An Eternal Hell Doesn't Make Sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flopfoot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The definition of “eternal” is “outside of time”.

ICXC NIKA
The definition of eternal is actually ‘lasting or existing forever; without end or beginning’.

If something lasts of forever, that does not necessarily mean it remains the same all the time.

But if something is static, not changeable then I think it is impossible for it to be a state of suffering.
 
To make it easy - God gives us free-will to make our own choice:

A. Follow God’s rules on Earth and be with Him for all eternity. (Heaven)

B. Don’t follow God’s rules on Earth and be without Him for all eternity. (Hell)

Work out your own salvation through fear and trembling.
 
The definition of eternal is actually ‘lasting or existing forever; without end or beginning’.

If something lasts of forever, that does not necessarily mean it remains the same all the time.
Both statements are correct.
  1. Eternal is to be distinguished from immortal, which has a beginning but not an end.
  2. The devils were once in heaven, but did not remain there.
 
Both statements are correct.
  1. Eternal is to be distinguished from immortal, which has a beginning but not an end.
  2. The devils were once in heaven, but did not remain there.
Actually it seems to me that hell did have a beginning in time, didn’t it? So how can it be eternal?

Whether you consider hell a state or place (there seems to be some confusion about which it is) - if it is place, it must have been created when the universe was created and if it is a state then it was created when the first person got into that state.

I am not sure a place or state that has a beginning in time can be called eternal, can it?

It seems like Hell is just everlasting, not eternal.

Actually even Jesus’s words seem to say ‘everlasting’ instead of ‘eternal’ (of course it may all be lost in translation).

I don’t think a person will suffer or even feel anything in a place with no time, even if it is everlasting.
 
I don’t think a person will suffer or even feel anything in a place with no time, even if it is everlasting.
We don’t really have much information about heaven or hell, except that one place is a place of reward and the other a place of suffering. Jesus promises one or the other for each of us, and the Church teaches that purgatory is a halfway place between here and heaven, not between hell and heaven.
 
Actually it seems to me that hell did have a beginning in time, didn’t it? So how can it be eternal?

Whether you consider hell a state or place (there seems to be some confusion about which it is) - if it is place, it must have been created when the universe was created and if it is a state then it was created when the first person got into that state.

I am not sure a place or state that has a beginning in time can be called eternal, can it?

It seems like Hell is just everlasting, not eternal.

Actually even Jesus’s words seem to say ‘everlasting’ instead of ‘eternal’ (of course it may all be lost in translation).

I don’t think a person will suffer or even feel anything in a place with no time, even if it is everlasting.
Today, I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell. It is a place of great torture; how awesomely large and extensive it is! The kinds of tortures I saw: the first torture that constitutes hell is the loss of God; the second is perpetual remorse of conscience; the third is that one’s condition will never change; the fourth is the fire that will penetrate the soul without destroying it – a terrible suffering, since it is a purely spiritual fire, lit by God’s anger; the fifth torture is continual darkness and a terrible suffocating smell, and, despite the darkness, the devils and the souls of the damned see each other and all the evil, both of others and their own; the sixth torture is the constant company of Satan; the seventh torture is horrible despair, hatred of God, vile words, curses and blasphemies. These are the tortures suffered by all the damned together, but that is not the end of the sufferings. There are special tortures destined for particular souls. These are the torments of the senses. Each soul undergoes terrible and indescribable sufferings, related to the manner in which it has sinned. (741)

Let the sinner know that he will be tortured throughout all eternity, in those senses which he made use of to sin. I am writing this at the command of God, so that no soul may find an excuse by saying there is no hell, or that nobody has ever been there, and so no one can say what it is like.
I, Sister Faustina, by the order of God, have visited the abysses of hell so that I might tell souls about it and testify to its existence. (741)

divinemercy.com/faustina/
 
We don’t really have much information about heaven or hell, except that one place is a place of reward and the other a place of suffering. Jesus promises one or the other for each of us, and the Church teaches that purgatory is a halfway place between here and heaven, not between hell and heaven.
That makes sense. There are many things we don’t know much about, hell and heaven are just two such things.

But if we don’t know much about hell (or heaven), then we can not say that there is no time in hell . Maybe there is some sort of time in hell and heaven (of course time is probably not experienced the same way there as it is on earth)

If there is time, then things are not frozen in place, so the state of a person in hell can change, wouldn’t you say?
 
That makes sense. There are many things we don’t know much about, hell and heaven are just two such things.

But if we don’t know much about hell (or heaven), then we can not say that there is no time in hell . Maybe there is some sort of time in hell and heaven (of course time is probably not experienced the same way there as it is on earth)

If there is time, then things are not frozen in place, so the state of a person in hell can change, wouldn’t you say?
Some changes remain impossible though.

Dead human bodies exist in time, but never change so as to resume their aliveness; presumably Hell involves a comparable situation of being, so is called the “second death”.

ICXC NIKA.
 
Some changes remain impossible though.

Dead human bodies exist in time, but never change so as to resume their aliveness; presumably Hell involves a comparable situation of being, so is called the “second death”.

ICXC NIKA.
Dead human bodies do not just exist in time, they rot, decay and then eventually turn to dust.

What is the comparable situation of being for souls in hell?

If there is no time in hell, I think there can be no suffering or pain or feeling - the soul would be even more unconscious than a body in a coma.

On the other hand. if time exists in hell, there must be some change over time, don’t you think? If so what is the nature of this change?
 
Dead human bodies do not just exist in time, they rot, decay and then eventually turn to dust.

What is the comparable situation of being for souls in hell?

If there is no time in hell, I think there can be no suffering or pain or feeling - the soul would be even more unconscious than a body in a coma.

On the other hand. if time exists in hell, there must be some change over time, don’t you think? If so what is the nature of this change?
Just as the dead human body changes in time so as to cease being, but never to resume being alive; the dead in Hell would undergo deteriorative change (whatever that means spiritually) **if **there were time there – but not change so as to be released from
Hell.

ICXC NIKA
 
Just as the dead human body changes in time so as to cease being, but never to resume being alive; the dead in Hell would undergo deteriorative change (whatever that means spiritually) **if **there were time there – but not change so as to be released from
Hell.

ICXC NIKA
This sounds logical, but the soul in hell being a conscious person, could conceivably change for the better. Or is he prohibited from changing for the better? That would be a rather strange prohibition.

This idea of an hell which is eternal, but still has a beginning in time - a hell which may or may not have time - where people are suffering, but are still frozen in time and space - where people may deteriorate in some way, but can not change for the better even if they wish to - this whole idea seems rather self-contradictory and illogical. Not very well thought out, it seems to me.
 
This sounds logical, but the soul in hell being a conscious person, could conceivably change for the better. Or is he prohibited from changing for the better? That would be a rather strange prohibition.

This idea of an hell which is eternal, but still has a beginning in time - a hell which may or may not have time - where people are suffering, but are not still frozen in time and space - where people may deteriorate in some way, but can not change for the better even if they wish to - this whole idea seems rather self-contradictory and illogical. Not very well thought out, it seems to me.
Not really.

Even assuming the progression of time in Hell (which I for one do not hold), repentance from sin requires grace from God.

There is no such grace in Hell.

ICXC NIKA
 
Not really.

Even assuming the progression of time in Hell (which I for one do not hold), repentance from sin requires grace from God.

There is no such grace in Hell.

ICXC NIKA
I did not realize that. I thought humans are supposed to repent on their own, that forgiveness needed grace from God.

So you are saying that repentance can not be a self-willed decision/action taken by the sinner, but only happens upon intervention by God? God in fact chooses which persons among us repent?

I thought God only chooses which one is forgiven and repentance is something we can do from our own free will, not true?
 
I did not realize that. I thought humans are supposed to repent on their own, that forgiveness needed grace from God.

So you are saying that repentance can not be a self-willed decision/action taken by the sinner, but only happens upon intervention by God? God in fact chooses which persons among us repent?

I thought God only chooses which one is forgiven and repentance is something we can do from our own free will, not true?
If repentance did not involve grace, but forgiveness did, you could have the situation of persons repenting and yet denied forgiveness. But, Scripturally, those who repent receive mercy.

Alternatively, repentance from sin requires faith, which is itself a grace.

ICXC NIKA
 
If repentance did not involve grace, but forgiveness did, you could have the situation of persons repenting and yet denied forgiveness. But, Scripturally, those who repent receive mercy.

Alternatively, repentance from sin requires faith, which is itself a grace.

ICXC NIKA
Ok, so even faith is not something that person can decide to have by himself, but only if offered to him upon God’s choosing?

It almost sounds like humans have no free will at all. They can not even have faith by their own free will.

Once they have sinned, they can only repent if they are allowed to have faith by God? This is all quite interesting.

So to summarize - hell is an eternal place (or state) which still has a beginning in time, even though it is eternal and maybe timeless. If hell does have time, the soul constantly suffers and may deteriorate spiritually, but is prohibited from ever changing for the better, or ever repenting or ever having faith. If hell does not have time, the soul in a frozen state with no consciousness, no feeling, no suffering, no pain - essentially in a coma like state. Like I said, it does not add up.
 
Ok, so even faith is not something that person can decide to have by himself, but only if offered to him upon God’s choosing?

It almost sounds like humans have no free will at all. They can not even have faith by their own free will.

Once they have sinned, they can only repent if they are allowed to have faith by God? This is all quite interesting.

So to summarize - hell is an eternal place (or state) which still has a beginning in time, even though it is eternal and maybe timeless. If hell does have time, the soul constantly suffers and may deteriorate spiritually, but is prohibited from ever changing for the better, or ever repenting or ever having faith. If hell does not have time, the soul in a frozen state with no consciousness, no feeling, no suffering, no pain - essentially in a coma like state. Like I said, it does not add up.
Tell you what, 77, you raise some good points, and to do them justice I will need to ask a very knowledgeable priest about them.

Which I will do in the next few days.

Shall we table the matter until then?

ICXC NIKA
 
Tell you what, 77, you raise some good points, and to do them justice I will need to ask a very knowledgeable priest about them.

Which I will do in the next few days.

Shall we table the matter until then?

ICXC NIKA
Sounds good, no hurry.
 
Ok, so even faith is not something that person can decide to have by himself, but only if offered to him upon God’s choosing? It almost sounds like humans have no free will at all. They can not even have faith by their own free will.
Free will doesn’t imply unlimited power.
Once they have sinned, they can only repent if they are allowed to have faith by God? This is all quite interesting.
Many people without faith repent.
So to summarize - hell is an eternal place (or state) which still has a beginning in time, even though it is eternal and maybe timeless. If hell does have time, the soul constantly suffers and may deteriorate spiritually, but is prohibited from ever changing for the better, or ever repenting or ever having faith.
The only criterion of being in hell is the choice to be independent.
If hell does not have time, the soul in a frozen state with no consciousness, no feeling, no suffering, no pain - essentially in a coma like state. Like I said, it does not add up.
Timelessness does not exclude spiritual activity. Otherwise Creation would be impossible.
 
This sounds logical, but the soul in hell being a conscious person, could conceivably change for the better. Or is he prohibited from changing for the better? That would be a rather strange prohibition.

This idea of an hell which is eternal, but still has a beginning in time - a hell which may or may not have time - where people are suffering, but are still frozen in time and space - where people may deteriorate in some way, but can not change for the better even if they wish to - this whole idea seems rather self-contradictory and illogical. Not very well thought out, it seems to me.
People can choose to change but they need not change to the extent of losing their independence - which is the very reason why they choose hell with full knowledge of the consequences. Hell is not a trap but the result of a carefully meditated revolt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top