An EV comments on the ongoing struggle between Catholics and LDS.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mudcat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought that was your understanding of it. Don’t you teach that the Trinity is “three persons in one God”? Don’t you teach that they are “coequal”? Don’t you teach that they are of “one substance”? Where is any of that found in the Bible? And how does it make any sense? :confused:
“Let us make man in OUR IMAGE”

Notice it does not say “our images”
 
I thought that was your understanding of it. Don’t you teach that the Trinity is “three persons in one God”? Don’t you teach that they are “coequal”? Don’t you teach that they are of “one substance”? Where is any of that found in the Bible? And how does it make any sense? :confused:
Let’s review your post:
The chimera is “a mythical, fire-breathing monster, commonly represented with a lion’s head, and goat’s body, and a serpent’s tail” (Dictionary.com). I would say that is a good depiction of the absurdity of Trinitarian theology.
In other words, Trinitarianism portrays the Trinity as though it were a three headed monster with one body, which is not remotely biblical.
Again, no Trinitarian would find this to be an accurate analogy or portrayal of what Trinitarian theology teaches. Saying that it is a “three headed monster with one body”, as if the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are attached to each other (“substance” is not referring to a physical oneness, which you would know if you’ve actually read about what the word translated as “substance” refers to), is obviously a false, heretical idea that Trinitarians do not embrace.

Again, the above shows that you don’t have a clue what Trinitarianism actually teaches.
 
Let’s review your post:

Again, no Trinitarian would find this to be an accurate analogy or portrayal of what Trinitarian theology teaches. Saying that it is a “three headed monster with one body”, as if the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are attached to each other (“substance” is not referring to a physical oneness, which you would know if you’ve actually read about what the word translated as “substance” refers to), is obviously a false, heretical idea that Trinitarians do not embrace.

Again, the above shows that you don’t have a clue what Trinitarianism actually teaches.
That does not answer my post at all.
 
That does not answer my post at all.
Your previous response to my post didn’t answer my post(since you did not address the issue of “spirit chimera” to which I was responding to).

The fact of the matter is that anyone that compares the Trinity to a chimera, or implies a belief that “one substance” is referring to a physical oneness, where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are attached to each other, is not actually familiar with what the Trinity doctrine teaches.

You and Todd fall into that category.
 
Your previous response to my post didn’t answer my post(since you did not address the issue of “spirit chimera” to which I was responding to).

The fact of the matter is that anyone that compares the Trinity to a chimera, or implies a belief that “one substance” is referring to a physical oneness, where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are attached to each other, is not actually familiar with what the Trinity doctrine teaches.

You and Todd fall into that category.
Answer already given in post #80.
 
No, I asked you for biblical evidence of the spirit chimera aspect of the catholic trinity - the
three co-equal Persons of One Nature.

Personally, i don’t think there is biblical support and the catholics relied on the discussion or revelation of the Nicean council to create this doctrine. This is perfectly AOK as a source for Catholic doctrine.
there is no Biblical support that God had a daddy and was once sinful, but y’all teach it anyway
 
Javl,
nothing posted as scripture references supports the below bold text. That is where the LDS interpretation of the bible differs from the Roman Catholic
If you want it in “black and white”, then the answer is NO. You will not find any direct reference to the Trinity. The same holds true for the word Trinity. Direct reference is not required, or needed, since, as I have mentioned before, the OT and NT abounds with the revelation of, and reference to, the Holy Trinity. Anyone who uses proper exegesis will see and understand this. And, also, the scriptures will also show that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God.
There are not three Gods, but one. Three separate persons and each person is of the Divine Nature and is, as we humans are of a Human nature. This is a difficult concept for many to realize and understand, but we accept and believe what has been revealed to us in the Bible since itis the Word of God.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
If you want it in “black and white”, then the answer is NO. You will not find any direct reference to the Trinity. . . .
Wrong! Direct reference to the Trinity does exist in the Bible aplenty. What doesn’t exist in the Bible is any reference to the absurd Trinitarian theology of the post Apostate Christendom.
 
Wrong! Direct reference to the Trinity does exist in the Bible aplenty. What doesn’t exist in the Bible is any reference to the absurd Trinitarian theology of the post Apostate Christendom.
Sorry, already addressed. What is “absurd” is your understanding of Trinitarian theology, including your understanding of words like “substance”. Saying that the chimera is a good analogy tells us all we need to know about your [lack of] understanding of our beliefs.
 
Wrong! Direct reference to the Trinity does exist in the Bible aplenty. What doesn’t exist in the Bible is any reference to the absurd Trinitarian theology of the post Apostate Christendom.
Now that’s a bit harsh, I assume their Trinitarian theology flows from whatever revelation supported the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD
 
If you want it in “black and white”, then the answer is NO. You will not find any direct reference to the Trinity. The same holds true for the word Trinity. Direct reference is not required, or needed, since, as I have mentioned before, the OT and NT abounds with the revelation of, and reference to, the Holy Trinity. Anyone who uses proper exegesis will see and understand this. And, also, the scriptures will also show that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God.
There are not three Gods, but one. Three separate persons and each person is of the Divine Nature and is, as we humans are of a Human nature. This is a difficult concept for many to realize and understand, but we accept and believe what has been revealed to us in the Bible since itis the Word of God.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
Agreed. The Bible is clear on the Trinity, and it is consistent with our views on God. There are three distinct Persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, that are one God. There is nothing in our Trinitarian beliefs that posit a “spirit chimera” or any other absurd notion held by Zerinus and Todd. We don’t believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are attached to each other, or that they share a body. Saying that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are “of one substance” is not referring to a physical substance or physical oneness (as Zerinus and Todd would have us believe in their absurd understanding of the Trinity), but is referring to the one “nature” that they are all of, as you have already stated. This “spirit chimera” nonsense is even more false when we realize that Trinitarians believe that only God the Son incarnated on this earth, and not the Father or the Holy Spirit (likewise, the Son prayed to the Father, not to Himself).

But I must thank Z and T for the laugh today. Spirit chimera…:rolleyes::rotfl:
 
Now that’s a bit harsh, I assume their Trinitarian theology flows from whatever revelation supported the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD
The Council of Nicaea and the Nicene Creed do not support, or teach, Trinitarianism, or the Trinitarian theology of present day Christendom. That came later in the history of the development of Christian theology.
 
The biblical doctrine of the Trinity is a Trinity of three distinct and separate beings: The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; with the Son and the Holy Spirit being subordinate to the Father.

zerinus, I am perplexed that you gave your biblical definition using a Catholic term “Trinity” when the word “Trinity” is never used in the biblical text?

So it is with your LDS definition, you claim to hold to a biblical definition but you use a Catholic term to try and define your theology of God, I find something very wrong with this, when you claim to an apostatized definition of the Trinity occurred, to which you are never able to give a date or historical incident of your accusation. Until the LDS can qualify or back up this apostate accusation with fact, let us leave it for now as an LDS belief based on LDS fictional writings not fact.

Never the less, lets deal with your doctrine using a Catholic Term attached to it.
  1. Does the LDS church borrow the Catholic term “Trinity” as to define 3 seperated gods?
  2. Does LDS use trinity to define Jesus as a god seperate from the Father god, who is seperate from the holy spirit god? making the LDS doctrine of the trinity to mean 3 seperate gods altogether.
  3. You quotrf the LDS doctrine to believe is; “3 distinct and seperate beings” is this defining 3 seperate divine beings or 3 seperate gods as being distinct from each other?
  4. Does the LDS believe that two of these gods, the son and the holy spirit are subordinate to only the Father (one distinct god) which is seperated from the son god and the holy spirit god? confirming the LDS doctrine is to believe in 3 seperate gods not one?
  5. Can you clarify here, if items 1 -4 is your interpretation of the LDS belief in the trnity? If not can you clarify what is different?
Does your LDS “trinity” doctrine conflict with this biblical passage of the trinity? from John 10:30 The Father and I are one."

In conclusion and please correct me if Iam wrong here?
The LDS trinity doctrine believe in 3 seperate gods, never one god.

Peace be with you
 
Trinity IS supported. The fact that God had a daddy and was sinful, the LDS belief, is not supported by anything
 
  1. Does the LDS church borrow the Catholic term “Trinity” as to define 3 seperated gods?
No, the LDS do not use the term Trinity as defined by Catholics. The LDS belief is a Godhead comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
  1. Does LDS use trinity to define Jesus as a god seperate from the Father god, who is seperate from the holy spirit god? making the LDS doctrine of the trinity to mean 3 seperate gods altogether.
  1. You quotrf the LDS doctrine to believe is; “3 distinct and seperate beings” is this defining 3 seperate divine beings or 3 seperate gods as being distinct from each other?
  1. Does the LDS believe that two of these gods, the son and the holy spirit are subordinate to only the Father (one distinct god) which is seperated from the son god and the holy spirit god? confirming the LDS doctrine is to believe in 3 seperate gods not one?
The LDS Godhead is comprised of three separate divine beings who are completely united in purpose.
  1. Can you clarify here, if items 1 -4 is your interpretation of the LDS belief in the trnity? If not can you clarify what is different?
LDS believe that the members of the Godhead are one in the sense that they function together as a single, perfect unit - not that they are literally the same being.
Does your LDS “trinity” doctrine conflict with this biblical passage of the trinity? from John 10:30 The Father and I are one."
It works fine for the LDS definition of having a perfect unity of purpose. Just like a good husband and wife team are as one. (weak but best example I could think of quickly)
 
zerinus, I am perplexed that you gave your biblical definition using a Catholic term “Trinity” when the word “Trinity” is never used in the biblical text?

So it is with your LDS definition, you claim to hold to a biblical definition but you use a Catholic term to try and define your theology of God, I find something very wrong with this, when you claim to an apostatized definition of the Trinity occurred, to which you are never able to give a date or historical incident of your accusation. Until the LDS can qualify or back up this apostate accusation with fact, let us leave it for now as an LDS belief based on LDS fictional writings not fact.
Trinity is not a Catholic term. Trinity is a word in the vocabulary used to refer to the triune deities of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost mentioned in the New Testament. The word Trinity in its original etymology simply means “three” or “the three”.
Never the less, lets deal with your doctrine using a Catholic Term attached to it.
  1. Does the LDS church borrow the Catholic term “Trinity” as to define 3 seperated gods?
Yes.
  1. Does LDS use trinity to define Jesus as a god seperate from the Father god, who is seperate from the holy spirit god? making the LDS doctrine of the trinity to mean 3 seperate gods altogether.
They are three separate Deities with the Son and Holy Spirit being subordinate to the Father. That means that the Father is the supreme Deity of the universe.
  1. You quotrf the LDS doctrine to believe is; “3 distinct and seperate beings” is this defining 3 seperate divine beings or 3 seperate gods as being distinct from each other?
The three Deities are separate from each other. See above.
  1. Does the LDS believe that two of these gods, the son and the holy spirit are subordinate to only the Father (one distinct god) which is seperated from the son god and the holy spirit god? confirming the LDS doctrine is to believe in 3 seperate gods not one?
See above.
  1. Can you clarify here, if items 1 -4 is your interpretation of the LDS belief in the trnity? If not can you clarify what is different?
The above is self-explanatory.
Does your LDS “trinity” doctrine conflict with this biblical passage of the trinity? from John 10:30 The Father and I are one."
No. In that prayer Jesus also prays that all the disciples may be made one with Him as He is one with the Father.
In conclusion and please correct me if Iam wrong here?
The LDS trinity doctrine believe in 3 seperate gods, never one god.
The LDS doctrine of the Trinity believes in three separate Deities two of Whom are subordinate to the third, the Father, making the Father the supreme Deity of heaven, and the ultimate One God of the Bible (see Matthew 6:9; Luke 11:2; 28; John 14:28; John 20:17).
 
Here’s the Thing about the Trinity:
10 “ You are My witnesses,” says the LORD, “ And My servant whom I have chosen, That you may know and believe Me, And understand that I am He.
Before Me there was no God formed, Nor shall there be after Me.
  • Isaiah 43:10
6 “ Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel,
And his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts:
Code:
  ‘ I am the First and I am the Last; 
  Besides Me there is no God.
Isaiah 44:6
8 Do not fear, nor be afraid;
Have I not told you from that time, and declared it?
You are My witnesses.
Is there a God besides Me?
Indeed there is no other Rock;
I know not one.’”
  • Isaiah 44:8
6 That they may know from the rising of the sun to its setting
That there is none besides Me.
I am the LORD, and there is no other;
7 I form the light and create darkness,
I make peace and create calamity;
I, the LORD, do all these things.’
  • Isaiah 45:6
If you believe the bible, that there is no God other than the One True God, then the references to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit MUST refer to the one God in three persons. If you don’t believe in the Trinity, then you don’t believe the bible.

We know from the statements of Mormon General Authorities that the Mormons believe the bible to be hopelessly corrupt and untrustworthy. Therefore it is easy to understand why the Mormons do not believe in the Trinity as taught by Christianity.

Paul
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top