Another one bites the dust - bannon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roseeurekacross
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
WaPo
Trump, meanwhile, had been upset about Bannon’s participation in a book by Bloomberg News reporter Joshua Green, “Devil’s Bargain” — particularly a cover photo giving equal billing to Trump and his chief strategist. Every time Green was on CNN, where he is now a contributor, Trump grew unhappy with his references to Bannon as a thinker and strategist — and upset that the conversation was not instead about Trump.
Bannon’s critics noticed that Trump hated this narrative, and they would casually mention the book whenever they could in private conversations, slowly building a case against Bannon as a self-promoter.
ahaha
 
Many of our Presidents have come from outside Washington. That’s no excuse for Trump who had been running for President since 1988.
Of course there is no excuse. Just saying it is difficult especially for him who did not have a strong political background.🙂
 
Yes but their retention rate can still be measured in years. With Pres. Trump, so far the average retention period can be measured in weeks. Every time someone leaves, the replacement requires weeks or months to get up to speed on all dossiers. That is zero or low productivity time, or time when poor decisions are made. You can’t really run an effective department like that, much less the White House where decisions can literally have life and death implications, for instance the situation in Korea.

Actually, as much as I dislike Mr. Bannon, his recent statements about Korea, contradicting Mr. Trump, were spot-on.
“There’s no military solution [to North Korea’s nuclear threats], forget it. Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”
–Steve Bannon
prospect.org/article/steve-bannon-unrepentant

No wonder he got fired.

The President and Mr. Kim have something in common: they both believe unpredictability is an advantage in world politics. Their theory is like Nolan Ryan’s:
“It helps if the hitter thinks you’re a little crazy.”

They don’t want a guy standing behind them with a sign that says, “Relax. That pitch that looks like it is coming straight at your head is *always *going to break.”

On the other hand, firing Bannon probably shows that no one ought to be too sure about that. :eek:
 
Anyone who works for him should know he or she is dispensable and should update that old resume daily.

Has Donald ever been fired?
What is this? Not sure about your question.

He is the President - his priority is surely for a smooth and effective functional of his administration. If it is not going toward that objective, then he has to find a way to make it so, thus nobody is indispensable, in that it is more important to get it right. Obviously, the resignation of senior staff is pointing to that.
 
Has Donald ever been fired?
As nearly as I can tell, he’s only ever worked for his parents. I don’t even know if he’s ever had a superior, other than his father.

He certainly has a lot of experience at running a business, but running the US government is quite different. He became President of a tripartite constitutional government, not King. More to the point, he can’t just jettison divisions that aren’t in an area he wants to pursue. His job is stewardship, not making a profit. He can’t just sell off properties he isn’t fond of or get rid of those that don’t bring in a profit. He’s got to keep all the balls in the air.
 
Then let me add that you are following the narrative of the LEFTIST MSM,
And you are following the narrative of the RIGHT media.

So not sure why you think your tendentious source is any better than my sources.

AGAIN, with the double standard.
 
I do find it peculiar people find everything about Trump negative. No one is completely worthy of negative criticism. That’s my thought. He has done a good thing with the Supreme Court Justice and perhaps more in the future which may be the best thing he ever does.

Maybe he will shock you all with some positive results as well!~:cool:

On that point we’re on opposite sides…
We’re on opposite sides here in that you think I’m unable to see anything positive in Trump?

Well, that’s rich.

Methinks that you, ironically and amusingly, are just looking at things rather…er…negatively…and wanting to just…em…CRITICIZE folks.

Or have you already forgotten this post I made, which was in a thread which you participated in?
Yes. And I’m open to the possibility that he sometimes does things that are good.

To wit:

fortune.com/2017/07/13/trump-afghanistan-girls-robot/
So, yeah, I think, ironically, you are blind to your own demands.

You want someone who’s critical of Trump to find something positive he’s done…and amusingly declare that we’re on “opposite sides” here….yet on a thread to which you’ve responded and participated in, there’s a perfect example of a critic of Trump doing just that.
 
Trump is not a Washington based politician thus forming a team for his administration is more difficult than say for a senior Senator or a Vice President, who is already more familiar with the environment there.
If only Trump had been more “tell it like it is” and let the American public know: “Hey, folks, if you vote for me, just remember that I am…unfamiliar…with this governmental environment…so there may be lots of folks that I have in my administration that aren’t going to work out. It’s going to be difficult to find a good team. Know that before you vote for me, ok?”
 
If only Trump had been more “tell it like it is” and let the American public know: “Hey, folks, if you vote for me, just remember that I am…unfamiliar…with this governmental environment…so there may be lots of folks that I have in my administration that aren’t going to work out. It’s going to be difficult to find a good team. Know that before you vote for me, ok?”
Except though he said that no one was capable of fixing Washington like he was, his military instincts are better than the generals, fixing obamamcare was easy, he was working on a great plan.

Also Carl Ichan stepped down today as well as advisor

I’m hoping Jared can step up and advise.
 
Jared is probably the only adviser in Trump’s camp who is untouchable. Because he’s family and no one’s been able to hang anything on him. Also word on the street is that Jared and Ivanka are classic New York liberals and have strongly represented that point of view within the White House while Donald Trump Jr. is more like his father.

That said, the speculation out there is that this was by mutual agreement, that once outside the White House environment, Bannon would be free to take his best shots at the establishment. If that’s the case, then Bannon isn’t finished by any means, he will just no longer be limited to what he could do from inside the WH. So when Bannon goes off again, Trump has plausible deniability in saying “he doesn’t work for me anymore; I can’t tell him what to do”. Also remember Bannon wasn’t in Trump’s camp to begin with, he originally worked for Ted Cruz so there may be something to that angle as well.
 
I’d like if we could go a week without hearing about someone else leaving.
 
My problem with MSM is they always whine and complain. It’s sad to me some feel life is so negative that that is the mantra of that particular news outlet.

It’s those I KNOW that watch MSM that say things like the “country is going to hell in a handbasket.” No it’s not actually.

It’s a cognitive distortion really to say that. “Everything is ruined because one or two things aren’t perfect.”

You can look up common cognitive distortions online.

Mary.
Anyone dare me to google all of the sources josie cited, as well as Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Sean Hannity and “country is going to hell in a handbasket” to see if I can come up with not a few examples of these guys making this assertion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top