S
StudentMI
Guest
I think a lot of people tend to forget this if not outright ignore it.His actions also have consequences and the appearance of people like Vigano is one of those consequences.
I think a lot of people tend to forget this if not outright ignore it.His actions also have consequences and the appearance of people like Vigano is one of those consequences.
And yet, in the Early Church the Apostles divided the wealth and used it to help the poor. This is what Pope Francis wants to take us back to.We aren’t after all to be like Judas sourly (and sneakily) demanding that ‘that ointment should have been sold and the money given to the poor’, are we?
And remember the story of the rich fool and the rich young man.Check out Scripture, friend, and the many psalms in which God spoke Himself to His people. It isn’t a “prosperity gospel’ kind of thing, and I’m not just speaking of ‘material goods’ INSTEAD of spiritual goods. It’s a both-and.
You’re saying it, not me.And Pope Benedict didn’t?
And it appears my post went over your head.I hope we aren’t playing dueling popes. As in, “this is the first Pope EVER to go back to ‘real Christianity’.
I’ve seen this attitude so much it makes me nauseated. Even from priests.I hope we aren’t playing dueling popes. As in, “this is the first Pope EVER to go back to ‘real Christianity’.
That’s not really a practical solution in today’s day and age for an international organization.And yet, in the Early Church the Apostles divided the wealth and used it to help the poor. This is what Pope Francis wants to take us back to.
Yes that’s what I said. Exactly.So taking care of our own isn’t practical. Great.
Now let us throw Matthew 25 out of the window.Yes that’s what I said. Exactly.
I’m sorry you have a a hard time with sarcasm.Now let us throw Matthew 25 out of the window.
So my logic as to how to do this necessitates deleting passages out of the Bible. That’s a charitable assumption.Your logic would have us do this, as your sarcasm demonstrates.
Did Jesus command we do this or not?
Again, your words.So my logic as to how to do this necessitates deleting passages out of the Bible. That’s a charitable assumption.
You’re assuming that portion of wealth is enough. Again what were Jesus’s words on the matter?Who more effectively helps the poor? Someone who sells all their riches and distributes the money in a commune, or an organization that accumulates vast wealth to fund schools, hospitals, employs people, organizes charity and soup kitchens, and has the money and power to organize societies in a way that raises living standards amongst the poorest classes?
Actually I did. But it seems you’re simply looking for someone to agree with you. That’s a shame as this is a discussion board. You didn’t answer my pretty straightforward question about who more effectively helps the poor except with a rhetorical ‘what did Jesus say?’It seems you never wanted to talk to begin with.
Do Jesus’s words have no weight?You didn’t answer my pretty straightforward question about who more effectively helps the poor except with a rhetorical ‘what did Jesus say?’