** Okay. I presume I become a bit aggressive because
I tire of the constant proclamation by the Church (not by many Catholics I know) that there is only one true path, one true church, and all the rest are wrong**. Somehow that strikes me as arrogance. lack of humility, pride. Over the years I have come to believe that the universe is much too complex for any church to claim infallibility. And, true, I don’t accept the Bible literally. That is a form of Protestantism that also claims to preach the full and only truth.
**
It actually started rather young when I doubted that God, that loving, forgiving God, would actually drown all those people (including children plus animals) as related in the story of Noah.** Many other problems developed as I became increasingly familiar with the Bible. I recall actually laughing - a shocked laughter - when I first read the story how God had two she-bears maul 42 young people because they made fun of Elisha’s bald head. Give me a break! And as I became a strong peace advocate, how could I celebrate that “Saul has killed his thousands but David has killed his ten thousands”!. I view that as the antithesis of Christ’s teaching that we love one another. “Ye have heard it said, love your neighbor but hate your enemy, but I say unto you…”
** Then you have Moses, who wrote the first five books of the Bible (allegedly), in which he is called the meekest man on earth and his death and burial are recorded.** I doubt that our loving God would also send the angel of death to kill the first-born in every Egyptian home. Lies? Not really. Traditions. Like Washington could not tell a lie.
** My insistence on thinking for myself is dismissed as egotism, of course, or maybe rebelliousness.** If I had the privilege to be a Catholic and believe or disbelieve in such doctrines as the sinless life of Mary, transubstantiation, and some miracles atrributed to various saints I could be a Catholic. The Church does wonderful work in so many areas. So many of the fine priests deserve our admiration along with sisters and various other devoted souls. Or, can a good Catholic practice birth control - artificial as it’s called - when he and his wife have a family the size they feel they can support and educate? The Church says no. What sort of freedom is that?
** ** I engage others here on CAF because I feel a need to suggest to ardent Catholics that Catholicism would benefit from permitting more freedom when it comes to belief - and in other ways, too.**** We are in an educated age, when people are not as likely to believe what they are told, especially when so much of it may seem unreasonable to them. I say the same about fundamentalist Protestantism. It also demands conformity. Am I too open-minded? Probably many think so. That’s where we seem to part company. I have found that mainline Protestantism generally permits a breadth when it comes to doctrine. It allows, respects and even encourages independent study and thinking.
** If you consider this anti-Catholicism, I’m sorry**. If I didn’t have concern for Catholicism, the faith of my fathers (literally), I wouldn’t devote time to this dialogue. I appreciate the fact that my views are permitted here. It keeps giving me hope that someday the Church will permit more freedom when it comes to key matters of thought and practice.
Code:
**God bless everybody**. I'm sure sincere and devout Catholics as well as fundamentalist Protestants get to heaven (though I don't know all that much about heaven, even as I anticipate eternal life). But I also believe that 'liberal' and/or doubting Christians, Catholics or Protestants, as well as Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, etc., will be found in heaven in large numbers. We are not saved by our doctrines or church affiliation but, as Matt. 25 makes clear, by our love of God and of one another. The rest - in my mind - is debatable. Someday we'll know, but I can praise God while waiting.