Archbishop: Obama Needs To Stop 'Intruding Into Internal Life Of Church'

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — There was a sharp rebuke Wednesday from Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan that put even more pressure on the president to calm a widening election year uproar. The issue at hand was the president’s insistence that Catholic institutions provide free birth control to their employees.

newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/02/08/cardinal-designate-dolan-president-obama-needs-to-stop-intruding-into-internal-life-of-a-church/
Great thread & post!👍

Here is a link to VOTE for Cardinal Dolan, as most influential person! He needs our vote,
our Church needs to stay relevant! He has his work cut out for him!

He needs clout to be able to fight with POTUS! The last day to vote is Friday April 6th!

time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109596,00.html

Thanks,
Blessings,
Pax,

Megan:highprayer:
 
Democrats’ Chosen Witness Derides Catholics
The “religious-liberty claim” of the likes of Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ president, in the debate over the Obama administration’s contraception/sterilization/abortion mandate is “bull****.”
That was the explicit message Barry Lynn, president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, delivered at a feminist-majority “Women, Money, Power Forum
” in Washington, D.C., March 29.

ncregister.com/daily-news/democrats-chosen-witness-derides-catholics
Michelle Malkin Tells Fox & Friends: ‘War On Women Rhetoric Has Backfired On The Progressive Left’

mediaite.com/tv/michelle-malkin-tells-fox-friends-%E2%80%98war-on-women-rhetoric-has-backfired-on-the-progressive-left
Republican Party Chair: “War on Women” Talk Completely Bogus
In a taped interview that will air this weekend on Bloomberg News, the chairman of the Republican Party is repudiating the Obama administration and top Democrats who claim there is a “war on women” because Republicans are pushing a bill that would stop the Obama HHS mandate.
lifenews.com/2012/04/05/republican-party-chair-war-on-women-talk-completely-bogus
**HHS-Religious Freedom Battle Yields Unexpected Rewards **

ncregister.com/daily-news/hhs-religious-freedom-battle-yields-unexpected-rewards
 
OBAMA ENLISTS ACLU TO WAR ON CATHOLICS
On April 3, Catholic News Service published a story on an internal memo from the bishops on ObamaCare. Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on it today:
The more the bishops study this issue, the more resolved they are in opposing ObamaCare. At the heart of the bishops’ objections is the contrived and unjust way the Obama administration defines a religious organization; it grants an exemption only to what it deems is a religious entity. In point of fact, it is the ACLU that is really dictating to Catholics what passes as a religious institution.
In 2000, the California Contraceptive Equity Law was passed. In it there is a provision defining what qualifies as a religious employer, and it was written by the ACLU. Besides noting that the institution must be a non-profit, the exact qualifying language is as follows:
  • “The inculcation of religious values is the purpose of the entity”
  • “The entity primarily employs persons who share the religious tenets of the entity”
  • “The entity serves primarily persons who share the religious tenets of the entity”
The Health and Human Services edict forcing Catholic institutions to provide for abortion-inducing drugs in their insurance coverage also allows an exemption for groups it deems religious. Besides noting the non-profit status, the exact qualifying language is as follows:
  • “Has the inculcation of religious values as its purpose”
  • “Primarily employs persons who share its religious tenets”
  • “Primarily serves persons who share its religious tenets”
Having written a Ph.D. dissertation and two books on the ACLU, I can say unequivocally that the ACLU has long been an enemy of religious liberty. Indeed, when it was founded in 1920 by Roger Baldwin (whom I interviewed in 1978), it listed all the provisions of the First Amendment among its first ten goals. Not among them was religious liberty. And these are the same folks that Obama turns to in his war on Catholics.
catholicleague.org/obama-enlists-aclu-to-war-on-catholics
 
Conscience Exemption for Me but Not for Thee

stophhs.com/stop_hhs_mandate/conscience-exemption-for-me-but-not-for-thee
Religious Liberty and the Gay Gene
A Gallup poll published yesterday found that between 73 and 80 percent of the public consider the following issues to be either extremely important or very important in this year’s presidential election campaign: healthcare; unemployment; the federal budget deficit and national debt; international issues, including national defense and terrorism; and gas prices. But only 44 percent answered that way when asked about government policies concerning birth control.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue offered his thoughts on the data:
catholicleague.org/religious-liberty-and-the-gay-gene
Bishops Reiterate That Mandate Recommendations Are ‘Radically Flawed’

ncregister.com/daily-news/bishops-reiterate-that-mandate-recommendations-are-radically-flawed
**Cardinal Dolan criticizes Obama contraception policy as ‘radical intrusion’ **

thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/220445-cardinal-dolan-criticizes-obama-contraception-policy-as-radical-intrusion-of-government
 
Thanks Abyssinia.
From your link:
christiannewswire.com/index.php?module=releases&task=view&releaseID=19405
Thomas McKenna: “So a Catholic Employer, really getting down to it, he does not, or she does not provide this because that way they would be, in a sense, cooperating with the sin…the sin of contraception or the sin of providing a contraceptive that would abort a child, is this correct?”

Cardinal Burke: “This is correct. It is not only a matter of what we call “material cooperation” in the sense that the employer by giving this insurance benefit is materially providing for the contraception but it is also “formal cooperation” because he is knowingly and deliberately doing this, making this available to people. There is no way to justify it. It is simply wrong.”

This comment by one of the highest ranked American Cardinals is the clearest explanation to date on the issue of an employer’s culpability when providing contraception, sterilization, and abortion inducing drug options in the insurance plans for employees. Cardinal Burke has illuminated with piercing clarity the controversial issue which has seen dissent from Church teaching on this matter among Catholic institutions and universities here in the United States. Cardinal Burke’s profound statements come at a critical time in this divisive debate over the legality and morality of forcing anyone to act against his own conscience.
 
Nikki Haley Slams Media: “Women Not Just Interested in Contraception”
on April 3, Haley made similar charges against the media as left-wing co-host Joy Behar pushed the contraception issue:

Women don’t care about contraception. They care about jobs and the economy and raising their families and all those things….that’s not the only thing they care about. The media wants to talk about contraception….while we care about contraception, let’s be clear, all we’re saying is we don’t want government to mandate when we have to have it and when we don’t. We want to be able make that decision. We don’t need government making that decision for us.

lifenews.com/2012/04/10/nikki-haley-slams-media-women-not-just-interested-in-contraception
 
**#138: That HHS Mandate. SPECIAL GUESTS: Pastor Jim Franklin & Father Larry Toschi **
Pastor Jim Franklin, pastor of Cornerstone Church in Fresno and Father Larry Toschi from Our Lady of Guadalupe in Bakersfield join Josh in the studio to talk about the HHS mandate forcing religious institutions to pay for sterilizations, contraception and the abortifacient drug, “ella.”
youtube.com/watch?v=G81vT7U-ct0
 
Thanks, Abyssinia, for all the links you post. If you don’t know about it, it probably is not important.👍
 
A blog post from a friend of mine.

thisroamincatholic.blogspot.com/2012/04/would-you-go-to-jail-with-your-bishop.html

Here is a snippet…
It’s not often happened, in my lifetime, that the U.S. government would flatly require what God forbids, or forbid what God requires. Usually political judgments have had to do with teaspoon measuring and prudential reasoning, sorting and bargaining and trade-offs of competing goods. The policy picture is made by pencil: we sketch and erase, we compare estimated costs and benefits of differing public policies. These things are negotiable; and the negotiation is called politics.
So it was most shocking, in the first few months of 2012, for American Catholics to face not the usual shading, tinting and cross-hatching, but a true black-and-white crisis. Through the HHS “Contraceptive Mandate,” Catholic institutions would be required to subsidize in practice programs and policies which we utterly – morally, ethically, religiously — reject in conscience. We faced not “politics”, but coercive force which threatened the existence of every Catholic institution in the United States.
As I write, some temporary abatement seems likely: the U.S. Supreme Court may strike down the huge, lumbering, tractor-treaded “Obamacare” machine in its entirety. Or the Court may knock out its key part, its money engine, the “Individual Mandate,” which would eventually collapse the entire Federal health insurance apparatus.
But what if the Supreme Court fails us?
Or what if the legal authority of HHS director Kathleen Sebelius to define and enforce nationwide insurance policy requirements somehow survives the wreckage?
Or what if the Obama Administration or some successor Administration tries to re-impose mandatory contraception/abortion coverage by separate legislation at a later date?
I am convinced that even the most favorable Supreme Court ruling will not prevent such crises from cropping up again and again in the near future. We will no longer being asked to tolerate evils: we will be ordered to participate in them: as payers first, then as providers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top