F
Fitswimmer
Guest
How can we be pro-life and not for healthy children?? I understand the need for people to punish those who don’t work as hard as they “should”-but why punish the children??
That’s my big question.How can we be pro-life and not for healthy children?? I understand the need for people to punish those who don’t work as hard as they “should”-but why punish the children??
So, it’s okay for poor people to wait for care, just not you.Just want to clear this up:
No one in the United States is ever refused necessary medical treatment. No matter how dirt poor you are, if you walk into an emergency room with a broken arm, they have to treat you. If you go to a state or county teaching hospital and have little or no income, you will likely be treated for free (which means that others will be absorbing the cost), or else have your bill adjusted. The hitch is that if your case is a non-emergency, you might have to wait a while, or be seen by a student doctor with an overseeing teaching physician.
Socializing healthcare – even for children – would result in one great mother of an HMO. No, thank you. :nope:
So, should we just say kids can’t be educated because the system is flawed? Or do we fix the system?
Taxes. They pay for education, libraries, and police/fire protection, why not health too? Hey, it’s one less expense if you’re not paying for health insurance, why not just have the same amount come out of taxes? Or have a better tax system where the poor get tax cuts, not the rich.
With all due respect, the poor do not pay taxes so how can they get tax cuts?
Just because something wasn’t done on a grand scale before doesn’t mean it can’t be done. It apparently works in France, England, Canada, Italy, etc.
I have not been to France, England, or Italy. I did have a life-threatening illness while living in Canada and almost died. What happened to me would not have happened in the US, so I don’t think it works well in Canada either.
And I am talking about children hereNot everyone. Kids. Who don’t have a say. If we needed to start it on the grand scale, why don’t we see if this could work? Then we see if it can work for everyone else? The government does not spend a lot of money on poor children at all,
No money on kids? What about Head Start? What about food programs in the schools?
more money gets spent on poor adults. Why can’t we at least take one concern away from poor families, the health of their children?
I beg to differ, I pay taxes, I only make about 30k a year, not exactly poverty level, but when you consider I was paying 1250 a month in medical bills until I filed for bankruptcy my take home gets cut in half, and taking the maximum deduction for those bills out of taxes, I still owed taxes, and came out negative for the year, every year even while not buying anything for myself except food and rent. I’m only 28 and I’ve filed two bankruptcies for medical bills.With all due respect, the poor do not pay taxes so how can they get tax cuts?
Just to be clear here-I don’t feel the need to punish anyone for not working hard enough by denying them access to basic healthcare. I believe that regular health care for all will actually lower overall costs because people will treat problems before they become critical cases. I’d rather pay for regular diabetes care for 20 years than pay for amputations and long term care for someone who has a stroke.That’s my big question.
I’m a wreck because of poor health care throughout my life. My family couldn’t afford it, and they denied the claims anyway. If we keep the kids healthy from the start, they’re much less likely to become a medical debt bomb like I have. Staying healthy is much easier than treating a near-death individual back to ‘average’ and then just letting them go again until they’re near-death over and over again.Just to be clear here-I don’t feel the need to punish anyone for not working hard enough by denying them access to basic healthcare. I believe that regular health care for all will actually lower overall costs because people will treat problems before they become critical cases. I’d rather pay for regular diabetes care for 20 years than pay for amputations and long term care for someone who has a stroke.
My other issue with our current employer provided healthcare system is what a huge pain in the butt it is when you change jobs.
Apply for Medicaid, obviously. You don’t even have to be that poor to receive benefits. My daughter with a disability was covered for ROUTINE MEDICAL CARE, medication, and treatment, when we made less than 45,000 a year. So I’m quite puzzled as to why some here think that poor people cannot get regular checkups like the rest of us.So, it’s okay for poor people to wait for care, just not you.
Yes you can get a broken arm fixed in the ER. What is the poor person with a life threatening illness such as cancer supposed to do?
A healthy, literate population contributes to society.Education in this country is an utter disaster precisely because it has been treated as a right when it really should be a priviledge. It has been made “free” and as a result it is not valued, by those whom you might have expected to benefit the most from a “free” education. If I were made education emperor, tuition based on ability to pay (but consisting of SOMETHING for everyone) would be re-instituted for all public schools. Chronic behavioral problem kids would be directed away from traditional school and put into hard labor WORK training programs that would either teach them to value their educational opportunity or give them an employable (if not much desireable) skill upon completion.
“Free” health care will turn out the same way as “free” education. Betcha we’d eventually end up with crummy public doctors, crummy public hospitals and a system of excellent private doctors and hospitals that actually cost LESS than the public ones, but will be only available to the more wealthy folks who are able to pay BOTH the tax burden of the crummy public system AND the modest fees of the private one. (Works for schools!)
This thread betrays a notion in the heads of most that all humans are entitled to a comfortable life, free of suffering - and that the government somehow has the power to make that happen.
I don’t qualify for medicaid, I don’t have children, nor do I meet any of the other qualifiers. Some people don’t get it, period, that’s how it works. I haven’t been able to have insurance my entire life, no one will cover me.Apply for Medicaid, obviously. You don’t even have to be that poor to receive benefits. My daughter with a disability was covered for ROUTINE MEDICAL CARE, medication, and treatment, when we made less than 45,000 a year. So I’m quite puzzled as to why some here think that poor people cannot get regular checkups like the rest of us.
And PLENTY of us have to wait. Most especially those of us who pay taxes, pay for insurance, and get treated at teaching hospitals. I’ve done my time in waiting rooms. What about you?
Why would adopted children not be covered? The rules aren’t, if the parent can’t be covered, then the child can’t be when there is no illness known to deny coverage. If I was denied insurance, I could still apply for my daughter to be covered. Insurance companies don’t say “no children unless a parent comes as part of the package”.I don’t qualify for medicaid, I don’t have children, nor do I meet any of the other qualifiers. Some people don’t get it, period, that’s how it works. I haven’t been able to have insurance my entire life, no one will cover me.
If no one will cover me, if I ever adopt, no one will ever cover my kids either.