R
Rau
Guest
People cannot commit themselves to hell by an act to which “they wouldn’t give second thought”.…Stuff most people wouldn’t give a second thought to can and do have eternal consequences…
People cannot commit themselves to hell by an act to which “they wouldn’t give second thought”.…Stuff most people wouldn’t give a second thought to can and do have eternal consequences…
But sometimes that hope is in the next world, not this one. As several of us have mentioned, chronic pain can be hell. The girl isn’t committing suicide - she is simply letting go.There is always hope with God.
Then you’re entering the blurred territory of "invincible ignorance’’, ‘‘willful blindness’’, ‘‘malformed conscience’’, ‘‘feigned ignorance’’, ‘‘presumption’’ etc. What I meant, though, by second thought, is basically not giving God the time of day, not factoring him in their decision-making. I think it was obvious from early and not so early Christian writers that Original Sin qualifies one for hell, that is, unless one is regenerated, born again, through baptism. So much so that the Church does not state that babies who die without baptism are in Heaven, she says we have reasonable hope that they are, and that she entrusts them to God’s mercy. My point? Our ways and views aren’t God’s views, and God takes sin supremely seriously. Charles Manson could end up in Heaven if he had a last-minute genuine conversion whereas someone that everybody would deem kind and decent could miss Heaven because he missed Mass once for frivolous reasons and did not realize how grave it is in God’s eyes.People cannot commit themselves to hell by an act to which “they wouldn’t give second thought”.
Far too much is made of the baby without baptism scenario. It is plain, at least to me, that God goes not condemn the innocent to Hell. What happens beyond that, i do not know.Then you’re entering the blurred territory of "invincible ignorance’’, ‘‘willful blindness’’, ‘‘malformed conscience’’, ‘‘feigned ignorance’’, ‘‘presumption’’ etc. What I meant, though, by second thought, is basically not giving God the time of day, not factoring him in their decision-making. I think it was obvious from early and not so early Christian writers that Original Sin qualifies one for hell, that is, unless one is regenerated, born again, through baptism. So much so that the Church does not state that babies who die without baptism are in Heaven, she says we have reasonable hope that they are, and that she entrusts them to God’s mercy. My point? Our ways and views aren’t God’s views, and God takes sin supremely seriously. Charles Manson could end up in Heaven if he had a last-minute genuine conversion whereas someone that everybody would deem kind and decent could miss Heaven because he missed Mass once for frivolous reasons and did not realize how grave it is in God’s eyes.
If the girl does decide to go ahead with her plan, I hope and pray God receives her in Heaven.
My heart bleeds for people who exit this life drained and at the end of their rope hoping to find peace and joy only to realize hope has forever escaped them. I only know God through what the Church teaches. If I went by feelings I’d want this girl in Heaven. One thought in closing: I’ve always thought that some people are just given a hand that makes it almost heroic for them to love and trust God and be saved. Homosexuals or instance. If a heterosexual is promiscuous he can always decide to find a woman, get married and have a family. A homosexual man or woman will have to face the prospect of living life asexual and without the many benefits of having a romantic partner. How many heterosexuals could not bring themselves to such an ascetic life, which is the condition to go to Heaven for homosexuals? Likewise if this young girl had perfect health, the thought of dying and leaving her family behind would not even cross her mind.But sometimes that hope is in the next world, not this one. As several of us have mentioned, chronic pain can be hell. The girl isn’t committing suicide - she is simply letting go.
Limbo (natural state of happiness wihtout the Beatific Vision) has been discarded as an option if I’m not mistaken. We’re left with hell (which is not monolith: there are varying degrees of pain and torment just like there are degrees of glory in Heaven), Heaven and its antichamber, i.e. Purgatory.Far too much is made of the baby without baptism scenario. It is plain, at least to me, that God goes not condemn the innocent to Hell. What happens beyond that, i do not know.
Nor is one condemned to hell if one did not know the graveness of one’s act.
Limbo was ever speculation AFAIK. A Kind of hope and trust in God. You do NOT know the disposition of infants dying without baptism nor does anyone else. Stop making this stuff up.Limbo (natural state of happiness wihtout the Beatific Vision) has been discarded as an option if I’m not mistaken. We’re left with hell (which is not monolith: there are varying degrees of pain and torment just like there are degrees of glory in Heaven), Heaven and its antichamber, i.e. Purgatory.
Your position that our observations of the actions of others is sufficient to enable the disposition of their souls to be known is simply wrong. You are making this stuff up.My heart bleeds for people who exit this life drained and at the end of their rope hoping to find peace and joy only to realize hope has forever escaped them. I only know God through what the Church teaches. If I went by feelings I’d want this girl in Heaven. One thought in closing: I’ve always thought that some people are just given a hand that makes it almost heroic for them to love and trust God and be saved. Homosexuals or instance. If a heterosexual is promiscuous he can always decide to find a woman, get married and have a family. A homosexual man or woman will have to face the prospect of living life asexual and without the many benefits of having a romantic partner. How many heterosexuals could not bring themselves to such an ascetic life, which is the condition to go to Heaven for homosexuals? Likewise if this young girl had perfect health, the thought of dying and leaving her family behind would not even cross her mind.
Best post here!I guess this is why we pray not to be led into temptation. I don’t know how much pain my faith could take or what I would do in her situation.
My heart bleeds for people who exit this life drained and at the end of their rope hoping to find peace and joy only to realize hope has forever escaped them. I only know God through what the Church teaches. If I went by feelings I’d want this girl in Heaven. One thought in closing: I’ve always thought that some people are just given a hand that makes it almost heroic for them to love and trust God and be saved.** Homosexuals or instance. If a heterosexual is promiscuous he can always decide to find a woman, get married and have a family. A homosexual man or woman will have to face the prospect of living life asexual and without the many benefits of having a romantic partner. How many heterosexuals could not bring themselves to such an ascetic life, which is the condition to go to Heaven for homosexuals?
Are you for real? I am unmarried like many others,well over 70 now, and my life has been full and rich without ever a partner. This is not some kind of huge trial! Nor is it asceticism. Nor is it heroism…Your terms of reference are bizarre and highly legalistic. No mercy? No Jesus?**
Well said.Your position that our observations of the actions of others is sufficient to enable the disposition of their souls to be known is simply wrong. You are making this stuff up.
Many of us know this. it is why we must help folk to get past and through crises, hold them until things ease for often suicide in whatever form is an overwhelming impulse …Best post here!
I never understood the power of pain until I had to deal with my own chronic pain over a number of years. I had thought that those who asked, “Why me?” were whiners. But when the pain went on for days & weeks at a time, I found myself asking “Why me?” And there were times, had I been able to move, that I might have ended it all.
Now I pray not to be put to that test again.
I don’t think it is easy for anyone who lived a promiscuous lifestyle to suddenly change and settle down. Habits are not so easy to change. Likewise a person who is so steeped in sin, defining his character as it were, would not be amenable to last minute conversion if he rejected it all his life. You wrote:My heart bleeds for people who exit this life drained and at the end of their rope hoping to find peace and joy only to realize hope has forever escaped them. I only know God through what the Church teaches. If I went by feelings I’d want this girl in Heaven. One thought in closing: I’ve always thought that some people are just given a hand that makes it almost heroic for them to love and trust God and be saved.
Homosexuals or instance. If a heterosexual is promiscuous he can always decide to find a woman, get married and have a family. A homosexual man or woman will have to face the prospect of living life asexual and without the many benefits of having a romantic partner. How many heterosexuals could not bring themselves to such an ascetic life, which is the condition to go to Heaven for homosexuals? Likewise if this young girl had perfect health, the thought of dying and leaving her family behind would not even cross her mind.
My heart bleeds for people who exit this life drained and at the end of their rope hoping to find peace and joy only to realize hope has forever escaped them. I only know God through what the Church teaches. If I went by feelings I’d want this girl in Heaven. One thought in closing: I’ve always thought that some people are just given a hand that makes it almost heroic for them to love and trust God and be saved.** Homosexuals or instance. If a heterosexual is promiscuous he can always decide to find a woman, get married and have a family. A homosexual man or woman will have to face the prospect of living life asexual and without the many benefits of having a romantic partner. How many heterosexuals could not bring themselves to such an ascetic life, which is the condition to go to Heaven for homosexuals? **
Rosebud77;14091253:
One man’s nightmare may be another man’s dream, and vice versa, I suppose. i say things how I see them. Perhaps it says a lot about me, but the prospect of going home alone to an empty house or apartment every night for weeks, months and years is not something I could envision with a great deal of serenity. I think a majority of single people long to be in a love relationship.Are you for real? I am unmarried like many others,well over 70 now, and my life has been full and rich without ever a partner. This is not some kind of huge trial! Nor is it asceticism. Nor is it heroism…Your terms of reference are bizarre and highly legalistic. No mercy? No Jesus?
Infants can’t sin before the age of reason, which is around 7 years. So I don’t know what you mean by disposition. But obviously we are all conceived in Original Sin, that alone, without the regeneration of Baptism, seems enough to deprive one of the Beatific Vision. Limbo would have been a sort of compromise offered by God: you don’t get the full benefits of Heaven, you get a natural state of happiness, but you don’t suffer the pains of hell, including the pain of separation.Limbo was ever speculation AFAIK. A Kind of hope and trust in God. You do NOT know the disposition of infants dying without baptism nor does anyone else. Stop making this stuff up.
You’re right to say it’s wrong because i never said such thing. But I’m not naive enough to think that, say a promiscuous homosexual who has been vocally anticlerical will effectively rest in peace after his death. While I hope God had mercy or that he had a last-minute conversion and confession (or perfect contrition), I know he’s most likely in hell. At the very least, it doesn’t bode well for him. Same could be said of Dr. Morgentaler. I hope God has forgiven him and he’s in Purgatory for a million years, so to speak, but I think it’s not very likely. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_MorgentalerYour position that our observations of the actions of others is sufficient to enable the disposition of their souls to be known is simply wrong. You are making this stuff up.
You have spoken error in the posts to which I responded. You do not know the disposition of the souls of the infant unbaptized, not those of any other person. You can only speculate.You’re right to say it’s wrong because i never said such thing. But I’m not naive enough to think that, say a promiscuous homosexual who has been vocally anticlerical will effectively rest in peace after his death. While I hope God had mercy or that he had a last-minute conversion and confession (or perfect contrition), I know he’s most likely in hell. At the very least, it doesn’t bode well for him. Same could be said of Dr. Morgentaler. I hope God has forgiven him and he’s in Purgatory for a million years, so to speak, but I think it’s not very likely. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler
Ask a busy mother and housewife if she would like time out alone and watch her face!fOne man’s nightmare may be another man’s dream, and vice versa, I suppose. i say things how I see them. Perhaps it says a lot about me, but the prospect of going home alone to an empty house or apartment every night for weeks, months and years is not something I could envision with a great deal of serenity. I think a majority of single people long to be in a love relationship.