Another Ask-A-Pagan thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skadi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well to answer your first question, yes i guess its possible, but life is about finding ones own path towards the Is All. Finding one in which you can grow and become a better person more connected with life and the universe.
Good. I suppose then that “finding one’s path” involves considering options about what God may or may not have said in different places and different times to see which “path” offers the best and fullest understanding of Him?
And for your second question, there are 2 possibilities. Either A) societal evolution has shown that society’s in which murder is illegal are more likely to survive ad thrive than those where murder is legal. Or B) To not kill without reason or break the other universal mores is known by all men because it is universal truth, and all men being part of the Is All, have the most basic and elemental truth within themselves.
Both actually are very good answers I think.
B seems to be saying that all mankind got this universal truth from a single source, yes?
 
Well, I see you’ve been doing some Internet research. 😉

Me, too.

Matthew never actually says that he recorded the last words of Jesus, so that really only leaves a problem with Luke and John.

Matthew and Luke were not at the crucifixion; of the gospel writers, only John was personally present. The others got their accounts from eye-witnesses, and since John was exiled to Patmos, I don’t think that either Matthew or Luke spoke with him. The eye-witnesses who were available were the women who followed Jesus, and these may have been standing in different places at different times during the long ordeal that Jesus endured. Thus, they may have simply heard different bits of what Jesus was saying as He was dying.

All that aside, however, one attempt at integration of the three accounts would run like this:

It was now about the sixth hour, and darkness came over the whole land until the ninth hour. About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?”—which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” When some of those standing there heard this, they said, “He’s calling Elijah.” Later… Jesus said, “I am thirsty.” A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus’ lips and offered it to Jesus to drink. When he had received the drink, Jesus said, “It is finished.” [referring to the Passover which had begun on Thursday night - Jesus’ consumption of the wine constituted the fourth cup of the Passover which he had not consumed in the upper room]. The rest said [implying Jesus was not yet dead], "Now leave him alone. Let’s see if Elijah comes to save him. And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” he breathed his last and He gave up his spirit.
Truly amazing the amount of information we have at our fingertips these days 😉 But even so, the gospels, and certainly the older books of the bible, have direct many contradictions and can not be literally true. While the books may be true to what the witness’s saw they cannot both be true, a man only gets one set of last words.
 
Good. I suppose then that “finding one’s path” involves considering options about what God may or may not have said in different places and different times to see which “path” offers the best and fullest understanding of Him?

B seems to be saying that mankind got this universal truth from a single source, yes?
Indeed, but different people come to understanding and peace in different ways.

and yes, You can call it design, I call it the truth within all of us.
 
Truly amazing the amount of information we have at our fingertips these days 😉 But even so, the gospels, and certainly the older books of the bible, have direct many contradictions and can not be literally true. While the books may be true to what the witness’s saw they cannot both be true, a man only gets one set of last words.
Agreed. But the authors may have consulted with different people who said, “The last thing I heard Jesus say was…”.

All that having been said, I think this puts the cart before the horse.

I cannot expect you to accept the inerrancy of the Bible until you first accept the authority and infallibility of the Church which produced it under the guidance of God Himself.

And I can’t expect you to accept that until you have agreed that there might actually be a personal, creator God who has interacted with His creation.

And I can’t expect you to accept that until we think logically about the origin of the creation which you do accept.

So, kick back…this might take us awhile. 😛
 
This is for both you and SteveVH.

When god appears to Abraham, it seams as if there are no more followers of God left, which is why he instructs Abraham to go to the holy land, and that his decedents will be Gods people. So somewhere in the bible between Noah and Abraham it seems that humanity has abandoned God. Thats why God comes to Abraham.
Well, yeah. I’ve been saying that God has reached out to us all along. :yup:

As for why there were no worshipers of God at that time, free will.

Ariel Castro had three women locked in his basement all those years, but he was not being freely loved by them, was he?
 
As for why there were no worshipers of God at that time, free will.
Ok, so the whole reason I went down that road was because an earlier comment by someone else asserted that if a religion was the correct religion it would not be wiped out from the earth because its diety/s would stop that. All I was trying to show was that, according to the bible, the same thing happened to the worship of Yhwh, and in so defeat that argument from the Christian perspective. Thats all I was realy trying to do.
 
Well, yeah. I’ve been saying that God has reached out to us all along. :yup:

As for why there were no worshipers of God at that time, free will.

Ariel Castro had three women locked in his basement all those years, but he was not being freely loved by them, was he?
I agree, the divine is ever present. We just disagree on its nature, whether it is personal or impersonal, and how it goes about reaching out to us.
 
Yes, when westerners say Karma they mean what goes around comes around, and Wiccans and other magic using pagans tend to follow whats called the law of threefold return, believing whatever they do, good or bad, comes back on them three times.

This is NOT the Hindu idea of Karma however, for Hindus Karma is not something that effects you in life, but effects who or what you are born as in your next life cycle.
Thanks. 👍
 
Ok, so the whole reason I went down that road was because an earlier comment by someone else asserted that if a religion was the correct religion it would not be wiped out from the earth because its diety/s would stop that. All I was trying to show was that, according to the bible, the same thing happened to the worship of Yhwh, and in so defeat that argument from the Christian perspective. Thats all I was realy trying to do.
The very fact that Judaism, Islam and Christianity exist today, in great numbers, completely belies your statement, though. The worship of YHWH was not wiped off of the face of the earth. It exists. It is the nature of our God and the intensity of his love for us, however, that is responsible for it remaining. Mankind, because of our fallen nature, tends toward falling away from God. He pursues us and constantly draws us back to him. He has never broken a covenant with man, though man regularly breaks his covenant with God.

The point is, considering the reason for your statement in the first place, that our God did not allow the worship of him to be wiped off of the planet, even while the weakness of man, if left to his own devices, would most certainly have accomplished this.
 
The very fact that Judaism, Islam and Christianity exist today, in great numbers, completely belies your statement, though. The worship of YHWH was not wiped off of the face of the earth. It exists. It is the nature of our God and the intensity of his love for us, however, that is responsible for it remaining. Mankind, because of our fallen nature, tends toward falling away from God. He pursues us and constantly draws us back to him. He has never broken a covenant with man, though man regularly breaks his covenant with God.

The point is, considering the reason for your statement in the first place, that our God did not allow the worship of him to be wiped off of the planet, even while the weakness of man, if left to his own devices, would most certainly have accomplished this.
Yes but according to the bible, his worship did die out and was then revived by Abraham, so the argument that Paganism is incorrect because it at one time been whipped out would do just as much harm to Judeo-Christian religion.

And Yhwh/Jesus/Alha is by far the most widespread diety in the world today, without argument, but as I said before this is largely due to government support and structural factors. While Christians and Muslims have sent out missionaries for thousands of years, where are the pagan missionaries? While there may have been societal pressure for christian converts to return once the region was totally Christianized that pressure was gone. Paganism is not a missionary religion.

And most importantly, the government support, especially in Europe, for Christianity. Ireland is the only nation I know of that supposedly converted en mass Without support of a Christian government. While Christians suffered horribly at times in its first three centuries, the warmth had barely drained from Constantin’s body before St. Ambrose was using his influence over Constantinius to effective rip the edict of Milan to shreds. Pagan temples were closed down, their funds confiscated, a blind eye turned to Christian mobs attacking Pagans and Jews alike, and what was at the time the greatest travesty of all, the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate.

Constantinius’s cousin Julian the Apostate was the last pagan Emperor of Rome and fought to remove the church from government but unfortunately a Sanassid cavalryman put an end to his reign after just 20 months. From there on, Paganism was forcibly smashed and outlawed until it was all but wiped out, save folk traditions. In northern Europe Christianity spread by converting Kings, who then forced the religion on the populace. And where people did not convert, there was war. Think im making this up? Google “the northern crusades” and look what happened to the Pagans of the Eastern Baltic.

That, not the will of god, or inherent truth of Christianity, is why Yhwh is the dominant deity in the western world.
 
Ok, so the whole reason I went down that road was because an earlier comment by someone else asserted that if a religion was the correct religion it would not be wiped out from the earth because its diety/s would stop that. All I was trying to show was that, according to the bible, the same thing happened to the worship of Yhwh, and in so defeat that argument from the Christian perspective. Thats all I was realy trying to do.
Ah.

Well, obviously a lot changed once God showed up!

Look at us today! :dancing:
 
I agree, the divine is ever present. We just disagree on its nature, whether it is personal or impersonal, and how it goes about reaching out to us.
I know.

You don’t actually believe all that stuff you were preaching about God getting in touch with Abraham…
 
Yes but according to the bible, his worship did die out and was then revived by Abraham, so the argument that Paganism is incorrect because it at one time been whipped out would do just as much harm to Judeo-Christian religion.

And Yhwh/Jesus/Alha is by far the most widespread diety in the world today, without argument, but as I said before this is largely due to government support and structural factors. While Christians and Muslims have sent out missionaries for thousands of years, where are the pagan missionaries? While there may have been societal pressure for christian converts to return once the region was totally Christianized that pressure was gone. Paganism is not a missionary religion.

And most importantly, the government support, especially in Europe, for Christianity. Ireland is the only nation I know of that supposedly converted en mass Without support of a Christian government. While Christians suffered horribly at times in its first three centuries, the warmth had barely drained from Constantin’s body before St. Ambrose was using his influence over Constantinius to effective rip the edict of Milan to shreds. Pagan temples were closed down, their funds confiscated, a blind eye turned to Christian mobs attacking Pagans and Jews alike, and what was at the time the greatest travesty of all, the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate.

Constantinius’s cousin Julian the Apostate was the last pagan Emperor of Rome and fought to remove the church from government but unfortunately a Sanassid cavalryman put an end to his reign after just 20 months. From there on, Paganism was forcibly smashed and outlawed until it was all but wiped out, save folk traditions. In northern Europe Christianity spread by converting Kings, who then forced the religion on the populace. And where people did not convert, there was war. Think im making this up? Google “the northern crusades” and look what happened to the Pagans of the Eastern Baltic.

That, not the will of god, or inherent truth of Christianity, is why Yhwh is the dominant deity in the western world.
All I can say is that I wish the government was supporting us today; or even just leaving us alone to practice our faith.
 
I know.

You don’t actually believe all that stuff you were preaching about God getting in touch with Abraham…
No, not at all. But as a person who loves debate i find it important to have the mental flexibility to argue even when you do not have personal belief in the basis of the argument. I think of it as arguing a what if scenario.
 
All I can say is that I wish the government was supporting us today; or even just leaving us alone to practice our faith.
Yes, the government does seem to treat Christianity a bit unfairly sometimes. Im for total separation of church and state, but I honesty don’t give a **** about god in the pledge of allegiance or people praying in public. And while people throw a fit over statutes of the ten commandments they seem to forget the scales of justice are pagan symbols. If you removed everything that could have religious connotations from public places then art would be Pepsi billboards.
 
Yes, the government does seem to treat Christianity a bit unfairly sometimes. Im for total separation of church and state, but I honesty don’t give a **** about god in the pledge of allegiance or people praying in public. And while people throw a fit over statutes of the ten commandments they seem to forget the scales of justice are pagan symbols. If you removed everything that could have religious connotations from public places then art would be Pepsi billboards.
Indeed.
 
I would agree, totally. One should believe what they think is true, not what they wish was true.
And if one cannot say that he has changed his viewpoint/beliefs/morality because “Thus sayeth God (or gods, if that’s the paradigm one has espoused)”, then one has simply created a god in one’s own image and likeness.

For it stands to reason that God (or gods) would command ideals/beliefs/morality that is different than ours, right?
 
And if one cannot say that he has changed his viewpoint/beliefs/morality because “Thus sayeth God (or gods, if that’s the paradigm one has espoused)”, then one has simply created a god in one’s own image and likeness.

For it stands to reason that God (or gods) would command ideals/beliefs/morality that is different than ours, right?
Indeed, I myself had some serious difficulty accepting some Germanic beliefs, like that mens fates are fixed.
 
Ahhh a very good point, however I believe in many routs leading to the ultimate truth. And in fact the ultimate truth is, in my opinion, totally beyond human capacity. However you are correct, the truth mus flow from a single source, and I would call that the Is All.
I’ll touch up this one first, the other Randy hit details a bit, I’ll respond later as it’s more in depth.

So we agree there is 1 souce.

We agree there is at least some truth in religions generally, the factor that attracts.

The only way for us to know the above concept is if it was told to us.

What we consider truth’s in faith have to be revelations from the source.

If truth was not a revelation from the source, I’d be the first atheist convert in the line.

Now, if there is 1 source, and ‘truth’s’ in religions have to be revealed, is it logical the ‘truth’ the source wants his creation to know was delivered directly to those the source saw as capable of handling the load of recieving and delivering the information?

Is it logical the source wants that revealed truth to be taught, but never bent?

Is it logical that the creation would bend the truth to fit their desire?

If many routes were the way to the source, that would mean Humans know more than the source. Who picks the route?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top