M
majick275
Guest
The current authoratative source for this is this:
Church Handbook
of Instructions
Book 1
Stake Presidencies and Bishoprics
Published by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Salt Lake City, Utah
1998 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
English approval: 9/98
Which states on p.96
*When a Disciplinary Council Is Not Necessary
A disciplinary council normally is not necessary in the following instances.
Failure to Comply with Some Church Standards
A disciplinary council should not be held to discipline or threaten members who do not comply with the Word of Wisdom or whose transgressions consist of omissions, such as failure to pay tithing, inactivity in the Church, or inattention to Church duties. *
That means that unless a person is already under restrictions by a previous Disciplinary council they can not be disfellowhipped or excommunicated for the above listed offenses. In the past this was different but this what the “offcial” word is now. Cetainly these things prevent you from getting or keeping a Temple recomend. One MAY be informally disciplined by their bishop though. This is restricted to private counsel and informal probation.
(ibid)
*Informal Probation
Informal probation is a means for a presiding officer to restrict some of a transgressor’s privileges of Church membership in ways that the officer specifies. Such restrictions may include suspending the right to partake of the sacrament, hold a Church position, exercise the priesthood, and enter a temple. If the privilege of entering a temple is suspended, a member should give his temple recommend to the presiding officer for the period of suspension. Wisely administered and humbly received, informal probation can be effective in helping a transgressor repent.
In less serious cases, a presiding officer may determine that a member needs a more active rather than a less active exercise of the privileges of Church membership. In these cases, informal probation may include positive conditions such as regular Church attendance, regular prayer, and reading selected scriptures or Church literature.
A bishop normally does not inform anyone of a decision to place a member on informal probation. No official record is made of such decisions, but the bishop may make private notes for his own use. He should keep these notes secure and destroy them after the probation concludes. If a bishop is released or if the member moves to a new ward before informal probation ends, the bishop may inform the new bishop to the extent necessary for the new bishop to supervise the remaining probation.
When a member who is on informal probation makes specified progress and meets prescribed conditions, the presiding officer may end the probation. If the member does not make this progress and meet the conditions, additional disciplinary action may be needed. *
Church Handbook
of Instructions
Book 1
Stake Presidencies and Bishoprics
Published by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Salt Lake City, Utah
1998 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
English approval: 9/98
Which states on p.96
*When a Disciplinary Council Is Not Necessary
A disciplinary council normally is not necessary in the following instances.
Failure to Comply with Some Church Standards
A disciplinary council should not be held to discipline or threaten members who do not comply with the Word of Wisdom or whose transgressions consist of omissions, such as failure to pay tithing, inactivity in the Church, or inattention to Church duties. *
That means that unless a person is already under restrictions by a previous Disciplinary council they can not be disfellowhipped or excommunicated for the above listed offenses. In the past this was different but this what the “offcial” word is now. Cetainly these things prevent you from getting or keeping a Temple recomend. One MAY be informally disciplined by their bishop though. This is restricted to private counsel and informal probation.
(ibid)
*Informal Probation
Informal probation is a means for a presiding officer to restrict some of a transgressor’s privileges of Church membership in ways that the officer specifies. Such restrictions may include suspending the right to partake of the sacrament, hold a Church position, exercise the priesthood, and enter a temple. If the privilege of entering a temple is suspended, a member should give his temple recommend to the presiding officer for the period of suspension. Wisely administered and humbly received, informal probation can be effective in helping a transgressor repent.
In less serious cases, a presiding officer may determine that a member needs a more active rather than a less active exercise of the privileges of Church membership. In these cases, informal probation may include positive conditions such as regular Church attendance, regular prayer, and reading selected scriptures or Church literature.
A bishop normally does not inform anyone of a decision to place a member on informal probation. No official record is made of such decisions, but the bishop may make private notes for his own use. He should keep these notes secure and destroy them after the probation concludes. If a bishop is released or if the member moves to a new ward before informal probation ends, the bishop may inform the new bishop to the extent necessary for the new bishop to supervise the remaining probation.
When a member who is on informal probation makes specified progress and meets prescribed conditions, the presiding officer may end the probation. If the member does not make this progress and meet the conditions, additional disciplinary action may be needed. *