (except Italians).
Well, the Palestinians referred to themselves as Palestinian, later when the British came they referred to them as Palestinians.
What good deed?
All either misleading or irrelevant.
Hereās the point. Iām tired of uneducated Catholics with regards to the Palestinians. Theyāve been thrown out of Arab countries. Why? Because they are a problem where ever they live. The Arabs argue with Israel over this because they FEAR having to absorb the Palestinians.
- His point is absurd
- Nations donāt exist before they exist, all are created at some point and nation-states are create by a people (only exception I can think of is Israel). The British promised a state to the Palestinians.
- His point was wrong.
- Francoist was saying no good deed goes unpunished so I asked āwhat good deed did Jordan do?ā
In that case Israelis and Palistanians are more alike then different. Europeans did not think that integration was possible and did not want another Holocaust.Hereās the point. Iām tired of uneducated Catholics with regards to the Palestinians. Theyāve been thrown out of Arab countries. Why? Because they are a problem where ever they live. The Arabs argue with Israel over this because they FEAR having to absorb the Palestinians.
Jews and Arabs are more alike than different. I agree. Except for one thing. Arabs are mainly Muslim. Iāve read the unholy Koran. It is vial and violent. As a Christian you should be concerned about what Mohammad had to say about you. Jews just ignore the differences between Jews and Christians for the most part. Yes there are radical Orthodox Jews that hate Christianityā¦but I havenāt seen them lop off the heads of many Christians lately. Please stop being a politically correct āCatholicā. Itās unbecoming.In that case Israelis and Palistanians are more alike then different. Europeans did not think that integration was possible and did not want another Holocaust.
597 The historical complexity of Jesusā trial is apparent in the Gospel accounts. The personal sin of the participants (Judas, the Sanhedrin, Pilate) is known to God alone. Hence we cannot lay responsibility for the trial on the Jews in Jerusalem as a whole, despite the outcry of a manipulated crowd and the global reproaches contained in the apostlesā calls to conversion after Pentecost.385 Jesus himself, in forgiving them on the cross, and Peter in following suit, both accept āthe ignoranceā of the Jews of Jerusalem and even of their leaders.386 Still less can we extend responsibility to other Jews of different times and places, based merely on the crowdās cry: āHis blood be on us and on our children!ā, a formula for ratifying a judicial sentence.387 As the Church declared at the Second Vatican Council:In that case Israelis and Palistanians are more alike then different. Europeans did not think that integration was possible and did not want another Holocaust.
Something tells me you would defend Muslims but not Jews.In that case Israelis and Palistanians are more alike then different. Europeans did not think that integration was possible and did not want another Holocaust.
Large amounts of refugees create problems by the nature of being refugees. Why would non-Palestinians want to help Palestinians?Hereās the point. Iām tired of uneducated Catholics with regards to the Palestinians. Theyāve been thrown out of Arab countries. Why? Because they are a problem where ever they live. The Arabs argue with Israel over this because they FEAR having to absorb the Palestinians.
I already answered that in my previous post. Man has free will to do good or evil. Those who were involved in perpetrating the Holocaust chose evil.So the Holocaust was his will too?
You are seriously missing the point. Why should the Jews take in Arabs?Large amounts of refugees create problems by the nature of being refugees. Why would non-Palestinians want to help Palestinians?
You are being politically correct. The history of Jews in Europe tells us that serious adherents of the faith are just as dangerous as fanatical Muslims. Maybe the US hasnāt learned that lesson, being a young nation, but Europeans sent them away for a reason. You do not need to lop off heads to destroy a nation.Jews and Arabs are more alike than different. I agree. Except for one thing. Arabs are mainly Muslim. Iāve read the unholy Koran. It is vial and violent. As a Christian you should be concerned about what Mohammad had to say about you. Jews just ignore the differences between Jews and Christians for the most part. Yes there are radical Orthodox Jews that hate Christianityā¦but I havenāt seen them lop off the heads of many Christians lately. Please stop being a politically correct āCatholicā. Itās unbecoming.
This is quite right. Leaders of other Arab nations have only wanted to use the Palestinians as pawns in their fight against the Jews. Palestinians are pretty much second-class citizens to them. It just so happens that the Jews are even lower.Large amounts of refugees create problems by the nature of being refugees. Why would non-Palestinians want to help Palestinians?