Ancestry.com and the Mormon Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Naw…proxy baptism in behalf of the dead are just that, in behalf of the dead. 😉
“Baptisms” which, of course, have exactly the same effect as if I declared that deceased ancestors were all Munchkins. 😉
 
If it is being used to “baptize” the dead, then it is an instrument of sacrilege, especially as it was uncommon not to be baptized once we step back more than a generation (in the West).
No one has shown that it is.
 
I would. The example you give concern Mormon temple ceremonies. You haven’t shown any relation between those ceremonies and ancestry.com.
The only possible connection would be an individual Mormon using ancestry.com to research their family tree and if, after having found said information on any given ancestor, uses it to submit that or those names for temple work, assuming it hadnt already been done.
 
No there is another reason why LDS prying into the ancestry of others is a problem. The BoM and D&C 121 encourage intergenerational hatred. Therefore, if you can trace your ancestry back to people who opposed Mormonism in its first 30 years, they will hold this against you, and perhaps make things difficult for you. 😦

That is at the core of my problems with Mormonism.
 
No there is another reason why LDS prying into the ancestry of others is a problem. The BoM and D&C 121 encourage intergenerational hatred. Therefore, if you can trace your ancestry back to people who opposed Mormonism in its first 30 years, they will hold this against you, and perhaps make things difficult for you. 😦

That is at the core of my problems with Mormonism.
Huh?

The were never any talks or leaders teaching anyone to hold anything against anyone like you are suggesting when I was LDS. And I never taught it as a Sunday school teacher or Relief Society teacher or Visiting Teacher.

IMO, the real core problem about Mormonism is very simple. It’s false.
 
Sorry, I have seen it. It rarely comes up, since many LDS honestly believe that it was fulfilled. I have no idea how many of us there are.
 
Sorry, I have seen it. It rarely comes up, since many LDS honestly believe that it was fulfilled. I have no idea how many of us there are.
Must be pretty isolated and more of a fringed element I’m guessing then.

I have never heard it taught, saw it taught, never taught it myself.
 
I would. The example you give concern Mormon temple ceremonies. You haven’t shown any relation between those ceremonies and ancestry.com.
I wasn’t trying to make that connection. However, it would be very difficult to believe that any connection between ancestry.com and the LDS would not result in LDS use of the records.

Anna
 
Deep-ended type, I agree!!! :eek:
I’ve met some of those like that. Big into the Bircher Society…paranoid to the hilt and then some… :eek:

But I’ve seen that kind of religious/political paranoia in others of different denominations as well…

I think that it has less to do with the actual religious affiliation and more to do with something intrinsic in the personality type. It just gets manifest within whatever their faith traditions are…
 
Smith, while imprisoned in Liberty jail, wrote a lot of ramblings about how he was blessed and favored by God but his enemies would not be so blessed:

13 Also because their hearts are corrupted, and the things which they are willing to bring upon others, and love to have others suffer, may come upon athemselves to the very uttermost;

14 That they may be adisappointed also, and their hopes may be cut off;

15 And not many years hence, that they and their aposterity shall be swept from under heaven, saith God, that not one of them is left to stand by the wall.

19 Wo unto them; because they have aoffended my little ones they shall be severed from the bordinances of mine house.

20 Their abasket shall not be full, their houses and their barns shall perish, and they themselves shall be bdespised by those that flattered them.

21 They shall not have right to the apriesthood, nor their posterity after them from generation to generation.

Canonized in Mormon scripture D&C 121

The “from generation to generation” was used by Smith more than once. Found in his ramblings in the D&C (about himself) and in the BoM. He must have thought it had an impact on his listeners.

“Let the Government of Mo. redress the wrongs she has don to the mormons or let the curse follow them from generation to generation” Joseph Smith Jr. (from his diary) Printed in the “History of the Church” (with spelling corrected).

At any rate, to enforce verse 21, the genealogy of people has to be known.
 
Christ really turned things around in some areas…and we don’t curse, we are to bless our enemies.
 
Is Ancestry.com a reliable resource for genealogical research despite it being run by the Mormon church?
That is not correct. Ancestry is not owned in anyway by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The church’s main family history website is familysearch.org

I know this personally because I have been using the resources for years from familysearch. org. Ancestry is a separate entity.
 
I just noted this new thread:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=644814

Exploring the experiences of your ancestors is an important part of understanding the culture of the family in which you were raised.

It is much deeper than temple rites for the dead, which are superficial and mechanical. It definitely has a place in Catholic life, particularly for indigenous populations, and other minorities.
 
Not paranoia, experience. I worked in the LDS business world in SLC for over 25 years. LDS business people consider it a duty and honor to support the mission of the Mormon church. I’ve sat in on many, many business meetings where the “mission of the church” is brought up. Product or marketing strategies were purposely designed to bring in converts or channel resources to the LDS church. Disclosure to clients/customers of these activities are usually not disclosed, not unless the primary clients/customers are LDS too. IF the owners of ancestry.com aren’t engaged in the same practices, then they would be some kind of incredible anomaly.

Brad Pelo’s business dealings with the LDS church go back a long ways.
This is an extremely imporant post. This is fist hand information and should not be ignored.

The behavior of the LDS church with regard to so called posthumous rebaptism, even if their rituals and rites have no sacramental effect on the dead, it is not benign.

I have no desire for my great grandchildren to see some record somewhere which lists me as having been affiliated or attached in any wa to the LDS Church. I don’t want my ancestors to be given any reason to consider the LDS Church as worthy of consideration. Listing someones ancestors as having been somehow affiliated with or attached in some way to the LDS Church when they were in fact not does just that.

These are not kids playing with a plastic Harry Potter magic wands from the toy store. Aside from the sacramental effect they believe the rituals and rites have, the effect and intent is to pull people into the Mormon faith. Catholics have an obligation to God to resist pulling people out of the true faith. This is especially true when it comes to our Children whom God has placed in our care.

My children have been warned that these sites, if not proven to be part of the LDS Church (which familysearch.org has explicitly stated that it is), show enough evidence of proximity to LDS to warrant avoiding them altogether.

I will not compromize on the salvation of my Children. My children have been sterly warned about these sites.

-Tim-
 
I wasn’t trying to make that connection. However, it would be very difficult to believe that any connection between ancestry.com and the LDS would not result in LDS use of the records.

Anna
The LDS already had miles and miles and miles of microfilm, years before anyone even thought of starting ancestry.com. Even if they didn’t, they can access any publicly-available record, just like you and I could. The only “solution” to this non-existent “problem” would be for no one, anywhere, ever, to have any access to any records that would reveal anything about anyone’s ancestry.
 
Therefore, if you can trace your ancestry back to people who opposed Mormonism in its first 30 years, they will hold this against you, and perhaps make things difficult for you. 😦
QUOTE]

Really? Two questions:
  1. How are they going to know that I traced my ancestry back to someone who opposed Mormonism?
  2. Exactly how will the Church of Latter-Day Saints, to which I do not belong, “make things difficult” for me?
 
Making genealogy a private hobby would make it nearly impossible, because then people could not link up with established lines. However, my personal belief is that g’g’g grandparents is just as far as one needs to go. In that case, private genealogies might work. DAR is a snob org, anyway.

Hate crimes laws should be enacted nation-wide which cover ancestry, as well as the traditional categories. Most such laws do include it, but nobody really understands what it is about. If they are aggressively prosecuted there would not be such serious concerns. But the perps can be awfully sneaky.

People should not have to suffer for the sins, crimes, or actions of their ancestors.

Signed,

Korihor
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top