Clay and Spirit, literally the breath of life.
That defines the Jewish belief.
You say “literally” the breath of life.
When you say this, do you realize that the Hebrew root word for “spirit” means several very different things “literally,” and in fact, that most of the Hebrew language is like this?
Unlike the Greeks, the Jews weren’t so concerned with specific definitions of words, and it’s a mistake to use their language as though they were; particularly when it involves cherry-picking one definition out of a dozen and assuming it’s the one that these ancient writers meant.
The question is not whether they were wrong, or right, but whether they are part of the Jewish experience.
The question is -always- “what is true?” If the Jews were wrong, as you seem to concede here, it would just be foolishness to continue holding to their wrong belief. If, on the other hand, they were -right,- it would be silly to resist that -right- belief.
You are the one talking about monism. I am talking about the essential indivisibility of human nature. The body is not a skin that we can crawl out of, or a prison that we can escape. The body is sacramental and core to our very existence of human.
I agree with all of that, but all of that is perfectly compatible with dualism, or even with the sort of “tri-ism” to which I hold.
That is Christian belief. It is not the Jewish understanding of those verses.
- Firstly, that’s incorrect. All of the people I mentioned were Old Covenant Jews, and none would have self-identified as Christians until much later.
- However, more importantly, if you’re advancing this view as even -compatible with- Christianity, much less proper to it, you’ve got to present some evidence that the view has been held by early Christians, and so has some support of importance in the Church.
Jewish understanding was eclectic on this, as the example of the Sadduccees already point out.
Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, and the breath of life returns to whence it came. The bosom of Abraham is parable to a process we are not privy to.
I’m sorry, but I have to call this what it is. This whole paragraph is sophistry; especially the first sentence, in which I recognize the genetic fallacy at work; namely, trying to disprove a claim by explaining how the claim originated.
Death is conquered not by the eternality of the soul in some non-material perfect Form, but in the resurrection of the body.
Again, I agree, but this is compatible with dualism and tri-ism.
to put it another way, if the body is not essential to our existence as human being, then the resurrection of the body must also be a non-essential belief.
No. I don’t see that this follows. Something can be non-essential to our -existence- and still be essential to our -nature- as a person. For example, if I suddenly lost all my free will tonight, would I still exist? Of course I would. My free will is not necessary in order for my body to exist. However, my -nature- would be drastically changed. For one thing, I would no longer be free, or rational, and therefore, according to the definition of “human” proposed by Aristotle, I wouldn’t even be a human being anymore. As a -body,- I would continue to exist, but as a -person,- I would not.
If you want to tell me that the soul exists, but that souls alone don’t qualify as complete human persons, I’ll probably just agree with that. However, bodies alone -certainly- don’t.
Or let’s look at it another way. “It is not what goes into a man’s mouth that condemns him, but what comes out of his mouth”. We ought not therefore to conceive of the body as corrupting us, or condemning us, or imprisoning us, but it is our minds-our souls if you will-that are corrupting the body, condemning the body, imprisoning the body.
I think you must be using the word “soul” in a non-standard way. Please define your terms.
Biblically speaking, Spirit and Clay are our two creators, the breath of God and the mud shaped by God’s hands.
The existence of the mind, the intellect, the emotions, the will, and anything that can be conceived of as Soul, simply do not exist independent of that which creates us.
God, you mean? I agree.
It is the earth itself that cries out through the crimes of the soul; the earth that becomes corrupted through the blood of those we hate and will dead. If anything it is the soul that imprisons the body, and not the body that imprisons the soul. Evil is not engendered by the corrupting effects of body on soul, but it is a creation of the mind and the soul.
The Earth is an inanimate object. It doesn’t have tear ducts, nor is it able to feel in the way that human beings do. That’s crass paganism.