Another one bites the dust - bannon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roseeurekacross
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The risk of Bannon leaving the White House is him becoming a critic of Trump. Given his roots in right-wing propaganda, he could be very damaging to Trump.
 
Wow. The White House is imploding and his supporters are pulling the victim card.

It’s like the mom who has the most disruptive kid in the whole school but claims that her lovely son would be better-behaved if the other kids weren’t so set against him.
 
People can complain, whine and moan about Trump all they want but he’s President.

Talk about complaints of Trump supporters, the anti Trump crowd is beyond the realm in even complaining about his lack of exercise on one thread.

So what if another one bites the dust? Do the Trump supporters really care about this issue or is it just another reason to complain?
 
People can complain, whine and moan about Trump all they want but he’s President.

Talk about complaints of Trump supporters, the anti Trump crowd is beyond the realm in even complaining about his lack of exercise on one thread. Good Grief, what next will you complain about?

So what if one bites the dust; do the Trump supporters really care about this issue or it just another reason to complain?
You don’t find it bizarre? Just another day at work at the WH? This is normal to you?
 
You don’t find it bizarre? Just another day at work at the WH? This is normal to you?
Bizarre compared to what? Keeping incompetent, non supportive people in the white house for years and Years…just because they were once given a position.

Personally I feel it’s bizarre to people who aren’t used to the Presidency operating like a business. I personally prefer it.

I just hope the new person that fills the position will exercise enough!~:D
 
Bizarre compared to what? Keeping incompetent, non supportive people in the white house for years and Years…just because they were once given a position.

Personally I feel it’s bizarre to people who aren’t used to the Presidency operating like a business. I personally prefer it.

I just hope the new person that fills the position will exercise enough!~:D
You might be surprised to know this, but, in businesses, we try to hire good people right from the get-go, not hire them and fire them six months later. You have a very interesting perspective on how business works.
 
You might be surprised to know this, but, in businesses, we try to hire good people right from the get-go, not hire them and fire them six months later. You have a very interesting perspective on how business works.
Yep, it’s very expensive to hire someone new. If this were a business they’d be looking for a new CEO.
 
Bizarre compared to what? Keeping incompetent, non supportive people in the white house for years and Years…just because they were once given a position.

Personally I feel it’s bizarre to people who aren’t used to the Presidency operating like a business. I personally prefer it.

I just hope the new person that fills the position will exercise enough!~:D
Yep. Just like DT said–he could “stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody” and not lose supporters.

#gettingmoreandmorebizarre
 
Zzyzx Road, how have neocons treated Trump badly?
They got his appointees fired from the NSC; they’ve been blocking many other Trump appointees in favor of their own people. They’ve been seeing to it that their pets in Congress are stiffing him re Russia, Mueller, tax reform, etc. Most of what Trump is getting done is happening through executive orders and appointments; Congress is certainly not doing much for him and don’t want to be seen to be doing much for him now that he’s digging his own holes.
 
More evidence that Trump is over his head and has been since he decided to run for president.’

He has no clue on how government works and this resulted in not vetting people correctly for the job.

He’s not a CEO, but a president.

He doesn’t get to order people as a CEO does, because he doesn’t pay them. The taxpayers do through the Congress which appropriates spending.

Mitch McConnell being removed would be another improvement in our government, but that will have to wait til is re-election time.

Jim
 
More evidence that Trump is over his head and has been since he decided to run for president.’

He has no clue on how government works and this resulted in not vetting people correctly for the job.

He’s not a CEO, but a president.

He doesn’t get to order people as a CEO does, because he doesn’t pay them. The taxpayers do through the Congress which appropriates spending.

Mitch McConnell being removed would be another improvement in our government, but that will have to wait til is re-election time.

Jim
Not only McConnell. Add Flake, Graham, Rubio and McCain to that list. That’s just for the Senators. Start with Paul Ryan among the Representatives.

Many senators and congressmen, both Republicans and Democrats, have lost touch with the average American and should be removed. If Trump is forced out of office prior to the midterms, there will be a huge voter backlash in 2018. If those who oppose him are smart, they’ll leave him there twisting in the wind as they work on stripping his rank and file support from him.
 
🙂

This makes me very happy.
Don’t celebrate too hard … remember the words of Karl Keating:

“The public is always willing to accept someone or some organization that appeals to its unrespectable prejudices if it can, at the same time, reject propagandists at the fringe.”
 
Yep. Just like DT said–he could “stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody” and not lose supporters.

#gettingmoreandmorebizarre
I didn’t even vote for Trump. He’s not been in office overly long. I’m just not a negative person that the country will go to “hell in a handbasket” if he fires a few people or replaces a few people.

I’m open to see what might be done and I am happy about the Supreme Court Justice. I am pro life.
 
I didn’t even vote for Trump. He’s not been in office overly long. I’m just not a negative person that the country will go to “hell in a handbasket” if he fires a few people or replaces a few people.
Maybe it will, maybe it won’t.

But it’s certainly worthy of discussion and I find it peculiar that people are upset that we’re talking about this very bizarre and chaotic administration.
 
At least Bannon got fired before anyone constructed a statue of him that will have to be torn down.🙂
 
Yep, it’s very expensive to hire someone new. If this were a business they’d be looking for a new CEO.
Yep. It’s possible for a manager to hire one person who might turn out to not be a good fit and be out the door pretty quickly–people can pull off a dazzling performance in an interview and then once in the job, show their inadequacies pretty fast. (I had one boss who had a new hire quit within a week because the individual decided they didn’t really want to live in Colorado after all.) The occasional 'bad hire get ‘em out quick’ can and will happen.

But if my manager hired four people and had those same four people either got fired/quit in a six month timespan, you can bet her boss would be looking at her and realizing that she’s the common denominator in all this…that somehow, her judgment is sorely lacking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top