J
JNdoum
Guest
I suppose you are right, I don’t and never will understand. however, I maintain that friendship should be a good example. Isn’t your wife supposed to be your best friend. I mean, yes, the physical is important. But I can see it isn’t healthy when it becomes all consuming.Yep, you got it. There are many other acts of sexual intimacy that couples can engage in, but yes, the church says it all has to end in intercourse.
I also wanted to apologize for any inconsideration I showed you. I truly cannot fully understand what you’re going through precisely, and I don’t have the right to pass unfair judgements without fully understanding your situation. It was unkind of me, and I will strive to be better in the future.
I also must say that I sort of have to hold on to my beliefs, and as they sort of necessitate that I try to share them. If I got overzealous or “holier-than-thou” as the OP stated, it was never my intention and I apologize, again.
Still, I don’t see how necessitating intercourse, which seems to be more like a full union, versus “other ways,” which seem to be solely for pleasure, is a bad thing. I suppose that as in most cases that is the case, then it isn’t wrong for the Church to stand firm on what She has always held to be true. She does have reasons for all that she says, if you only look for them. I suppose I am more opposed to your tone of “the Catholic Church is a prude so it’s never right” (I realize that those weren’t your exact words, but that is the impression I got) than to your views per se.
I also suppose even now that the Church tends to be reliable in what she proclaims to be true, so I am still more inclined to side with her. I apologize once more if I seemed to target and attack you or alienate you because of this. But I do beg you to reconsider both sides of the argument, with less of a “the Church is wrong” stance than you seemed to. Thank you, and God bless.