Actually Obama admitted this was his goal. Remember his example of an elderly and ill person who maybe should “not have the surgery but instead get a pain pill.” Frightening! I truly think the man is a fan of eugenics. He and Peter Singer make a great team don’t they?
That is, in fact, inevitable.
WHAT???!!!
Old people are expensive. And expendable.
spectator.org/archives/2011/04/22/ipab-is-an-acronym-for-death-p
But birth control, sterilizations, and abortion is a “right” and “necessary”.
To whom??? How did the world exist before 1970??!!! Oh my word. We are saviors of the world. NOT.
I’m not sure what’s going on. I hope that’s true!I hope it’s true, too.To whom??? How did the world exist before 1970??!!! Oh my word. We are saviors of the world. NOT.
I was just reading the news and I see Catholic Charities is saying that the Obama administration used their name without their consent. And now they say that they don’t approve of the mandate.
This has to stop too. That’s euthanasia.
](http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/)catholiccharitiesusa.org/
Yes, that is true. It is called “ration”, means there are limited resources, not everybody can get what they “want”. In his plan whoever get on Medicare, which everyone will when reach age of 65, then government has to approve your treatment before you can get it. He will create lot of jobs by forming a large data base and many people at the computer, when you (age 65 or older) need certain treatment, your information is sent to the central office, someone at the computer will use all information received to send back the response to let you know if your case is approved or denied. Chances are anyone above 65 will be denied for any operation and advanced treatment. That is called ration. That is another way to save the healthcare cost. In other words, you’d better not get sick when you are old, otherwise, prepare to die as soon as you are sick. This is America after 2013 if Obamacare is not overturned.WHAT???!!!
I’ve never heard of such a thing!! Is Obama really that anti-life? seriously? Does he not think that he and people he loves will eventually (if they are lucky) grow old and need that medicine? Is his view about human life so utilitarian? I thought the abortion supporters do so because they don’t believe that humanity begins at conception…but surely, everyone must know that old people are people, no?
Thx for posting this! I thought they had endorsed it!
We will probably never know. As long as it comes out that they are with the USCCB as long as they have “Catholic” in their title, it’s all good by me.
Yes the “Death Panels” which didn’t exist according to the Dems during the Obamacare debate were craftily removed from the legislation once Sarah Palin sounded the alarm. But not entirely. The IPAB which survived is in fact a death panel and will handcuff doctors as to what treatment they are ALLOWED to provide. It’s not simply that older, sicker people would be denied care, even younger people with treatable diseases will have to knuckle under the green eyeshade types (BTW I am an accountant) whose mission it is to control costs. If the determined “best practice” is a specific protocol but the doctor does not think this would be the best course of treatment for a specific patient he would be prevented from authorizing such treatment…it isn’t this way YET but the theory is clearly envisioned by the Washington bureaucrats who know what’s best for us. In the original bill there was a specific carve out for doctors to get paid to have one of those yearly chats with their patients “Well Mr Smith I see you have heart disease, have you thought about a Living Will and a DNR yet?” Wouldn’t want to spend too much money would we?
No problem!
