Iām thinking about this statement. Iām thinking about does it hold up under examination. Is this logic, although giving support to this priest, is it sound? Is it transferable?
If a man beats his wife, and he still hasnāt been arrested by the police, and you saw him do it. But, charges never stuck or were not pursued, is he to be respected as any man who respects his wife?
In the U.S. Governement that I worked in for some time, I saw true blue corruption, documented it, and raised the issue. But the U.S. Government has a culture of severely ābeating downā whistle blowers. Was I supposed to consider these corrupt officers not corrupt until officially charged and punished? Never gonna happen my friend.
There were priests that did molest young boys, it was known, it was buried. In absolute truth are these priests still to be looked at as with God and the Church?
The Church is made up of humans, imperfect humans. Error can be on the perpetratorās end, or the enforcerās end. Either way, we must correct ourselves as best we can. If someone hasnāt been deemed as heretical, it does not necessarily mean he isnāt. And laymen have the right to point out his errors as anti-Magisterium. It was laymen who exposed the molesters.
Me. I stick to absolute truth. Thatās why I love the Church, thatās why I am active in the Church. If thereās one among us, Father Pfleger, who has spoken counter to Magisterium, I donāt care if heās high profile, he needs to be rightly identified as countering Magisterium, and his Faith to the True Church questioned.