F
Freshman88
Guest
and 100% of the child victims were children.More than 80% of the child victims of priest sex abuse were male.
and 100% of the child victims were children.More than 80% of the child victims of priest sex abuse were male.
More than 80% of the child victims of priest sex abuse were male.
Duh!and 100% of the child victims were children.
:bigyikes:The Church could issue new rules requiring all confessions be face-to-face, or in front of the congregation.
Ok so it would then appear that the problem isn’t one of homoseuality but of child abuseDuh!
It has been my understanding that an act of child abuse is more concerned with power rather than a desire for men. In fact, children, especially younger ones, don’t really have noticble sexual characteristics, those don’t develop until puberty. Based on this I have always understood the problem of child abuse to much different - and proper diagnosis is needed if were are to solve this problem.The point is there is a correlation between homosexuality and the abuse of children. If homosexuals are supposed to be in the vast minority, why is it that most victims are male?
I have never heard that before. I understand the homosexual disorder to be a problem of who they desire, not how strongly they desire. Looking at just heterosexuals it is clear that some men are more sexually driven then others. I had always understood that sexual desires are governed by hormones.The actual reason is because that is the nature the homosexual disorder, an impaired ability to control the sexual urge.
I glanced at those studies and they appear to look at statistics and speak nothing of the psychology.It is false charity to allow a sexual deviant to be a priest. Priests need to be psychologically stable individuals, among other qualities.
Nothing wrong with this as long as you don’t force it upon other people.I believe you should not eat meat on Fridays.
That’s because it’s wrong, Sorry girlsI believe there should not be altar girls.
The Church has no teaching on it. Believe it or don’t.I believe in Limbo.
I pray it once a week.I believe you should pray the Rosary.
So does everyone else. I don’t think anyone would disagree with you.I believe there should not be homosexual priests, nuns, or Catholic school teachers.
I personally know nothing about it.I believe Freemasonry is some sort of religious cult (that possibly worships Lucifer) and no Catholic should be a part of it.
So do I.I believe there should be a canon law that requires certain attire for Mass.
The Church has no teaching on this.I believe in Young Earth Creationism.
So do I.I don’t believe in cremation. I can’t stress the word “don’t” enough. I believe one should have a proper funeral and burial.
NFP is more realistic however. Either have a million children or use NFP. Either way it’s not contraception.I don’t believe in Natural Family Planning (NFP) or oral sex. The purpose of sex is pro-creation.
“Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves.” (Leviticus 19:28)I don’t believe one should get tattoos.
It’s just stretching lol.I don’t believe one should engage in yoga.
So do I.I prefer receiving the Eucharist on my tongue, not in the hand.
Wait what? Are some parishes doing otherwise? heretics.I prefer anonymous confession, in a confessional, not in a reconciliation room.
So do I.I recognize February 14th as Saint Valentine’s feast day.
Me tooI feel there should be altar rails. (Not really a big deal)
Not that I can see. On the contrary to not hold these beliefs would label one as a heretic.So, are any of these heretical or are they completely valid views?
Isn’t that heresy?The Church could issue new rules requiring all confessions be face-to-face, or in front of the congregation.
As a matter of fact, these are the normal practices in the Byzantine Churches; confessions are heard face-to-face before the iconostas.
Was that directed at me I assume. Your right I do have no handle on that word. In fact that’s probably my most used word, jk jk.Boy, people sure like to throw out the word “heresy” a lot. Before anyone else tries to accuse someone of heresy, please look up what the word means. It is not just a matter of disagreeing with the Church. That is a problematic position, but it is not heresy. It is with good reason why this website discourages such casual accusations. Many people here obviously have no handle on the word.
Yes I had noticed that as well, and behind it there is the same kind of insecurity that underlies biblical fundamentalism.Boy, people sure like to throw out the word “heresy” a lot.
I shared with you the title of a book in one of my previous posts.I glanced at those studies and they appear to look at statistics and speak nothing of the psychology.
Do you have any Church documents? I would be more convinced by tradition then these studies.
I got this book a few years back. I am neither homosexual or male. It is a great resource for anyone living a celibate life. Fr. Groeschel is mighty in his orthodoxy, and wise in is psychology.“The Courage to be Chaste,” a book originally written for homosexual men desiring to live as chaste celibates, has come to be one of the premiere reads** for people who either wish to live as chaste celibates in today’s world, or simply wish to know more about the Catholic perspective on chaste celibacy.** **Written from his perspective as a Catholic psychiatrist, Fr. Groeschel thoroughly examines the topic **in just over 100 pages. He examines ways a chaste celibate can be an active member of the community, how chaste celibacy does not run contrary to human sexuality, and other topics that are often confused by people who wish to discount chaste celibacy as “psychologically unhealthy.”
her·e·sy [her-uh-see] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA PronunciationBoy, people sure like to throw out the word “heresy” a lot. Before anyone else tries to accuse someone of heresy, please look up what the word means. It is not just a matter of disagreeing with the Church. That is a problematic position, but it is not heresy. It is with good reason why this website discourages such casual accusations. Many people here obviously have no handle on the word.
holdencaulfield, I’m puzzled why you would consider my statement about confession, originally from post #34, to be heretical.Isn’t that heresy?
huh?Do you get a straitjacket when you become a Roman Catholic, because if you put so much as a comma out of place you will be a heretic?
No.Do you get a straitjacket when you become a Roman Catholic, because if you put so much as a comma out of place you will be a heretic?
huh?Do you get a straitjacket when you become a Roman Catholic, because if you put so much as a comma out of place you will be a heretic?
Contraception - Intentional prevention of conception or impregnation through the use of various devices, agents, drugs, sexual practices, or surgical procedures.NFP is more realistic however. Either have a million children or use NFP. Either way it’s not contraception.
Yoga is a practice of Hinduism. If you follow the link below, there is a section in the article on why yoga is incompatible with Christianity.It’s just stretching lol.
Actually, the issue wasn’t pedophilia, as much as homosexual predation on teen boys.Ok so it would then appear that the problem isn’t one of homoseuality but of child abuse
It has been my understanding that an act of child abuse is more concerned with power rather than a desire for men. In fact, children, especially younger ones, don’t really have noticble sexual characteristics, those don’t develop until puberty. Based on this I have always understood the problem of child abuse to much different - and proper diagnosis is needed if were are to solve this problem.
I have never heard that before. I understand the homosexual disorder to be a problem of who they desire, not how strongly they desire. Looking at just heterosexuals it is clear that some men are more sexually driven then others. I had always understood that sexual desires are governed by hormones.
I glanced at those studies and they appear to look at statistics and speak nothing of the psychology.
Do you have any Church documents? I would be more convinced by tradition then these studies.
I would say NFP is a form of birth control. Natural birth control, like NFP, total abstinance or breast feeding is allowed. It is not contraception b/c it does nothing to stop conception, except abstaining from sex. By that definition total abstinance would be contraception as well.Contraception - Intentional prevention of conception or impregnation through the use of various devices, agents, drugs, sexual practices, or surgical procedures.
Natural family planning is considered “natural contraception”.
Under acronyms, it says contraception in parenthesis.
You have made many assumptions in your post. Few of which are supportable by data. But this is WAY off topic. If you want to discuss this tired subject further, start a thread. However, I will not participate. It is just not possible to have a sensible discussion with with willfully blind.Ok so it would then appear that the problem isn’t one of homoseuality but of child abuse
It has been my understanding that an act of child abuse is more concerned with power rather than a desire for men. In fact, children, especially younger ones, don’t really have noticble sexual characteristics, those don’t develop until puberty. Based on this I have always understood the problem of child abuse to much different - and proper diagnosis is needed if were are to solve this problem.
I have never heard that before. I understand the homosexual disorder to be a problem of who they desire, not how strongly they desire. Looking at just heterosexuals it is clear that some men are more sexually driven then others. I had always understood that sexual desires are governed by hormones.
I glanced at those studies and they appear to look at statistics and speak nothing of the psychology.
Do you have any Church documents? I would be more convinced by tradition then these studies.