D
dixieagle
Guest
“Baptisms” which, of course, have exactly the same effect as if I declared that deceased ancestors were all Munchkins.Naw…proxy baptism in behalf of the dead are just that, in behalf of the dead.![]()
“Baptisms” which, of course, have exactly the same effect as if I declared that deceased ancestors were all Munchkins.Naw…proxy baptism in behalf of the dead are just that, in behalf of the dead.![]()
No one has shown that it is.If it is being used to “baptize” the dead, then it is an instrument of sacrilege, especially as it was uncommon not to be baptized once we step back more than a generation (in the West).
I would. The example you give concern Mormon temple ceremonies. You haven’t shown any relation between those ceremonies and ancestry.com.I wouldn’t call it paranoia.
Anna
The only possible connection would be an individual Mormon using ancestry.com to research their family tree and if, after having found said information on any given ancestor, uses it to submit that or those names for temple work, assuming it hadnt already been done.I would. The example you give concern Mormon temple ceremonies. You haven’t shown any relation between those ceremonies and ancestry.com.
Huh?No there is another reason why LDS prying into the ancestry of others is a problem. The BoM and D&C 121 encourage intergenerational hatred. Therefore, if you can trace your ancestry back to people who opposed Mormonism in its first 30 years, they will hold this against you, and perhaps make things difficult for you.
That is at the core of my problems with Mormonism.
Must be pretty isolated and more of a fringed element I’m guessing then.Sorry, I have seen it. It rarely comes up, since many LDS honestly believe that it was fulfilled. I have no idea how many of us there are.
I wasn’t trying to make that connection. However, it would be very difficult to believe that any connection between ancestry.com and the LDS would not result in LDS use of the records.I would. The example you give concern Mormon temple ceremonies. You haven’t shown any relation between those ceremonies and ancestry.com.
I’ve met some of those like that. Big into the Bircher Society…paranoid to the hilt and then some…Deep-ended type, I agree!!!![]()
That is not correct. Ancestry is not owned in anyway by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The church’s main family history website is familysearch.orgIs Ancestry.com a reliable resource for genealogical research despite it being run by the Mormon church?
This is an extremely imporant post. This is fist hand information and should not be ignored.Not paranoia, experience. I worked in the LDS business world in SLC for over 25 years. LDS business people consider it a duty and honor to support the mission of the Mormon church. I’ve sat in on many, many business meetings where the “mission of the church” is brought up. Product or marketing strategies were purposely designed to bring in converts or channel resources to the LDS church. Disclosure to clients/customers of these activities are usually not disclosed, not unless the primary clients/customers are LDS too. IF the owners of ancestry.com aren’t engaged in the same practices, then they would be some kind of incredible anomaly.
Brad Pelo’s business dealings with the LDS church go back a long ways.
The LDS already had miles and miles and miles of microfilm, years before anyone even thought of starting ancestry.com. Even if they didn’t, they can access any publicly-available record, just like you and I could. The only “solution” to this non-existent “problem” would be for no one, anywhere, ever, to have any access to any records that would reveal anything about anyone’s ancestry.I wasn’t trying to make that connection. However, it would be very difficult to believe that any connection between ancestry.com and the LDS would not result in LDS use of the records.
Anna
Therefore, if you can trace your ancestry back to people who opposed Mormonism in its first 30 years, they will hold this against you, and perhaps make things difficult for you.
QUOTE]
Really? Two questions:
- How are they going to know that I traced my ancestry back to someone who opposed Mormonism?
- Exactly how will the Church of Latter-Day Saints, to which I do not belong, “make things difficult” for me?
That question will have to wait until Mitt Romney becomes president.
- Exactly how will the Church of Latter-Day Saints, to which I do not belong, “make things difficult” for me?